Will this also happen? Now that the 2012 Olympics are under way, will 13,000 people die in a bombing?

"The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change. Not surprisingly, this opening series of deadly asynchronous catastrophes (there were more) put enormous pressure on an already overstressed global economy that had entered the decade still in recession."

Maybe you should know the answers first, before you presume you know what you're talking about. One of the earliest reasons was the KKK not wanting blacks to have the freedom to assemble or bear arms.

That's what's called a scenario, certain scenario's are selected to go live, but only insider's know which ones will

Why do you select the doomsday scenario when it's less than half of the possible scenarios presented in the original document. It actually has a lot of great scenarios that improve life on a global scale for everyone, without any central bankers or super elite being part of it. Is it because you want to censor those for the reader, because it doesn't support your pro-doomsday stance?

http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org...eb007cc719.pdf

Do keep in mind that the Rockefeller's are the Central Bankers. They can select whichever one they want, possibly a combination of scenarios. It's about shaping the world into one which benefits them, unfortunately what benefits them normally has the opposite effect on us. Remember these are the same people who funded both World Wars, they are the shapers, they stop at nothing to get what they want.

13,000? That's about four times higher than 9/11. Oklahoma killed 168. Madrid killed 191. London killed 52. Bombs kill people in their hundreds, not thousands.

Do you notice that you don't answer questions directly, rather you shift the focus to say something else instead.

You purposefully chose the worst-case scenario when there are at least four of them and half of them present positive scenarios for the global populace. Your lack of a direct answer to why you only shared that one with us, is very telling. You're no better than the biased sources you use that lift excerpts out of context or fail to give us all the information. You tailor it to specifically to invoke fear and say something it really doesn't say.

what about that english reporter, reporting about building 7 being destroyed that didn't even go down yet in the background of the shot? when you see things like that, you start to question a lot of things ...... or was that bullshit

Building 7 was on fire, and it was already known that it was going to collapse. See details here: http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

The irony of it all, eh?

Didn't he say "pull it"? Surely if it was about firefighters it would be "pull them", or "pull them out". And yep, just because there are some nutty 9/11 theories put out there to piss in the pool, doesn't mean WTC7 wasn't shady as fuck.

WTC7 is indeed shady is fuck. The whole day is shady, but even if you take the official story as the truth, WTC7 still is shady.

Only to nutters like yourself.

It was actually you who raised that particular scenario in this thread. I can't see that I've mentioned it here apart from replying to you?

Personally I'd be more interested in the 'Bird Flu' agenda as that will bring far greater death toll and we keep seeing 'Bird Flu' propaganda popping up, so it's clearly still being planned.

The Olympics scenario is highly relevant too for obvious reasons, but also because Iran's alley Syria is now being destabilized, which means we must be very close to the time when the war on Iran is scheduled in. The world is not ready for war with Iran, some type of false flag is required to get the whole thing kicked off, just as 9/11 was used to kick-start the War on Terror. Now would be an ideal time for a false flag, but so would the coming months, anytime before it's time to attack Iran. There are rumors that Syria will be attacked in November, you'd expect that after Syria they'd start on Lebanon and not long after would come Iran.

You were repeating the 2012 Olympics bombing a few times on this forum. Now that the Olympics is under way I guess that rules that scenario out and you'll move into another scenario.

As I stated earlier though, why don't you give equal interest to the positive scenarios that indicate a good future for everyone? You focus exclusively on the doomsday scenarios and leave those out.

As for Building 7, it was meant to have United Airlines Flight 93 fly into it. Flight 93 was due to take off at 08:00, but it got delayed until 08:42 due to airport congestion. This meant that it only took off four minutes before American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. 42 minutes behind time, it was not going to be believable that it wouldn't have been shot down before going into WTC7, so it had to be shot down.

This then left the dilemma for Silverstein as to whether WTC7 would still be covered on the insurance, and whether it would still seem legit to control demo the building, which was full of incriminating evidence. So WTC7 didn't go down at the planned time, which led to confusion and the premature announcement of it's collapse by the BBC. (Whoever passed the news to the BBC was reading from a script which had been prepared in advance)

As I've said, the key dates to watch out for with the Olympics are 1st August (1/08) and 10th August (10/8) in UK format. These guys love their numerology.

The positive scenarios are there to make it seem like a genuine scenario planning document, rather than a plan for a false flag.

I don't like spending my time writing about any of this stuff, but I have a compulsion towards exposing lies; that's why I expose the true murderers. If nothing bad's going to happen, I'm happy to fully concentrate on my work.

Utter fucking pigshit.

I'm glad to see that this time I earned an "Utter fucking", I know most times you only dish out the "pigshit" part. :thumbsup