|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Canon 1.4 50mm lens... Anyone??
Anyone here shooting on a Canon 1.4 50mm?
We're using the 1.8 and wondering how much more amazing the 1.4 is...? Is it really mind-blowing as people on youtube say? Thanks for your take on this...
__________________
--- Ethnic niche? Black-Asian-Latina ? Contact me and lets talk traffic. rockreed@ that thing they call the google mail When you E-mail Me, PLZZZZ make the Subject Title: >>>>>> GFY! So I do not lose you in Spam. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 437
|
Depth of field the width of an eyelash, good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A magical land
Posts: 15,808
|
It's the l series 1.2 you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Can't afford the 1.2...
Is the depth of field really that short??? FUCK!
__________________
--- Ethnic niche? Black-Asian-Latina ? Contact me and lets talk traffic. rockreed@ that thing they call the google mail When you E-mail Me, PLZZZZ make the Subject Title: >>>>>> GFY! So I do not lose you in Spam. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
After using it for a few months... its pretty damn short.
__________________
--- Ethnic niche? Black-Asian-Latina ? Contact me and lets talk traffic. rockreed@ that thing they call the google mail When you E-mail Me, PLZZZZ make the Subject Title: >>>>>> GFY! So I do not lose you in Spam. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Show Yer Tits!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere Out there...
Posts: 25,792
|
Sample pic?
__________________
![]() Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,569
|
Not that different, little better bokeh..
still fragile focus motor.. Look at the sigma 50mm 1.4 - but you might need MFA since they can have front focus/rear focus issues |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Haters & Trolls SUCK!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,275
|
It's great for low-light shooting with a very VERY shallow depth of field. I don't use it much because paysite members whine & complain about the focus. They say stuff like "OMG, can somebody show Dean Capture how to focus his camera"?
![]() In all seriousness, it's a beautiful lens for the money |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 314
|
How often do you actually shoot that open though? My fastest is 1.8 but it is very rare indeed that I shoot at that, nailing focus is just too hard except for very static controlled portraits and stuff like that.
__________________
sponsors who make me money |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Yeah, I agree guys.... I'm thinking about selling it... I don't think I need it.
I just wanted to try it.
__________________
--- Ethnic niche? Black-Asian-Latina ? Contact me and lets talk traffic. rockreed@ that thing they call the google mail When you E-mail Me, PLZZZZ make the Subject Title: >>>>>> GFY! So I do not lose you in Spam. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
|
Would love to see some samples.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Amateur Pimpin
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 13,075
|
Don't waste your money, if you're not using the 1.2 L then what's the point of hitting that dof when your quality is shit?
__________________
Make easy money with Webcams |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 25,924
|
i have a nikkor 50mm 1.4 and the pics are really awesome, so hard to dont take a good pic with this lens
__________________
Beautiful And Usable Web Design Creations For The Adult Industry Since 2003
I'm Yuu, Designer and Content Producer Paysites - Affiliate Programs - Dating & Cam Sites - Mainstream Projects - Tube Sites - Banners - Wordpress Themes - NATs integration - Landing Pages Check my Portfolio and Content Production Offers |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 673
|
The Canon 85mm 1.2 II is so much better. Once you use this lens you will not worry about shallow DOF. Just keep in mind.. its all about your distance from the subject.
Stay 5 feet away from your subject and every bit of that subject will be in full tight focus at f/1.2 Only when you step in closer than 5 feet will you have parts of the subject out of focus. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...f_1_2L_II.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,564
|
Better to save your money and use a f2.8 lens.
Most lenses are very good, and no one can tell what lens was used to take a photograph. There are just too many other factors that effect quality. When a person brags about what lenses they use you know you are talking to someone who never really understood what photography is. Original ideas and creativity make great photography not the resolution and contrast of one lens in comparison to another. |
|
|
|