Did the U.N. Arms Treaty get signed? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

helterskelter808 · 07-28-2012, 01:41 PM

Didn't he say "pull it"? Surely if it was about firefighters it would be "pull them", or "pull them out". And yep, just because there are some nutty 9/11 theories put out there to piss in the pool, doesn't mean WTC7 wasn't shady as fuck.

DWB · 07-28-2012, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Didn't he say "pull it"? Surely if it was about firefighters it would be "pull them", or "pull them out". And yep, just because there are some nutty 9/11 theories put out there to piss in the pool, doesn't mean WTC7 wasn't shady as fuck.

WTC7 is indeed shady is fuck. The whole day is shady, but even if you take the official story as the truth, WTC7 still is shady.

theking · 07-28-2012, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB

WTC7 is indeed shady is fuck. The whole day is shady, but even if you take the official story as the truth, WTC7 still is shady.

Only to nutters like yourself.

wehateporn · 07-28-2012, 03:37 PM

It was actually you who raised that particular scenario in this thread. I can't see that I've mentioned it here apart from replying to you?

Personally I'd be more interested in the 'Bird Flu' agenda as that will bring far greater death toll and we keep seeing 'Bird Flu' propaganda popping up, so it's clearly still being planned.

The Olympics scenario is highly relevant too for obvious reasons, but also because Iran's alley Syria is now being destabilized, which means we must be very close to the time when the war on Iran is scheduled in. The world is not ready for war with Iran, some type of false flag is required to get the whole thing kicked off, just as 9/11 was used to kick-start the War on Terror. Now would be an ideal time for a false flag, but so would the coming months, anytime before it's time to attack Iran. There are rumors that Syria will be attacked in November, you'd expect that after Syria they'd start on Lebanon and not long after would come Iran.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

Do you notice that you don't answer questions directly, rather you shift the focus to say something else instead.

You purposefully chose the worst-case scenario when there are at least four of them and half of them present positive scenarios for the global populace. Your lack of a direct answer to why you only shared that one with us, is very telling. You're no better than the biased sources you use that lift excerpts out of context or fail to give us all the information. You tailor it to specifically to invoke fear and say something it really doesn't say.

Brujah · 07-28-2012, 03:47 PM

You were repeating the 2012 Olympics bombing a few times on this forum. Now that the Olympics is under way I guess that rules that scenario out and you'll move into another scenario.

As I stated earlier though, why don't you give equal interest to the positive scenarios that indicate a good future for everyone? You focus exclusively on the doomsday scenarios and leave those out.

wehateporn · 07-28-2012, 03:49 PM

As for Building 7, it was meant to have United Airlines Flight 93 fly into it. Flight 93 was due to take off at 08:00, but it got delayed until 08:42 due to airport congestion. This meant that it only took off four minutes before American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. 42 minutes behind time, it was not going to be believable that it wouldn't have been shot down before going into WTC7, so it had to be shot down.

This then left the dilemma for Silverstein as to whether WTC7 would still be covered on the insurance, and whether it would still seem legit to control demo the building, which was full of incriminating evidence. So WTC7 didn't go down at the planned time, which led to confusion and the premature announcement of it's collapse by the BBC. (Whoever passed the news to the BBC was reading from a script which had been prepared in advance)

wehateporn · 07-28-2012, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

You were repeating the 2012 Olympics bombing a few times on this forum. Now that the Olympics is under way I guess that rules that scenario out and you'll move into another scenario.

As I stated earlier though, why don't you give equal interest to the positive scenarios that indicate a good future for everyone? You focus exclusively on the doomsday scenarios and leave those out.

As I've said, the key dates to watch out for with the Olympics are 1st August (1/08) and 10th August (10/8) in UK format. These guys love their numerology.

The positive scenarios are there to make it seem like a genuine scenario planning document, rather than a plan for a false flag.

I don't like spending my time writing about any of this stuff, but I have a compulsion towards exposing lies; that's why I expose the true murderers. If nothing bad's going to happen, I'm happy to fully concentrate on my work.

theking · 07-28-2012, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

As for Building 7, it was meant to have United Airlines Flight 93 fly into it. Flight 93 was due to take off at 08:00, but it got delayed until 08:42 due to airport congestion. This meant that it only took off four minutes before American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. 42 minutes behind time, it was not going to be believable that it wouldn't have been shot down before going into WTC7, so it had to be shot down.

This then left the dilemma for Silverstein as to whether WTC7 would still be covered on the insurance, and whether it would still seem legit to control demo the building, which was full of incriminating evidence. So WTC7 didn't go down at the planned time, which led to confusion and the premature announcement of it's collapse by the BBC. (Whoever passed the news to the BBC was reading from a script which had been prepared in advance)

Utter fucking pigshit.

wehateporn · 07-28-2012, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Utter fucking pigshit.

I'm glad to see that this time I earned an "Utter fucking", I know most times you only dish out the "pigshit" part.

07-28-2012, 03:47 PM	#55
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	You were repeating the 2012 Olympics bombing a few times on this forum. Now that the Olympics is under way I guess that rules that scenario out and you'll move into another scenario. As I stated earlier though, why don't you give equal interest to the positive scenarios that indicate a good future for everyone? You focus exclusively on the doomsday scenarios and leave those out. __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

07-28-2012, 03:49 PM	#56
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	As for Building 7, it was meant to have United Airlines Flight 93 fly into it. Flight 93 was due to take off at 08:00, but it got delayed until 08:42 due to airport congestion. This meant that it only took off four minutes before American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. 42 minutes behind time, it was not going to be believable that it wouldn't have been shot down before going into WTC7, so it had to be shot down. This then left the dilemma for Silverstein as to whether WTC7 would still be covered on the insurance, and whether it would still seem legit to control demo the building, which was full of incriminating evidence. So WTC7 didn't go down at the planned time, which led to confusion and the premature announcement of it's collapse by the BBC. (Whoever passed the news to the BBC was reading from a script which had been prepared in advance) __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

07-28-2012, 01:41 PM	#51
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	Didn't he say "pull it"? Surely if it was about firefighters it would be "pull them", or "pull them out". And yep, just because there are some nutty 9/11 theories put out there to piss in the pool, doesn't mean WTC7 wasn't shady as fuck.