Has GW destroyed her business?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tijuana_Tom
    So Fucking Banned
    • May 2011
    • 668

    #421
    LOL @ Fris' army of fake nicks, trolls and surfers.

    Comment

    • Quagmire
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2005
      • 6490

      #422
      Originally posted by Tijuana_Tom
      LOL @ Fris' army of fake nicks, trolls and surfers.
      Holy shit you're miserable. Did your dad rape you in the pee hole with a pen as a child?

      Comment

      • Tijuana_Tom
        So Fucking Banned
        • May 2011
        • 668

        #423
        Originally posted by Quagmire
        Holy shit you're miserable. Did your dad rape you in the pee hole with a pen as a child?
        What the hell kind of comment is that?

        You are another idiot that's been owned on this forum 100x

        You fit right in with Fris Army.

        Comment

        • Quagmire
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2005
          • 6490

          #424
          Originally posted by Tijuana_Tom
          What the hell kind of comment is that?

          You are another idiot that's been owned on this forum 100x

          You fit right in with Fris Army.
          Uh huh. And yet here we are with you being the one under the fake nick after being banned several times.

          I've hit a nerve wit the pen in the pee hole comment. Sorry about your rough childhood.

          Comment

          • ShoeBox
            So Fucking Banned
            • May 2012
            • 2056

            #425
            Originally posted by Quagmire
            Uh huh. And yet here we are with you being the one under the fake nick after being banned several times.

            I've hit a nerve wit the pen in the pee hole comment. Sorry about your rough childhood.
            settle down kids

            Comment

            • Tijuana_Tom
              So Fucking Banned
              • May 2011
              • 668

              #426
              Originally posted by Quagmire
              Uh huh. And yet here we are with you being the one under the fake nick after being banned several times.

              I've hit a nerve wit the pen in the pee hole comment. Sorry about your rough childhood.
              Fail assumptions by fail trolls.

              Comment

              • Tijuana_Tom
                So Fucking Banned
                • May 2011
                • 668

                #427
                Originally posted by ShoeBox
                settle down kids
                Someone should have said that to you little Queers 3 days ago.

                Comment

                • ShoeBox
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • May 2012
                  • 2056

                  #428
                  Originally posted by Tijuana_Tom
                  Someone should have said that to you little Queers 3 days ago.


                  Comment

                  • ShoeBox
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • May 2012
                    • 2056

                    #429
                    Originally posted by Tijuana_Tom
                    Someone should have said that to you little Queers 3 days ago.

                    Comment

                    • AdultKing
                      Raise Your Weapon
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 15601

                      #430
                      Originally posted by gimme-website
                      That is exactly how I understood the situation to be.....

                      But we are both idiots right???

                      Yeah that wasnt a direct quote from candy.. just what my concensus from our convo was.
                      No, Brujah is completely correct and is saying what I have been trying to tell you for several pages of this thread.

                      The test of whether it is standalone and not derivative of Wordpress is whether it works the same without Wordpress. Obviously an image works the same with or without Wordpress.

                      Comment

                      • barcodes
                        Confirmed User
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 2040

                        #431
                        I haven't used anything from the package yet and now that I am reading more and more of this stuff, I am curious if its legal or not. I could care less about the 50 bucks and I won't ask for a refund even if he fucked up but I am curious if I would be using this stuff illegally.

                        Here are a few links from theme forest.

                        http://blog.themeforest.net/site-new...y-please-read/

                        http://themeforest.net/licenses/regular_extended

                        So, if I look at the theme forest themes, there are include folders with js/images/css etc., so does that mean that I legally should not be using it? I am a bit confused now because initially, people here decided that it was ok. Now though, it seems like people are saying its ok if it wasn't under a split license, but theme forest is all under split license and the packages have files under said license. (js/images/stylesheets). Again, I am not trying to get my money back, I just want to know if I should not use certain things from this package, or just throw the whole thing away, or what.

                        I unzipped one of the themes to show what I am referring to in case I am saying it wrong.



                        which is for this theme:
                        http://themeforest.net/item/locus-re...s-theme/112800

                        Thanks in advance for any clarification you can give me regarding useability.
                        Last edited by barcodes; 06-16-2012, 10:09 PM.

                        Comment

                        • barcodes
                          Confirmed User
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 2040

                          #432
                          Lol, I once made a rough for a client using one of ghetty's images (with the watermark intact) and saved a proof as a jpeg on a site for the client to see it. Ghetty somehow found it two days later and threatened to sue our company. After talking to someone on their legal side for like an hour , my boss was able to get them to not sue us and just remove proof from the web. Even after explaining the purpose of the site and that it was only a screenshot, they were still thoroughly pissed lol.

                          This image was used for a part of the header. the jpeg I saved was from my layout psd file, it wasnt the stock image posted on the proof site. How the fuck did they find it?! lmao.

                          there are ways for people to find their shit and I just don't want to be threatened legally again lol, which is why I even mentioned anything.
                          Last edited by barcodes; 06-16-2012, 10:16 PM.

                          Comment

                          • ShoeBox
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • May 2012
                            • 2056

                            #433
                            Originally posted by barcodes
                            Lol, I once made a rough for a client using one of ghetty's images (with the watermark intact) and saved a proof as a jpeg on a site for the client to see it. Ghetty somehow found it two days later and threatened to sue our company. After talking to someone on their legal side for like an hour , my boss was able to get them to not sue us and just remove proof from the web. Even after explaining the purpose of the site and that it was only a screenshot, they were still thoroughly pissed lol.

                            This image was used for a part of the header. the jpeg I saved was from my layout psd file, it wasnt the stock image posted on the proof site. How the fuck did they find it?! lmao.

                            there are ways for people to find their shit and I just don't want to be threatened legally again lol, which is why I even mentioned anything.


                            Comment

                            • barcodes
                              Confirmed User
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 2040

                              #434
                              just to clarify, the ghetty image was used in the header for a proof before us buying it. the stock image was a crazy amount of money, like 300 dollars or something and we wanted to be sure the client, who wanted that image and no other, was totally happy with how it looked before purchasing it.

                              Comment

                              • Nasty
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 1575

                                #435
                                Originally posted by barcodes
                                just to clarify, the ghetty image was used in the header for a proof before us buying it. the stock image was a crazy amount of money, like 300 dollars or something and we wanted to be sure the client, who wanted that image and no other, was totally happy with how it looked before purchasing it.
                                Getty Images will threaten to sue you for their images even if you did pay for them, its part of their business model I think lol

                                “Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living. If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” ― Omar Bradley (1948)

                                Comment

                                Working...