It demonstrates what people experienced themselves and relate to and hold bias in favor of.

You were mutilated. Go look up the definition.

Your last paragraph is simple.
Uncut individuals feel sensation that is clearly derived from their foreskin.
It's a 360 massage essentially. As a matter of simple deduction, circumcision denies people that ability, on purpose, for the same reason they hack of clitorises. Not complicated.

Terrorist is spot on! :thumbsup

are all you dicks still at this ?:helpme

I don't know why would you subject you little baby to even more pain. Poor little guys already in pain due to constipation, jaundice and god know what else.

There is less sensation and that could be good thing and will keep you going longer. Don't you gay guys have that anal cream that numbs shit down? Some condoms have lubricant just for that too.

I know plenty of cut guys that prefer uncut and vice versa so your first argument is moot.

Secondly, a warm hole does all those things you describe. Whacking off could be different I guess but that is what your palm and lotion are for. I have tons of sensation in my head. Sometimes too much.

There is anal ease but never used it. Trust me, if I am overly excited I do need something to slow me down and I have no foreskin.

Also when a girl gets her clit circumcised at best sex is painful at worst she can never have it again. Comparing them is ignorant.

Filthy uncut canadian animals, Hitler gassed the wrong people.

http://i.imgur.com/cZMAo.jpg

All this talk has made me really think.. After doing a ton of reading I'm thinking about doing the tug. Non-surgical reversal. Takes a long time but can restore much of the lost sensitivity. If I do my frenulum is intact thankfully.

I love the look of my cut penis but I'd rather have the sensitivity.

We should leave the genitals of animals and children alone

Either way it s fine, who cares about the fucking looks seriously?
I am uncut and i was always told i had a nice Cock.
And as far as 'Dick Cheese' goes, just take a shower every day and that shouldn't happen :2 cents:

tell that to close minded people like baddog. He says most women think uncut dicks are nasty. I am wondering why he is so interested in this matter that he has asked multiple women about uncut dicks. And how he managed to find so much dumb women who are prejudiced about something they probably never had upin their snatch. If they have and still have this same point of view, then they are even more lost and simple minded.

What i find weird, is that the jewish community has so much influence on america that their religious custom translated to something common among the US western civilization. They chop off skin now without any reason at all, and noone seems to question why the fuck they do it. Without the religious argument, it's an extremely weird thing to do. But everyone says it's normal. The ultimate paradox.

Interesting to see how it's viewed by the National Health Service in the UK, in particular the last line

"most healthcare professionals now agree that the risks associated with routine circumcision, such as infection and excessive bleeding, outweigh any potential benefits"

Routine circumcision

"During the 19th century, many medical practitioners believed that being circumcised was more hygienic than not being circumcised.

As a result, the routine medical circumcision of all boys, regardless of religious faith, became a widespread practice in England. However, routine male circumcision gradually became less common as many members of the medical community began to argue that it had no real medical benefit in the vast majority of cases.

Routine circumcision may offer a number of potential benefits, such as reducing the risk of some types of infections. However, most healthcare professionals now agree that the risks associated with routine circumcision, such as infection and excessive bleeding, outweigh any potential benefits."

Yeah.. I thought they would cut it short ....

[QUOTE=nico-t;19028550]

What i find weird, is that the jewish community has so much influence on america that their religious custom translated to something common among the US western civilization. They chop off skin now without any reason at all, and noone seems to question why the fuck they do it. Without the religious argument, it's an extremely weird thing to do. But everyone says it's normal. The ultimate paradox.[/QUOT]

But off course, lets blame the Jews, what about 2.1 billion Muslims? no influance?

BTW- whenever i see a thread started by wehateporn it will always end up being about race ( jews), religious (jewish) and conspiracy (Jewish plan) why dont you change your Nick to wehatejews and come out already fucktard?

ohh i'm a Jew and cut, no complains so far but you guys will be the first ones to know if i do have issues with it

I have no control over what other people post in threads that I've created, perhaps you've been skimming the threads without seeing who's posting what :2 cents:

I agree.

Im cut and so is my son.

Little kids they harm at.

http://xxxbunker.com/kandi_milan_and_dirty_harry-1.jpg


End of discussion.

My future kids will have their own choice to choose whatever religion they want.

Don't compromise their immune systems either Emma, the herd has you most covered.

:1orglaugh

Good thinking, if 95% of other kids have had the vaccines, why bother injecting Formaldehyde and Aborted Fetuses into your own kids?

I always say, the best decision is made according to what nature wants as we are part of it. And nature wanted the foreskin, thats why we are born with it. Fuck you.

This. Let them decide.

Cutting children genitals at the age they cant decide themselves is such an astrocity as CP or tyranny.

SpicyM, congrats on biggest load of bollocks today :thumbsup

Well, bad dog is like 85 years old and back than it was known for "health reason, prevent masturbation" and all that.. Now that we know its all BS why would you hurt your newborn baby?

lol @ everyone who thinks the only reason any baby boys are circumcised is solely on the religious beliefs of the parents :1orglaugh

nice sensationalism johnny, because cutting off the skin surrounding the head is *exactly* the same as cutting off 'a lot of a child's dick' :1orglaugh

You people have way too much time on your hands if you are getting this riled up over male circumcision.

Every time this thread starts up you have the same butthurt alien cock owners crying :1orglaugh

Just when I think the world wasn't any weirder then I remember there is a religion that chops of parts of the penis...


man its a confusing world we live in.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

What does it come down to then, other than religion?

Is it health?

if/when i have a boy i plan to get him cut for the only reason that the ladies dig it more. nothing religious at all.

scotty - mine was as someone has stated - it was believed to be 'healthier' regarding STD's, hygiene, back in 1972, at least by my parents (rightly or wrongly).

Johnny, yeah I'm fine with the fact my parents decided to have me circumcised because they believe(d) it was healthier for me, and it would have precisely zero impact on either my cock, or my life :thumbsup

As I said earlier, they have you by the foreskin.

Inaccurate. More women prefer an uncircumcised penis, which is a totally different statement of fact.

Yes it's a statement of adverse conditioning to favor mutilation.

dont get your panties in a bunch. I doubt american culture is influenced by muslims to cut off foreskin :1orglaugh it's not a 'blame'. I dont have a clue what the other reason would be for non-religious to cut off foreskin. I read in this thread it's probably also based on ancient hygiene issues, but that's based on medieval times where people didn't have showers I guess.

the weird brainwashed ladies I guess. Around here you are the abnormal one when you're cut. So you have to keep him in the US when you get him cut because in any other western country it's the opposite. Well, apart from the muslim invasion here of whom it's expected ofcourse.