I was being sarcastic haha

Breakfast- 3 whole eggs, 1 tbs olive oil, 1 chobani greek yogurt, 1 cup oats, 12 oz egg whites, 1 banana, 3 tbs natural pb, 1 tbs coconut oil

Between - 2 servings sunflower seeds

Lunch - 12 oz chicken, 1 tortilla, 1/2 cup black beans, 1/2 cup cheese

Between - 2 Baby Bell whole fat cheeses, 1 avocado, Egg whites or essential aminos

Dinner - 12oz chicken or steak 1/2-1 cup rice, 8 oz egg whites

Before bed - Cheese/greek yogurt/almonds or sunflower seeds, eggs or Homemade burrito. (any way to get 5-800 cals in before bed)

Total 37-4200/day

Well, obviously you are on a diet (nothing wrong with that).
I'm not. I just try to avoid "bad" food.

Thats not a "diet" thats what ive been eating for the past 6 years. Diets are temporary

:1orglaugh

Long term diet...whatever. You know what i mean.

Long term till i die or cant cook for myself anymore haha

I could never eat that much food in a day if I tried.

Well i couldnt do it right off the bat, you need to train yourself and constantly eat a little more each day till you can handle it. Now its what my body demands

Well unless you want to gain muscle there is no reason to do it really. Eating less is actually more healthy in general.

50 misguided hippies who know little to nothing about basic human physiology

uhm.... no.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

And you came to this conclusion how?

It's a well known fact.

i like milk...it's ok for me :)

More or less was looking for the source of your information...

doesnt fix mental issues.

Perhaps if some people want to look as large as you then yes. Fyi most people don't. No disrespect btw.

None taken, I wasnt referring to looks, I was asking from a scientific standpoint how that is true. Just wanted a medical journal or study, something of the like...

Well if most of us ate that much we would be fat not muscle like you. 4000 calories a day is a lot if you don't work out as much you.

I know that Bryan lol...c'mon now...When someone says eating less to me thats like someone my size being 130-140lbs and eating like a bird. Asking what is "eating less" What defines it?

Becon, salad, pasta. eggs, tomatoes, coffee, tea with milk
My body so sexy
Look my website :winkwink:

What's wrong with being 160lbs? I'm 5'8 and weight 170, ideally I'd like to get down to 160. The most lean I've been in my life is 160lbs.

There isnt anything wrong with it...im just barely breaking 175 now but holding 5-6% bodyfat steadily and im 5'7 so i dont know what youre getting at. This is why im asking how is eating less healthier especially if your body demands it. 140lbs of skinny fat vs 140lbs of muscle is alot different in both size and looks. I cant help it that my metabolism is blazing fast and i require what i do, if i "ate less" i would go back to 140-150 within 6 months.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Look, i don't want to sound like all the idiots who claim something crazy and then when asked for a source they say just Google it. But in this case...
I won't even discuss it, just like i won't discuss the colour of grass.
It's a well known fact for years already that the less you eat the longer you live. In general. So ofcourse if you have a heart disease, eating less, you are still more likely to die younger, no matter if you eat less or not.

Food and oxygen are some of the most important reasons why your body gets old.
The less you use the longer your body will last. Obviously the oxygen part is quite difficult to control :)

but you would live longer.

Lab tests on rats found that those that eat 40 percent fewer calories than their counterparts -- called caloric restriction in the field of longevity research -- tend to live longer, healthier lives.

source: http://health.howstuffworks.com/well...unhealthy2.htm

Ill have to do some more research on the topic. I should be dead in about 5 years then :thumbsup

You're quite fucking annoying with your spam. :disgust

"In 1986, Weindruch reported that restricting the calorie intake of laboratory mice proportionally increased their life span compared to a group of mice with a normal diet. The calorie-restricted mice also maintained youthful appearances and activity levels longer and showed delays in age-related diseases."

"Results published in 2009 showed that caloric restriction in rhesus monkeys blunts aging and significantly delays the onset of age related disorders such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and brain atrophy. 80% of the calorically restricted monkeys were still alive, compared to only half of the controls."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie_restriction

I'm getting over a shitty breakup, so I've barely been eating at all... At least I've lost 6 pounds.

Damn thats pretty crazy, I really do want to research this more. I feel like im restricted where im at now lol.

Phil, look up Intermittent Fasting as well. Research is showing that it can give the benefits of caloric restriction without .. Restricting calories. LeanGains is the IF protocol of choice for guys like us. See my blog for extended info.

Ill def look into it, just hard to mess with something that i know works for me right now...practically took me 5 years to get my diet nailed down to a T as far as what i know builds vs, makes me fat, vs helps me lose fat. The name of the game.

more like infested with parasites.


http://news.yahoo.com/organic-meat-m...152507756.html

chicken fajitas tonight :)

none of us have to look past that, because the problem with this study is you can't have a similar controlled state. Unless that you are able to teach a mouse how to push free weights...

All things aren't equal and this argument isn't sound.

I totally know where you're coming from. The only reason for the IF or CR (caloric restriction) is that it's shown significant life extension in mice .. who knows if it applies to humans? The biological markers are positive for the studies that have been done, though. I'm going to add a blog post specific to why it could extend life or be otherwise healthful, no bro-science.

BBQ chicken breast and a salad