I spent some time on that site the other day, it's full of ad hominems and weak/desperate attempts to debunk; most likely government sponsored as the Zeitgeist movement is a dangerous one

This is it, they use 'belief' as 'proof' rather than using 'empirical evidence' :upsidedow

It was obvious she was trying not to give the answer to the question asked.


If it's coming down, money will be worthless. Might be better off buying canned goods, lots of arms and an Island in the Pacific.

That isn't the only site that debunks a lot of the Zeitgeist bullshit.

I think the "movement" is bullshit in general, there is no movement, the only movement is pieces of "evidence" being chopped into bad documentaries which provide no sources for their suggestions.

People watch the videos and then do nothing, just keep looking on youtube for more "evidence"

I want to see evidence, they even take quotations out of context and shrink them or use certain parts to add weight to their claim.

its not the money, its the control and power it comes with...

and another comment.
no reason for the government to take away citizen right to bear arm.
have you noticed anyone (in the US) can carry a knife openly (not concealed) because it is really not a threat to authorities, same now - guns are no longer a threat to authorities, the gun itself can no longer carry a revolution.

This is from February 2009. So yeah there is probably a couple trillion for the market and banks.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU

2.3 trillion missing from the pentagon on 9/10, imagine how much went missing in the next ten years of war

Stop making sense!!!!!

And you think they don't have that already?

If there's a crash, they won't have control. If the US gets a repeat of the 1930s the people will not sit around as docile as they did.

I agree with Jesus H Christ they don't want to tell you who or what they are propping up.

This is the problem https://youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU

Still if it goes into ordinary Americans pockets it's good. If it goes into the pockets of the top few, it's corruption. If it goes overseas, it's suicide.

No shit!....

Misleading title? I thought the Federal Reserve lost the money, but it's more like they're just not saying what it went to. The word missing isn't even in the article.

Last Updated: February 9, 2009 12:43 EST

:error:

That's the date of the article which is discussed in the video

Ignore the date, wehateporn was just notified a few hours ago (or maybe he's the one that posted it).
http://planet.infowars.com/politics/...ocking-footage

It's doing the rounds at the moment

You didn't see it first at infowars then? Where did you see it?

In my email

Infowars newsletter?

:1orglaugh

I don't go to that site unless someone links to it here

Thank you, they are bankers they know where every dollar is.

AboveTopSecret?

A friend emailed me the video on YouTube, but I do know the site you mentioned, seems to have gone downhill

Brujah is more interested in my surfing habits than learning what's in the video :2 cents:

Not exactly, it's more interesting to me that you aren't forthcoming with your sources. That's very revealing about you and your choice of sources. Why would I have confidence if someone isn't confident enough themselves to share their source?

Add to that the misleading deceptive title you chose to use, but I understand it was just copied from your source.

Then the Bloomberg article you found and posted, which doesn't have the word "missing" anywhere in the article.

These are just a few things that point to you being an unreliable person to get information from, if I were interested in accuracy.

Still, I'm primarily a domainer and I have a bunch of domain names related to conspiracy and religion topics. I'm always interested in sources to help develop them.

somebody asked me a while ago if i was a troll and if I was in the porn industry.

I can easily demonstrate that I have been in the industry a long time, and I can talk in great detail about issues only industry insiders would know.

But, since I was asked that, it seems fair to ask others...

who are you, wehateporn, and what do you do in tha porn biz?

The word 'missing' is from the YouTube video title. If that video is made up (e.g actors, altered speech) then it's caught me out, because it looks legit to me.

Fair enough about the domainer thing if that's why you were asking

Look at my name Bill8, I hate porn; can't stand it. :winkwink:

PS Check the 2nd part of my sig

Anyway, please stay on topic now chaps

I keep sigs turned off. If I want to buy something, I'm not going to buy it from a sig. I figure if it's not good enough to put in the body of the post, it's not worth looking at.

what does the 2nd part of your sig say?

That explains, fair enough

http://www.WeHatePorn.com

anyway, to stay on topic, yeah the feds a pit, a rigged game. Everyone knows the game is fixed, but, nobody asked any of us if they were allowed to rig it.

so what? whattya gonna do about it?

it hardly seems like a months old bloomberg article that tells us something we all already know - about the trillions in shady loan guarantees, etc, and the theorized nearly $30 trillion in fed support for the financials (thats not in that article, but more recnet articles talk about am estimated 29.7 trillion figure) - is going to cause any kind of change.

let me guess - you think romney is going to do something about the fed. or paul maybe? No? how about beck? Limbaugh? Drudge?

who then? you?

First people need to be informed and understand the implications of this, these people can then decide whether they trust a fiat currency such as the US $ as a safe means of storing their wealth. If enough people do work out what's going on, there could eventually be a tipping point. However, my agenda is just sharing the information so as people can stay informed and make their own decisions, I'm just a link in the chain on this one. On some issues I am active, but with the Fed I'll just share info/warnings.

I know next to nothing about the non-nude sector, but thats enough to qualify as being in the biz.

Better evidence than I offer, I don't like to show my sites, there's really no benefit to doing so. All you do is give away your ideas and sales techniques and productive sponsors.

Thanks Bill8, from past experience I do get sales from GFY traffic, though I've never actively tried to get them. What I did try to do here once was get webmaster referrals; the promotion of the site worked well, but I only got a small percentage of the webmasters show up in CCBill admin.

I used to share advice on here, but now I'm more careful as quite often you're effectively giving away the money you would have earned

Ok so because the monetary system was created before I was born, that means it is a fraud?

Not so great logic demonstrated there.

Perhaps the Fed will be destroyed in a 'terror attack' so as all of the records are destroyed.[/QUOTE]



Interesting and could be true:2 cents:

That's the thing. I'd say most people have no clue that the game is fixed.

What would Tyler Durden do?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LWYChQCRT0...t_club_020.jpg

I think of it somewhat like what you just said, but model it out like this.

divide people down the median line - the bottom half are just stupid, and you cant fix stupid.

of the top half, the large majority, 90%, actually DO know the game is fixed, but they dont know how it's fixed, they dont know the details - and they don't care, they DONT WANT TO KNOW, as long as noone is pushing them away from the hog trough. So, you could say they know it's fixed, but act as if they don't, because it's to their immediate benefit to suppress that knowledge as long as noone is taking away their stuff.

of the 10% who know it's fixed, and know something about how the fix works, 90% still don't care, again, because the benefits are too great.

this is the overall problem with complaining about the fed - over the past decades, the benefits have been so great, that it's a waste of time complaining. yes, the priviledged few get the best part of the bargain, but we humans have been living in a pryamidal society for thousands of years.

complaining about the central bankers and the "5000" (or whatever you want to call them) and their servitor class is a dead end unless you have a clear plan for an obviously better replacement.

and thats not something we see in these kinds of discussions. nobody has a workable plan for an alternative, so it all becomes just silly, the dissatisfied bleating of sheep.