Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

Look at this little narcissist ready to have another meltdown. Paul and his wife NEVER, read this again, NEVER said they met you. Paraphrased some of your replies to prove it was impossible too meet you, yes.

The interesting part? You, supposedly setup all this and go to a foreign country for a shoot, eat dinner at his house, watch a game and leave. BUT you have ZERO email's or ANY correspondence leading up to or after the fact. All you have are pictures of Paul that have been posted on here years ago by another nick.

You don't even have supporting pictures of your trip? Who the fuck goes all they way to CZ and only takes pictures of Paul? - Well, of course, that would be TheSquealer. Yup, we believe you!

Originally Posted by gideongallery

btw i love how you use an example where the store itself commits the crime to argue for sanctions against an entity that does not upload infringing content themselves.

an actually analog would be closing down a weed shop because a customer sells coke in the bathroom.

Which btw i think is bullshit argument too

Originally Posted by gideongallery

mega upload complied with dcma take down notices, The pointing to the files/removing only the offending pointers (url) still complied with the dmca remove access option.

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Originally Posted by DTK

ok maybe it was some other board, but you damned well know you said that.

Originally Posted by DTK

What? No response to this? What a surprise.

Originally Posted by gideongallery

vcr sold for 1k each (timeshifting)

diamond rio sold for $32 (format shifting)


both made money from the "unauthorized" use of copy written work

and both fair uses were ultimately established by the courts

If that was actually the rule neither of those things would have happened,.


the courts explicitly prove you wrong.

Originally Posted by gideongallery

already said i never said that

if you want me to say it again

i never made that post, it was not me

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks

- you are pulling numbers out of your ass yourself... and what do you mean: "again"? Please read my
other posts and tell me where did you find me pulling numbers out of my ass before...

Originally Posted by DTK

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...8#post17755215

what is your next lie going to be? you really are a fucked up little piece of shit.

Originally Posted by gideongallery

already said i never said that

if you want me to say it again

i never made that post, it was not me

Originally Posted by gideongallery

not me just someone else who claimed the name on that board.

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

I for sure am not "pro piracy" anything. I just dislike anon troll posers who like to beat-up on 65 year old cancer survivors. Also, who is so mentally distorted for attention, will lie in great detail about being on a shoot and using others photos as part of his lie.

Finally, when questioned to post correspondence, says he deleted them, but still has Paul's photos on his HD after 7 years?

TheSquealer = 5'6" fatass anon clown poser looking for attention.

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

I think he doesn't like me. But then again, he believes the government took advantage of the 9/11 WTC attacks to spontaneously launch a missile at the Pentagon with the intent of hiding some book keeping irregularities, so i'm ok with it.

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

Look at this little narcissist ready to have another meltdown. Paul and his wife NEVER, read this again, NEVER said they met you. Paraphrased some of your replies to prove it was impossible too meet you, yes.

The interesting part? You, supposedly setup all this and go to a foreign country for a shoot, eat dinner at his house, watch a game and leave. BUT you have ZERO email's or ANY correspondence leading up to or after the fact. All you have are pictures of Paul that have been posted on here years ago by another nick.

You don't even have supporting pictures of your trip? Who the fuck goes all they way to CZ and only takes pictures of Paul? - Well, of course, that would be TheSquealer. Yup, we believe you!

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

Fuck off LC you should know better as I corner this anon. Besides re-read what Paul wrote, he was being rhetorical and sarcastic.

Originally Posted by topnotch, standup guy

Somebody using your screenname sure as hell did and, moreover, the wording sounded exactly like your usual tripe.

Having said that:

a) I'm too lazy to search for the precise WJ post.
b) It happed right after you were chased from here, so it might well have been someone trolling you.

Be that as it may.. you, not at all unlike David Duke, have become so intrinsically associated with certain verbiage that - like it or not - you end up owning the words no matter who said them.

That's the way this shit works.

Originally Posted by DTK

i knew you were going to say that. i'm pretty sure i don't believe you.

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

Let me get this straight, believe your interpretation, theSquealer, or Paul's wife? Fuck off clown...he had his chance to post correspondence, but he didn't do it. Why? Because he's lying and just parroting another who "was" there.

Originally Posted by gideongallery

easy enough to prove

try getting the password by entering an email you know belongs to me

you guys have the information to test that out

if you do you will find you will always get the



message

btw that site is mainstream and supports the connect with facebook option so would not use not use the gideon gallery pseudonym or any pseudonym

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

No worries, but I will flip one back at you. I for damn sure not pointing fingers, but what bothers me is when content producers scream (as they should) they're content is being stolen when they did NOTHING as carders used their content.

Meaning, even you have to admit it hard for non-content producers to jump on your anti-tube cause?

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

Not instigating anything personal, just curious on why there was never any talk about collectively cleaning house first. This way you'll get more people receptive to your cause of stopping piracy.

Originally Posted by DWB

Email his boss. The info is on the board.

Originally Posted by gideongallery

want to bet which number is closer to correct

100k says it not 99.999% infringing as you claimed

i have no problem taking that bet because the 70% came from eff claim on behalf of the users who wanted their files back.





so you have access to lawsuits against the individual uploaders


for 100/month you can get any of the takedown services to get all your content down

but that not enough you want to fuck over all the independent artist using mega upload legimately

because you don't want to spend 100/month.





except the fact that 15 year old was featured on reality kings porn site.

The child was raped (statutory rape is still rape)

raping children is worth less then 100/month to you.





except the government shut the site down not mega upload.


fact the entire filelocker industry has been effected by the megaupload takedown
the affiliate programs that allowed artist like dan bull to make money while using the try it if you like donate model have been wiped out.

so the damage to a business model is INDUSTRY wide.

Same principle applies you belong to an industry that allowed 15 year old to be featured in a porn video.






how do you know it is not. The only reason we know about the reality king case was because mother sued reality kings and they were forced to defend themselves in an open court.


Had that not happened no one would have known it about this 15 year old getting raped.

It could be covered up 100 of times a week /day in the entire porn industry.

The file lockers are an open system, they are public to the world, the infringement can be found by anyone (and misrepresented like adult king did when he misrepresented david banners album, and a main stream movie (authorized distribution)as porn/infringement)

http://stopfilelockers.com/filegag-p...vestigation-2/

http://davidbanner.com

The fact is you guys could easily verify identities to the same level as for bonded employees making a formal request for every id associated with social insurance number.

you don't, and you know full well that the substandard validation has a proven record of allowing a 15 year old to get thru. (hell according to the court transcripts reality kings goes above and beyond the industry standard process be requiring multiple ids).

And a kid being raped is way worse then losing a small/medium percentage of your income.

Especially when you take into account the fact that the pornstars who are getting paid only $800/scene could use the same dan bull style technique and make way more money.

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

I just dislike anon troll posers who like to beat-up on 65 year old cancer survivors.

Originally Posted by DWB

That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.

If the post office was mostly used for criminal activities, they would shut it down in a second flat.

Originally Posted by DWB

That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.

If the post office was mostly used for criminal activities, they would shut it down in a second flat.

Originally Posted by Gozarian

Leave it to a blithering Indian from Kenya residing in Canada to tell Americans about US court system and stare decisis. You are like a dog chasing his tail.

Further if you knew a damn thing about Bieyanka Moore, you would know the entire thing was a money grab by her and her duplicitous mother. RK followed ALL applicable laws and reported the incidence to the FBI themselves.

gfy

Originally Posted by Biggy2

What a fucking clown. Hey Kim Dotcom - you know why your site was incredibly popular, and it wasn't because people wanted to share legitimate content they owned.

Originally Posted by gideongallery

Then the same principle applies to companies like mega upload who also fully comply with dmca.

Originally Posted by slapass

It would if they did. They did not. This was pretty provable with the evidence. It was a bad serve on the warrant, not a lack of proof of wrong doing.

Originally Posted by slapass

It would if they did. They did not. This was pretty provable with the evidence. It was a bad serve on the warrant, not a loack of proof of wrong doing.

Originally Posted by Nautilus

"What about free speech" - yeah, exactly, what about it, where do we see it is either oppressed or restricted? What's wrong with the free speech? Fat fag is speaking freely, even while under investigation. He's posting at some of the most popular sites in the world, addresses people and is allowed to say basically anything he wants. He's even singing and addresses president himself, and quite probably his clip was already seen by president. So wtf is exactly wrong with the free speech? Bloodsucker is enjoying it to the most extreme, when he has something to say - whatever he says gets reported and reposted by thousands of media outlets including even big TV channels sometimes.

Whatever posting a cracked Windows of Photoshop and selling it for profit has to do with the free speach? Because selling of stolen shit is the only thing that the fat fag is accused of doing, and denied of doing. But when HE himself has something to say, which is pretty much different from stealing commercial products such as Windows of Photoshop - he's allowed to say anything, in any form, and basically he's allowed to address the whole world, and he's doing just that. So wtf is wrong with the free speech?