Army Prepares Tanks For War On America

[ninavain]

Shit will hit the fan very soon...when they pull the money supply from the states...most people are 3-9 meals away from anarchy...stay tuned if they don't disrupt your internet

[BlackCrayon]

and alex is your source..hah. hes been saying the same shit for decades, yet it never happens.

[Barry-xlovecam]

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/c...9bb30f31a.html

Is Alex Jones on Meth ... paranoid delusions ... I would be more worried about a foreign peacekeeping mission.

The CIA is probably going to beam footage of this to the Middle East after these reservists learn how to maneuver the rubber tired armed trucks. Tanks my ass their track rips pavement up ...

[~Ray]

Hi,

~Ray

[Rochard]

So the US Army does a training exercise on city streets and.... Suddenly the US military is going to attack the American public? The US Military operates on our streets on a regular basis. I see military convoys all the time.

Some people are just fucking nut jobs.

[Coup]

1orglaugh

[Freaky_Akula]

[Freaky_Akula]

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/8...streetsbut-why

[Tijuana_Tom]

Have you seen what the smallest military base looks like?

It's HUGE.

Why the heck would they need to train on US city streets NOW??

I don't like the idea of the military bringing out tanks like they do in other more scrupulous countries.

[Dcat]

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

and alex is your source..hah. hes been saying the same shit for decades, yet it never happens.

You must live in a fucking bubble of delusion, ..IT IS HAPPENING!! - All around you, wake the fuck up.

[papill0n]

Originally Posted by Tijuana_Tom

Have you seen what the smallest military base looks like?

It's HUGE.

Why the heck would they need to train on US city streets NOW??

I don't like the idea of the military bringing out tanks like they do in other more scrupulous countries.

lol youre talking about your own government possibly preparing for war with its citizens and youre still calling other governments scrupulous

ironically it's unscrupulous but hey thats gfy for ya

[MrCain]

They are learning how to drive those things so they head out into the streets instead of using their own bases. If you think that makes sense, post your email or skype below so I can sell you a bridge.

[BIGTYMER]

Bullshit. Thy don't need tanks.


Drones.

[2MuchMark]

[DWB]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by DWB

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias

Interesting link.

.

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by Dcat

You must live in a fucking bubble of delusion, ..IT IS HAPPENING!! - All around you, wake the fuck up.

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

and alex is your source..hah. hes been saying the same shit for decades, yet it never happens.

damn blind man..Alex Jones is pulling from a video of mainstream news that has since been wiped..he is just showing it

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by MrCain

They are learning how to drive those things so they head out into the streets instead of using their own bases. If you think that makes sense, post your email or skype below so I can sell you a bridge.

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by DWB

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias

Thank you DWB

Jump to: navigation, search

The normalcy bias, or normality bias, refers to a mental state people enter when facing a disaster. It causes people to underestimate both the possibility of a disaster occurring and its possible effects. This often results in situations where people fail to adequately prepare for a disaster, and on a larger scale, the failure of governments to include the populace in its disaster preparations. The assumption that is made in the case of the normalcy bias is that since a disaster never has occurred then it never will occur. It also results in the inability of people to cope with a disaster once it occurs. People with a normalcy bias have difficulties reacting to something they have not experienced before. People also tend to interpret warnings in the most optimistic way possible, seizing on any ambiguities to infer a less serious situation.



CAUSES:
The normalcy bias may be caused in part by the way the brain processes new data. Research suggests that even when the brain is calm, it takes 8?10 seconds to process new information. Stress slows the process, and when the brain cannot find an acceptable response to a situation, it fixates on a single and sometimes default solution that may or may not be correct. An evolutionary reason for this response could be that paralysis gives an animal a better chance of surviving an attack; predators are less likely to eat prey that isn't struggling


EFFECTS:
The normalcy bias often results in unnecessary deaths in disaster situations. The lack of preparation for disasters often leads to inadequate shelter, supplies, and evacuation plans. Even when all these things are in place, individuals with a normalcy bias often refuse to leave their homes. Studies have shown that more than 70% of people check with others before deciding to evacuate.[2]

The normalcy bias also causes people to drastically underestimate the effects of the disaster. Therefore, they think that everything will be all right, while information from the radio, television, or neighbors gives them reason to believe there is a risk. This creates a cognitive dissonance that they then must work to eliminate. Some manage to eliminate it by refusing to believe new warnings coming in and refusing to evacuate (maintaining the normalcy bias), while others eliminate the dissonance by escaping the danger. The possibility that some may refuse to evacuate causes significant problems in disaster planning.

[ninavain]

BYE BYE FREEDOM...HERE IS ANOTHER MAINSTREAM NEWSMAN ( WHO WAS LATER FIRED)...BUT GET USE TO THE US MILITARY TAKING ALL YOUR SHIT..Including your guns for starters
Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law ( signed on DEC 31 2011 New Year's Eve..when no one was looking) Look folks it's happening whether you believe it or not


Gun seizure during Katrina

[DWB]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Interesting link.

.

Yea, it is a bizarre human reaction.

One recent example of this would be the people you saw being rescued from roof tops after Katrina, even though they were warned repeatedly and told to leave for their own safety.

[BlackCrayon]

Originally Posted by Dcat

You must live in a fucking bubble of delusion, ..IT IS HAPPENING!! - All around you, wake the fuck up.

yes and heroes like alex are the only ones going to save us!

[ninavain]

Glenn Beck, FEMA Camps - "They're making me say this.. help!!!"


Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!




look up all the info on FEMA camps you will have a tough time, saying this is a myth

[Mr Pheer]

The battlefield has changed, in case you guys have not noticed. Combat happens in the urban environment now. It makes sense that they would train in an urban environment. You train like you fight. It's much cheaper to drive the vehicles down the street than to ship them and the personel to a base with a MOUT training facility, of which only exist on 2 bases in the USA that I know of.

And get a clue... US troops are US citizens. Very few will attack other US citizens on US soil. The military knows this, because they have directly asked the troops. Some said yes they would, the overwhelming majority said they would not follow orders to attack US citizens.

Take off your foil hats and let some common sense soak in.

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon

yes and heroes like alex are the only ones going to save us!

no..WE need to SAVE US.. he's just one of many alternative news sources that are trying to show us the mainstream networks will not allow.. but feel free to remain blind..that will leave more food for the rest of us

[sandman!]

im not worried

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

And get a clue... US troops are US citizens. Very few will attack other US citizens on US soil. The military knows this, because they have directly asked the troops. Some said yes they would, the overwhelming majority said they would not follow orders to attack US citizens.

Take off your foil hats and let some common sense soak in.

oh boy...the next show you are about to see it called RUDE AWAKENING..I hope you enjoy

[RyuLion]

Yawnnn.......

[Mr Pheer]

Originally Posted by ninavain

oh boy...the next show you are about to see it called RUDE AWAKENING..I hope you enjoy

You should be far, far more afraid of the police than of our troops.

I've been a soldier, have you? I think I know more of what I'm talking about.

[papill0n]

im with mr pheer - how ridiculous to think the us army will be turning on its own citizens in act of repression or aggression

[papill0n]

i love the wiki links too - the example was used in reference to jews who actually were getting killed. something was actually happening. people were displaying the normalcy effect in response to an actual event.

in this case nobody is in a state of denial because nothing is happening.

[beemk]

Originally Posted by papill0n

im with mr pheer - how ridiculous to think the us army will be turning on its own citizens in act of repression or aggression

There's plenty of people who would turn on their own country, soldiers would probably be the last to do so. They put their lives on the line to protect us.

[theking]

Originally Posted by ninavain

oh boy...the next show you are about to see it called RUDE AWAKENING..I hope you enjoy

You are just another nutcase spewing out more pigshit.

[Failed]

I was in a heated debate with a marine friend of mine. He ended the debate with the statement, "I'm sworn to protect the republic, not the people." I think that pretty much sums it all up.

[DBS.US]

Originally Posted by papill0n

im with mr pheer - how ridiculous to think the us army will be turning on its own citizens in act of repression or aggression

The government made the smart meter and told everyone "it will save you money" and 99% of the people said sure I'll take one. Put a little sugar on anything and people will eat it up.

[papill0n]

Originally Posted by beemk

There's plenty of people who would turn on their own country, soldiers would probably be the last to do so. They put their lives on the line to protect us.

absolutely.

[Mr Pheer]

Originally Posted by Failed

I was in a heated debate with a marine friend of mine. He ended the debate with the statement, "I'm sworn to protect the republic, not the people." I think that pretty much sums it all up.

The oath of enlistment does not say anything about protecting a republic.

[papill0n]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

The oath of enlistment does not say anything about protecting a republic.

dont let facts get in the way here

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by papill0n

in this case nobody is in a state of denial because nothing is happening.

Ok buddy...whatever helps you sleep at night

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

You should be far, far more afraid of the police than of our troops.

I've been a soldier, have you? I think I know more of what I'm talking about.

This is a soldier and many more are speaking up...don't just leave the debate on this thread...seek the videos out yourself...I did and my eyes are wide open


Soldier speaks out about 2012 and FEMA and NWO Elites. He quits and throws medals

[eroticsexxx]

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

The battlefield has changed, in case you guys have not noticed. Combat happens in the urban environment now. It makes sense that they would train in an urban environment. You train like you fight. It's much cheaper to drive the vehicles down the street than to ship them and the personel to a base with a MOUT training facility, of which only exist on 2 bases in the USA that I know of.

And get a clue... US troops are US citizens. Very few will attack other US citizens on US soil. The military knows this, because they have directly asked the troops. Some said yes they would, the overwhelming majority said they would not follow orders to attack US citizens.

Take off your foil hats and let some common sense soak in.

OH NOW I SEE...All the countries we are in conflict with LOOK JUST LIKE DOWNTOWN ST. LOUIS I GET IT now buddy.. tell me this G.I.Joe if people are not able to get their money for gas or food...what will happen? The troops will have to come out and keep the peace..do you think angry hungry people will just sit there and salute?

more to chew on

[Mr Pheer]

I'd love to sit here and debate this all day, but I'm in the middle of building a drone (seriously) and I have to go get parts before the electronics store closes. Be back this evening.

[DWB]

Originally Posted by papill0n

im with mr pheer - how ridiculous to think the us army will be turning on its own citizens in act of repression or aggression

Do you mean "ridiculous" as in 1970 Kent State ridiculous, where The National Guard shot and killed four students?

Or do you mean "ridiculous" as in something like this:

U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets when they take up arms with al-Qaida, top national security lawyers in the Obama administration said Thursday.

***

The government lawyers, CIA counsel Stephen Preston and Pentagon counsel Jeh Johnson ? said U.S. citizens do not have immunity when they are at war with the United States.

source

I don't know what the future holds, but you can bet your ass if it is for the military to do what they are training them to do right now, it will be done. Maybe not by all of them, but by many.

Not sure how much you know about the history of battle, but starting back in the Civil War days, it was found that many muskets were double loaded. That means they were not fired, but loaded again. The point is, they would not fire on each other. Off the top of my head I don't remember the figure, but it was a staggering number, something like 40% would not shoot. Through the wars the military notices this problem and through "repetitive training" they were able to get their men to shoot around 95% of the time in Vietnam. Each war prior to Vietnam was better than the last, as they improved their training.

What does that mean? That means through repetitive training the military has learned how to train their soldiers to shoot and kill without giving it a whole lot of thought. Don't think for a second if that order is ever given (I don't personally think it will be), that most of them won't react simply due to their training. When the bells ring, the dogs will come running. Hesitation will be trained out of most of them, if it hasn't been already. That is the job of the military, as soldiers are of no use if they can not follow orders and the chain of command.

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by DWB

Do you mean "ridiculous" as in 1970 Kent State ridiculous, where The National Guard shot and killed four students?

Or do you mean "ridiculous" as in something like this:


source

I don't know what the future holds, but you can bet your ass if it is for the military to do what they are training them to do right now, it will be done. Maybe not by all of them, but by many.

Not sure how much you know about the history of battle, but starting back in the Civil War days, it was found that many muskets were double loaded. That means they were not fired, but loaded again. The point is, they would not fire on each other. Off the top of my head I don't remember the figure, but it was a staggering number, something like 40% would not shoot. Through the wars the military notices this problem and through "repetitive training" they were able to get their men to shoot around 95% of the time in Vietnam. Each war prior to Vietnam was better than the last, as they improved their training.

What does that mean? That means through repetitive training the military has learned how to train their soldiers to shoot and kill without giving it a whole lot of thought. Don't think for a second if that order is ever given (I don't personally think it will be), that most of them won't react simply due to their training. When the bells ring, the dogs will come running. Hesitation will be trained out of most of them, if it hasn't been already. That is the job of the military, as soldiers are of no use if they can not follow orders and the chain of command.

in Facebook speak.."LIKE"

[teennutsuckers]

we shall see

[Freaky_Akula]

[ninavain]

Originally Posted by Freaky_Akula

[Ethnic Luxury]

LMAO...The army as an organization will not mobilize against us civilians smh. Under NO orders may the army as an "organization" turn arms on civilians (that is the duty of law enforcement). Even if such an order were given, you honestly think that an "order" would outweigh the duty to their families/friends/fellow soldiers?

The govt. is the issue, not the army. Outside of contractors, the army has very little to do with the workings of civilians. That's generally left to the reservists of the military.

Illegal detention = CIA
Illegal hits (murders) = FBI/CIA/Presidential Cabinet
Anti-Protest laws = secret service/presidential cabinet
Phone-taps = can't disclose

There are many more violations of the constitution...but no point in going through it all.
Soldiers/Marines...truth be told, most despise the government more than you do. Any veteran can tell you the dumb shit we deal/dealt with on the daily. Fight for the people, fuck the system.

Point is...yes the government sucks but you have nothing to fear from the army.

As for tanks, yes the tanks are being mobilized...but not to be used in this country. Our government has always been war-mongers, does it really surprise you that we are gearing for another war?

Obviously none of you have been to the Fort Hood area (biggest army post with a heavy amount of infantry). It is very common to see combat as well as non-combat vehicles roaming the civilian areas. Anything from black hawks and apaches to LMTVs, Hum-Vs, tanks and etc.

-Veteran, ex M.I with valid TS clearance.

I am an American Soldier
I am a warrior and a member of a team
I SERVE the people of the united states and live the army values