Romney flip/flops AGAIN - abortion this time - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

spazlabz

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 6548
Share

Post
#51

10-10-2012, 12:07 PM

Originally posted by baddog

Some of you guys are pretty funny; especially those of you whose opinion does not matter.

no insult intended here baddog but...kinda like you?

Your opinion matters when it comes to the Presidential election?
Does it matter more than my opinion?
If so.... why? Are you a billionaire shoveling money into a candidate's coffers? Are you a campaign strategist advising a candidate and shaping his views of important issues facing the country?

Or do you just have one vote and a platform (GFY) to voice a condescending opinion towards your peers?

Some of the posters in this thread may not live in the US so we as Americans may be tempted to dismiss their view on our politics. However, for better or worse our politics effects most if not all of the world and while they can't cast a vote I think it's only fair that they be allowed to give an opinion especially when you take into account the diversity of nationalities represented on this forum.
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#52

10-10-2012, 12:41 PM

Originally posted by Robbie

Should be the way it is...but it's not the way it's being played out.

Hell, Bush came into office with a recession that started in the last bit of Clinton's tenure. He was catching hell for not being able to fix it fast enough when 9-11 happened and everything shifted.

I think the Bush years economically were pretty good. Not as good as Clinton's years (because of the tech bubble and rise of the internet). But they were certainly WAY better than Daddy Bush's 4 years (which were coming down from the good times of the Reagan years).

Obama has now been President for almost four years. He came into office on a wave of good will and popularity and both houses of congress under his control.
He could have REALLY done some things.

But he didn't.
At some point...and I would say somewhere around the 2 year mark...you have to start saying this is OBAMA'S economy and OBAMA'S presidency. Not Bush. Not Clinton.

All I heard from Obama during the 2008 election was that he had the answers and ideas to FIX this and get it done within his first 3 years or "it will be a one-term proposition" (his own words). Now that he is president...all I hear are excuses as to why it can't be done.

I have a saying: "Excuses are for losers. Winners don't need them"

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/..._share_twitter
Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record
Comment
SmutHammer

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 4301
Share

Post
#53

10-10-2012, 01:10 PM

Originally posted by GrantMercury

We can get Obama's 2nd term or Bush's 3rd.

BUSH LEFT US FUBAR!!! ROMNEY'S POLICIES ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN BUSH'S! WHO THE FUCK COULD VOTE FOR THE GUY??

Do a little research and see when the government was bringing in more money from taxes. Economically Bush's Term was better than Obama's.
Comment
SuckOnThis

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 6844
Share

Post
#54

10-10-2012, 02:02 PM

Originally posted by baddog

Only Obama tools feel this way. He has already said that he is running for President, not Paul Ryan. Additionally, his stance for quite a while is that there are legit reasons for abortions. He is not flip flopping, you freaks are just concerned because it is a tough race and you are concerned that your one term choice may really be one term.
Comment
SuckOnThis

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 6844
Share

Post
#55

10-10-2012, 02:05 PM

Originally posted by Ed Hammer

Do a little research and see when the government was bringing in more money from taxes. Economically Bush's Term was better than Obama's.

And yet Bush still couldn't pay for his wars and tax cuts and drove us $7 trillion in debt? Name one good thing republicans have done for the country in the past 25 years.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#56

10-10-2012, 03:39 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

The biggest issue when it comes to this election is it's effect on the supreme court. This election will decide the course of the country for the next 20 years or more.
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#57

10-10-2012, 03:49 PM

Originally posted by baddog

You thumbs up that but dont want Obama to win. lol
Comment
StickyGreen

.

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 13076
Share

Post
#58

10-10-2012, 04:00 PM

Originally posted by GrantMercury

We can get Obama's 2nd term or Bush's 3rd.

BUSH LEFT US FUBAR!!! ROMNEY'S POLICIES ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN BUSH'S! WHO THE FUCK COULD VOTE FOR THE GUY??

We basically just had Bush's 3rd term you fool...

It's as if people don't keep up with what's going on in the government at all or something...

Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life
Comment
Robbie

Leaner, Meaner, Faster

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 20960
Share

Post
#59

10-10-2012, 04:45 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Expenditure vs. income, economics 101.

bullshit. The govt. is spending 10.6 BILLION dollars a day and borrowing and printing money like it's going out of style.

The Feds stopped doing "economics 101" decades ago and live in a fantasy land of non-stop spending.

-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Comment
Robbie

Leaner, Meaner, Faster

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 20960
Share

Post
#60

10-10-2012, 04:47 PM

Originally posted by tony286

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/..._share_twitter
Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record

Tony I love how history is re-written. But you and I were both alive and working in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.

Those were great years. Unemployment was at historical lows (5% is considered FULL employment). I didn't know of any businesses going OUT of business in that time and everyone around me was making money (not just in the adult industry).

-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Comment
Robbie

Leaner, Meaner, Faster

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 20960
Share

Post
#61

10-10-2012, 04:48 PM

Originally posted by SuckOnThis

And yet Bush still couldn't pay for his wars and tax cuts and drove us $7 trillion in debt? Name one good thing republicans have done for the country in the past 25 years.

Name one good thing that ANY politician has done for the country in the past 200 years. (the only time something "good" happens for the entire country is if it's a side effect from some deal that's making politicians and their cronies rich)

-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#62

10-10-2012, 04:52 PM

Originally posted by Robbie

Tony I love how history is re-written. But you and I were both alive and working in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.

Those were great years. Unemployment was at historical lows (5% is considered FULL employment). I didn't know of any businesses going OUT of business in that time and everyone around me was making money (not just in the adult industry).

That's the wsj not some liberal rag. And that article was right after w was done.Employment was flat. My father worked for a fortune 50 ,they were pitching people constantly. I was seeing more and more girls,who worked mainstream jobs , laid off and couldn't find another so they turned to porn.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#63

10-10-2012, 05:00 PM

Originally posted by tony286

You thumbs up that but dont want Obama to win. lol

Obama has already proven that he will choose his Supreme Court to be a rainbow coalition; screw their qualifications. That is why I did not want him to win in the first place. Everything else can be overturned; it is a little tougher when his fingers are in the court.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#64

10-10-2012, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by tony286

That's the wsj not some liberal rag.

It was a blog on the WSJ; A blog.
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#65

10-10-2012, 05:09 PM

Originally posted by baddog

It was a blog on the WSJ; A blog.

By wsj staff
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#66

10-10-2012, 05:12 PM

Originally posted by baddog

Obama has already proven that he will choose his Supreme Court to be a rainbow coalition; screw their qualifications. That is why I did not want him to win in the first place. Everything else can be overturned; it is a little tougher when his fingers are in the court.

Yep they had no qualifications lol
Comment
Robbie

Leaner, Meaner, Faster

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 20960
Share

Post
#67

10-10-2012, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by tony286

And that article was right after w was done.Employment was flat. My father worked for a fortune 50 ,they were pitching people constantly. I was seeing more and more girls,who worked mainstream jobs , laid off and couldn't find another so they turned to porn.

Yes...the last TWO years of Bush saw the economy heading for the shitter.

And the reason for that? Was it Bush's tax cuts? Was it the evil Dick Cheney? Was it the wars?

Fuck no.

It was the collapse of the housing market. How come people try to pretend they suddenly don't remember what caused the economic meltdown?

-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Comment
2MuchMark

Mark of 2Much.net

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 50981
Share

Post
#68

10-10-2012, 06:57 PM

Originally posted by Ed Hammer

Funny you say this.

Democrats blame Bush for the economy, and are very fast to place all blame on him.

If you bring up that the housing market crashing was because of a bill that president Clinton signed, They get MAD and refuse to discuss it further.

It wasn't a bill. It was de regulation. A very over simplified reason is this : Loans were made to millions of people who could not afford to pay it back, of amounts that were greater than the value of the property.

Originally posted by Ed Hammer

Obama came in with a large debt.

.. caused in great part by the Bush tax cuts and 2 Wars

Originally posted by Ed Hammer

..He claimed to cut it in half by the time he ran for re-election but he Failed, Not only did he Fail, he doubled it.

It didn't double. In 2008 the Debt was at $12.3 Trillion Dollars. Today it is $16 Billion. This is a 30.08% increase, not 100%.

Predident Obama failed to control the rising debt thanks to Mitch McConnell, House majority leader Eric Cantor, and House speaker John Boehner, who seemed to oppose every move Obama tried and blocked many moves that would have helped lower the debt.
Comment
Robbie

Leaner, Meaner, Faster

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 20960
Share

Post
#69

10-10-2012, 07:02 PM

Originally posted by MarkPrince

Predident Obama failed to control the rising debt thanks to Mitch McConnell, House majority leader Eric Cantor, and House speaker John Boehner, who seemed to oppose every move Obama tried and blocked many moves that would have helped lower the debt.

Exactly! Because Reagan didn't have to work with a Dem congress. Clinton didn't have to work with a Repub congess. And Bush never had to work with a Dem congress.

Only poor Obama has ever had to try (and completely FAIL) to work with the opposing party.
Wonder why? Could it have been that first two years where he shoved Obama Care through while shutting the Repubs out completely?
Think MAYBE he might have fucked up big time by not trying to work with them the first two years?

-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Comment
GrantMercury

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2012

Posts: 1626
Share

Post
#70

10-10-2012, 07:47 PM

Originally posted by Ed Hammer

Do a little research and see when the government was bringing in more money from taxes. Economically Bush's Term was better than Obama's.

How about YOU do some research and back that shit up with a link so we can all see.

http://www.taboophonesexfantasy.com
http://www.thekittykatclub.com
Comment
GrantMercury

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2012

Posts: 1626
Share

Post
#71

10-10-2012, 07:57 PM

Originally posted by Robbie

Exactly! Because Reagan didn't have to work with a Dem congress. Clinton didn't have to work with a Repub congess. And Bush never had to work with a Dem congress.

Only poor Obama has ever had to try (and completely FAIL) to work with the opposing party.
Wonder why? Could it have been that first two years where he shoved Obama Care through while shutting the Repubs out completely?
Think MAYBE he might have fucked up big time by not trying to work with them the first two years?

There was no "working with them." They folded their fucking arms and said "no" to everything. They didn't want a Democrat to preside over a recovery after the GOP sent us into economic free fall. They've done everything in their power to hold back the recovery.

http://crooksandliars.com/jon-perr/r...ism-by-numbers

Obama 2012.

http://www.taboophonesexfantasy.com
http://www.thekittykatclub.com
Comment
GrantMercury

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2012

Posts: 1626
Share

Post
#72

10-10-2012, 08:15 PM

Originally posted by Robbie

Tony I love how history is re-written. But you and I were both alive and working in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.

Those were great years. Unemployment was at historical lows (5% is considered FULL employment). I didn't know of any businesses going OUT of business in that time and everyone around me was making money (not just in the adult industry).

Yup. Terrorist destruction of World Trade Center. Invasion of Iraq based on blatant lies. Torturing to death of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. The outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame. The drowning of New Orleans. Spying on Americans without a court order. Ban on stem cell research. Growing fiscal deficits and tax breaks only for the rich. And I could go on and on.

With good times like that, who wouldn't want a third term of Bush?

Obama 2012.

http://www.taboophonesexfantasy.com
http://www.thekittykatclub.com
Comment
GrantMercury

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2012

Posts: 1626
Share

Post
#73

10-11-2012, 09:18 AM

Originally posted by StickyGreen

We basically just had Bush's 3rd term you fool...

It's as if people don't keep up with what's going on in the government at all or something...

Really, genius? How many jobs were we losing when Dumya walked away? Where was the stock market? How many deadly, unfunded wars based on lies has Obama launched?

Go back to sleep.

Obama 2012.

http://www.taboophonesexfantasy.com
http://www.thekittykatclub.com
Comment
BlackCrayon

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 19634
Share

Post
#74

10-11-2012, 09:33 AM

Originally posted by MarkPrince

It wasn't a bill. It was de regulation. A very over simplified reason is this : Loans were made to millions of people who could not afford to pay it back, of amounts that were greater than the value of the property.

Indeed. This is why there was no housing crash/bank failures in canada. Regulations in place never allowed it to happen. Banks won't give you a loan if you don't meet their metrics.

you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...