GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What Martial Art should I take? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=107081)

AOLGuy 02-12-2003 01:34 PM

note:

no matter how tempting it may be to join Johnny and his gang - do not.

Sensei Kreese will not teach you true Karate.

His "Mercy is for the weak, your enemy deserves no mercy" mantras may SOUND tempting, but they are not your path to inner balance.

railz 02-12-2003 01:40 PM

I started with Okinawan Goji-Ru, moved to TWD and then finally to Akido-Jistu.

I enjoyed all three, but Akido-Jitsu was an absolute blast.

Voodoo 02-12-2003 01:41 PM

Hawaiian Kempo

WC Support 02-12-2003 01:47 PM

Your best bets are going to be:

Brazilian Jiu-jitsu - Make sure you find a credible instructor. I studied in a Caique JJ association and it is very good bjj.

Muay Thai - Brutal sport. As far as striking martial arts, it is tops.

Boxing - Awesome striking, and memberships are generally very cheap as they are in inner cities.

Judo - also good ground grappling like BJJ, but also offers high impact throws.

Stay away from McDojos like the tae kwon do and karate schools that are on every corner. There is a reason everyone and their brother has a black belt in those styles... anyone can get one and they dont mean much if you actually want to defend yourself.

Anna_O 02-12-2003 01:47 PM

My BF trained Shoot Fighting for a while... That's what all those Japaneese dudes in UFC does. Much like Brazilian Jiu Jutsu but without the Gi. (you train in shorts with no T-shirt). It was very fun to watch him peactice. Imagine a room filled with ten sweaty men with toned muscles, wrestling and hugging each other :Graucho

WC Support 02-12-2003 01:49 PM

I used to teach shootfighting (Frank Shamrock style). Very good stuff, although Ive found they are not as technically sound as BJJers. The top shootfighters are phenomenal athletes, and the mediocre guys cant hang with BJJers of the same experience.

Good style though

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 01:50 PM

Jiu-Jitsu versus Judo....
dunno which is best....

however, a fight with the world's best Judoka and the best Jiu-Jitsu guy.... and im putting my money on the Judoka...

Since more people practice JUdo... the odds are the the olympic champion (heavyweight category) would kick anyone ass....

Libertine 02-12-2003 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Jiu-Jitsu versus Judo....
dunno which is best....

however, a fight with the world's best Judoka and the best Jiu-Jitsu guy.... and im putting my money on the Judoka...

Since more people practice JUdo... the odds are the the olympic champion (heavyweight category) would kick anyone ass....

LOL

Find out how Judo originated, and you'll have your answer.

WC Support 02-12-2003 01:54 PM

Look at what the emphasis is on judo and BJJ. Is it a throwing match? yes, Judo will win... but BJJ is almost all groundwork, and Ive seen BJJ white belts like BJ Penn enter black belt judo tournaments and choke them all unconscious.

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WC Support
Look at what the emphasis is on judo and BJJ. Is it a throwing match? yes, Judo will win... but BJJ is almost all groundwork, and Ive seen BJJ white belts like BJ Penn enter black belt judo tournaments and choke them all unconscious.
well, there's different way you can teach Judo....
one black belt from one place can get his ass kick from a blue belt of another place....

I recently check out a class... where the teacher ( trained, fought and is a good friend with current world Judoka champion Nicolas Gill... )

and he was teaching a more full contact type of JUdo... where you could kick the other in the legs... etc... and let me tell you that he could have break my shinbone in an instant....

WC Support 02-12-2003 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net


well, there's different way you can teach Judo....

I know there are schools that emphasize ne waza alot more, and I have total respect for Judo. I just prefer BJJ, and it has been tested in actual fighting where as Judo hasnt done much yet.

Takada is making waves though!

CDSmith 02-12-2003 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by -=HOAX=-
Also, in my opinion...disregard belts and katas and that type of shit. Find yourself a teacher dude...someone you are willing to learn from.
Good advice. The kickboxing club I trained at would invite people from many different styles to come and train with us, so a good cross-section of moves was incorporated into our skills... from ju-jitsu (in-close fighting) to sikaran-arnis (Phillipine fighting style literally meaning "feet" and "weapons"), all very effective forms of fighting.


Kickboxing is simply the most direct method of disabling/defeating/killing your opponent, period. People can debate al they want, but unless you've actually fought in the ring against (and using) multiple styles of fighting, you really don't know what you're talking about.

True Thaiwanese boxing is basically the shortest distance between your weapons (fists, feet, knee, elbow, head etc) and your opponent. No fancy dramatic flashy bullshit moves, no belts, no nothing. Just quick concise moves and clever combinations that are very hard to defend against. Coupled with skills associated with other disciplines like I mentioned above and you have a style that is very hard to defeat. And any opponent that employs a style that involves "grabbing" their opponent must first be able to actually grab that opponent. A good kickboxer will be quick enough to hit without allowing his/her opponent to grab onto them.


People like xxxdesign can speculate all they want, but I know what I know. I sugges, like Hoax says, to find a place to train where the focus is on learning the best aspects of many different styles, not on belts and trophies etc. Train hard and long enough and you can enter open-style tournaments, your teacher will be able to tell you what level to enter at, and the trophies will come.

Libertine 02-12-2003 02:04 PM

Judo means "the gentle way". It was developed from Jiu Jitsu to create a safe martial art, of which the "decisive" moves could be executed at full power without being dangerous. That all to make it fit to be a safe competing sport.

In other words, judo is jiu jitsu's gay little brother.

WC Support 02-12-2003 02:07 PM

Actually, as much as I love jui-jitsu, judo is much better than traditional japanese jiu-jitsu. (not brazilian)

Judo branched off from JJJ, and turned it into a sport where they were actually able to test their techniques in live situations, and jiu-jitsu stuck with practice and never developed.

Judo took off as a much bigger thing, and BJJ spawned from that and has become its own thing, taking the ground work of Judo and simplifying and making it work more on leverage than strength.

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith



Kickboxing is simply the most direct method of disabling/defeating/killing your opponent, period.



Why UFC champions are never kickboxers then....?

And ver very very rarely will a fight be won with a kick....

most of the time on the ground.... sometimes with a good punch... :2 cents:

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Judo means "the gentle way". It was developed from Jiu Jitsu to create a safe martial art, of which the "decisive" moves could be executed at full power without being dangerous. That all to make it fit to be a safe competing sport.

In other words, judo is jiu jitsu's gay little brother.


Read my earlier post.... there's different ways of teaching judos....
you have familly classes...
and you have agressive full contact ones....!

WC Support 02-12-2003 02:12 PM

Kickboxing is making its mark in MMA, but as a stand alone art it isnt enough. The only kickboxers that have had any success have also trained in bjj, wrestling, judo, etc so that they can try to stay standing, or at least know what to do on the ground when they get there.

The number one kickboxer in MMA right now is Mirko CroCop and its his takedown and ground defense that makes his kickboxing so effective. Same with Chuck Liddell.

CDSmith 02-12-2003 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Why UFC champions are never kickboxers then....?

And ver very very rarely will a fight be won with a kick....

most of the time on the ground.... sometimes with a good punch... :2 cents:

Why are UFC champions never small guys either? They're all solid ultra-strong hulking brutes that use a combination of wrestling, various hand/knee/foot attacks used by many different styles including kickboxing, and very little finesse or discipline. UFC has very few rules if any. The question here is "which MARTIAL ART should I take?"..... UFC is not a martial art. You're comparing apples to prunes.

WC Support 02-12-2003 02:17 PM

The UFC has many rules now. Almost too many.

They are not brutes either, there are weight classes, just like in boxing. Some of their fighters are 155lbs now, a far cry from the huge streetfighters of the past.

They are definitely martial artists, and they train hard. The difference is they train in REALISTIC martial arts.

CDSmith 02-12-2003 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WC Support
Kickboxing is making its mark in MMA, but as a stand alone art it isnt enough. The only kickboxers that have had any success have also trained in bjj, wrestling, judo, etc so that they can try to stay standing, or at least know what to do on the ground when they get there.

The number one kickboxer in MMA right now is Mirko CroCop and its his takedown and ground defense that makes his kickboxing so effective. Same with Chuck Liddell.

Very much truism here. This is why I recomment kickboxing so highly as a "central style" to learn first. Most other forms of hand-to-hand combat can be learned easily on top of it. Kickboxing meshes well with pretty much any other martial art, from my experience.

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Why are UFC champions never small guys either? They're all solid ultra-strong hulking brutes that use a combination of wrestling, various hand/knee/foot attacks used by many different styles including kickboxing, and very little finesse or discipline. UFC has very few rules if any. The question here is "which MARTIAL ART should I take?"..... UFC is not a martial art. You're comparing apples to prunes.
Sorry but Gracy (im I spelling it right) was a small guy and rellied mostly on BJJ ....

Libertine 02-12-2003 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

Read my earlier post.... there's different ways of teaching judos....
you have familly classes...
and you have agressive full contact ones....!

Because Judo originated in modern times it is organized like other major sports with one international governing body, the International Judo Federation (IJF), and one technical authority (Kodokan). Unlike other martial arts, Judo competition rules, training methods, and rank systems are relatively uniform throughout the world.

Manga1 02-12-2003 02:20 PM

This guy teaches Hapkido in Toronto and is probably the deadliest man alive. A lot of people here are from Toronto so some of you might know his reputation, or might know of a bouncer who has trained under him. When it comes to martial arts there is Master Hwang and then there is everybody else Master Hwang

TDF 02-12-2003 02:23 PM

BVF take up Muay Thai boxing...you wont regret it..

Libertine 02-12-2003 02:23 PM

I have an idea!
Let's all get together on the next convention for some webmaster free-fighting!
Let's see who really know their shit and who are just talking :)

CDSmith 02-12-2003 02:24 PM

Bringing the topic of UFC into this discussion is useless. UFC in and of itself is NOT considered a martial art. There may be rules, but it still resembles street fighting more than anything.

And this discussion shouldn't be about which guy in which style can crush the next guy with a different style, because it's all relative. It depends on a lot of variables. Pitting a grand master of ju-jitsu against a basic black-belt in tae kwon do isn't going to determine much, even if they are at the same weight class.


Again, the original question is "what martial art should I learn?", and I answered it based on my own years of experience with in interacting with many different styles. That's pretty much where it ends for me.

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld


Because Judo originated in modern times it is organized like other major sports with one international governing body, the International Judo Federation (IJF), and one technical authority (Kodokan). Unlike other martial arts, Judo competition rules, training methods, and rank systems are relatively uniform throughout the world.

yes... and this is what I said...
you can be trained for tournaments.... but be teached a more hardcore full contact type.... that you might not use in tournaments...

At least, maybe its unique... but where I went... this is how they functioned.... and the teacher... ( fought with and friend of... the current heavy weight world champ) come up with is own techniques, striking methods, etc....

WC Support 02-12-2003 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Bringing the topic of UFC into this discussion is useless. UFC in and of itself is NOT considered a martial art. There may be rules, but it still resembles street fighting more than anything.


Thats why it is important. It allows you to see what actually works.

Why study a martial art that is proven to not work?

CDSmith 02-12-2003 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WC Support
Why study a martial art that is proven to not work?
That's kind of a foolish statement. Fact is ALL martial arts have some merit to them, even the lowly tai chi.


But until there are dojos springing up all over that teach "Ultimate Fighting Challenge" techniques, I'm still going to have to suggest the best all-round martial art that gives you the most bang for your buck.... Thai boxing.



Btw, I'm not talking about the N. American "McDonald's" version of kickboxing. I'm talking the original Thaiwanese style of fighting, including elbows, knees, the axe kick, etc. The rules are vastly different. As a style for self-defense purposes it is virtually unequaled, and meshes very well with ju-jitsu and other in-close styles.

Triple 6 02-12-2003 03:26 PM

I cant remember names, styles, or what UFC was (either the 1st or 2nd), but I will never forgeth this one match where it was this huge, HUGE fat black guy (sumo) vs this skinny ass white guy... and when they met in the middle, this white guy did a whole bunch of fast hits to the sumo's guys face, I saw teeth flying and all, and the black dude just dropped like a brick.

AOLGuy 02-12-2003 04:05 PM

UFC Bukakke.

Seriously, next Internext - brawls between Webmasters...

Should be funnier than BumFights.

stocktrader23 02-12-2003 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Why are UFC champions never small guys either? They're all solid ultra-strong hulking brutes that use a combination of wrestling, various hand/knee/foot attacks used by many different styles including kickboxing, and very little finesse or discipline. UFC has very few rules if any. The question here is "which MARTIAL ART should I take?"..... UFC is not a martial art. You're comparing apples to prunes.
You are so wrong it is rediculous. UFC has weight classes now and even when they didn't they had a "small guy" kicking ass against the big guys. Royce ring a bell? A boxer or kickboxer has shit against real martial arts.

nikudorei 02-12-2003 04:31 PM

aikido is fun. i used to do it at a university dojo, lots of japanese exchange students who had done it since they were 4 or something. man those small japanese girls could throw me *90kg* around like a ragdoll.

was alot of fun and useful.. i must say again..
heaps of fun.

CDSmith 02-12-2003 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23
You are so wrong it is rediculous. UFC has weight classes now and even when they didn't they had a "small guy" kicking ass against the big guys. Royce ring a bell? A boxer or kickboxer has shit against real martial arts.
Yes, a *spectator* is telling me how wrong I am.



Like I said... when studios start opening that teach UFC, go join up. Until then, I'll stick with recommending people start with what I know to be the best.


Duh.

Bobby Vicious 02-12-2003 05:58 PM

9 mm.:BangBang: :BangBang:

wouncie 02-12-2003 06:52 PM

"Gun-Fu":BangBang:

gothweb 02-12-2003 06:56 PM

You need to learn the ancient Scottish martial art. Fuk-Yu!

sonomasnap 02-12-2003 07:07 PM

When I was in S.F. at the Gracie BJJ school once in awhile we would have some dude walk in from another style and want to challenge a student. Usually they were Black or Brown belts in there style. Gracie would put a blue belt, one above white agains them and the BJJ won every time. The loser would do 1 of two things. Either say they slipped, had a bad day etc.... or ask if they could join the school on the spot.

WC Support knows his shit obviously. And BJJ is all about real fighting and not about the belt, or chants or breathing etc...

Finally, we had a nationally ranked Judo guy in our school and his through skills and shooting skills made him a better BJJ student and he taught us stuff but again, once you are down on the ground where most fights end up it was all BJJ.

UncleJimmy 02-12-2003 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WC Support


Thats why it is important. It allows you to see what actually works.

Why study a martial art that is proven to not work?

Very good point...

:thumbsup :thumbsup

This is my current interest in 'joint' work....cuz I KNOW that works ;)

WC Support 02-12-2003 07:11 PM

CDSmith, Im not sure where you get people are saying "UFC" is a style.

Its not a style... its a competition for people of various styles to compete. Most of the fighters in there are BJJers, thai boxers, etc.... martial artists.

These martial arts ARE taught in schools. Ive been in the martial arts for 25 years and Ive seen just about everything. Yes all arts have merit in some aspect, but most are just not meant for actual fighting. People have seen so damn many kung fu movies they have no idea what is real. Ive known black belts that have never been in a fight in their life, but yet they "know" their style is "deadly". The first time one of these guys gets popped in the nose, he goes down crying. Thats why I cant watch karate tournaments full of "Masters" who drop everytime someone brushes their face.

The only realistic styles, are those that train realistically... and those that are being tested in the UFC are the only ones that do that.

BJJ school... thats a UFC style school.

Muay Thai... thats a UFC style school.

Submission Fighting... thats a UFC style school.

They are sprouting up everywhere and Im glad to see it.

cheese4acp 02-12-2003 07:12 PM

jijitsu....

WC Support 02-12-2003 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sonomasnap
When I was in S.F. at the Gracie BJJ school once in awhile we would have some dude walk in from another style and want to challenge a student. Usually they were Black or Brown belts in there style. Gracie would put a blue belt, one above white agains them and the BJJ won every time. The loser would do 1 of two things. Either say they slipped, had a bad day etc.... or ask if they could join the school on the spot.

WC Support knows his shit obviously. And BJJ is all about real fighting and not about the belt, or chants or breathing etc...

Finally, we had a nationally ranked Judo guy in our school and his through skills and shooting skills made him a better BJJ student and he taught us stuff but again, once you are down on the ground where most fights end up it was all BJJ.

I was at the Gracie Nationals about 3 years ago when some HUUUUUGE body builder came in and challenged Royce. Rorian put his 17 year old son Ryron in with the guy, and Ryron just smoked him. It was hilarious.

xxxdesign-net 02-12-2003 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WC Support


I was at the Gracie Nationals about 3 years ago when some HUUUUUGE body builder came in and challenged Royce. Rorian put his 17 year old son Ryron in with the guy, and Ryron just smoked him. It was hilarious.

But what do you mean by HUGE bodybuilder....

Because yes martial art is extremely effective... however...
even the best BJJ guy in the world.... let say under 5'10, 160lbs will never beat a 6'5'' 290lbs ATHLETIC bodybuilder that can benchpress over 400lbs....

whether its on the ground or standing.... its just physically IMPOSSIBLE....

Ofcourse, im talking about an athletic lean bodybuilder... that is fast and can move... but without any martial art background... against an opponant under 5'10, 160lbs

:2 cents:

Anthony_Whitcon 02-12-2003 07:54 PM

http://www.bullshido.us/dl_showall.a...le+vs%2E+Style

Enough said.

JayJay 02-12-2003 08:07 PM

Martial Art's is for Faggots

WC Support 02-12-2003 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net


But what do you mean by HUGE bodybuilder....

Because yes martial art is extremely effective... however...
even the best BJJ guy in the world.... let say under 5'10, 160lbs will never beat a 6'5'' 290lbs ATHLETIC bodybuilder that can benchpress over 400lbs....

whether its on the ground or standing.... its just physically IMPOSSIBLE....

Ofcourse, im talking about an athletic lean bodybuilder... that is fast and can move... but without any martial art background... against an opponant under 5'10, 160lbs

:2 cents:

He was about 6'6" and at least 260, and Ryron was about 155. Ive tapped out plenty of bodybuilders in my day. Im 5'9" and at the time I was 160... and I used to tap a training partner who was 6'7" and in awesome shape. I could beat him in about 30 seconds every time. Size means nothing without skill.

Muscles dont mean shit if you dont know how to use them in a fight. Fighting isnt a posing contest or bench press contest.

Fletch XXX 02-12-2003 08:09 PM

<a href=http://www.brucelee.com/jeet.htm>Jeet Kun Do</a>

nikudorei 02-12-2003 08:10 PM

bruce rocks.

PornBroker 02-12-2003 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thrawn$
Learn Boxing, a real fighter is a boxer !
http://www.lequipe.fr/Xml/Aussi/Doss...s_droite_2.jpg

I agree. I've been boxing for years.
Like any of these sports, it can be rough on the body.
I am about to have my second shoulder reconstruction.

LBBV 02-12-2003 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by -=HOAX=-
Also, in my opinion...disregard belts and katas and that type of shit. Find yourself a teacher dude...someone you are willing to learn from.

Go to one of those places 3 weeks running, a new spot/style per month. Then after you've checked out all of them decide...


Then again you may not be that into it...you may just wanna fuck around...in that case find the cheapest, fuckit.

I agree...whatever you decide, sit in on a couple of classes. There are dojos all over the place that just put up a sign and teach you moves, but the good ones will spend time with you on all aspects of the art (discipline, strength, form, etc).

The teacher(s) and the format of the class is a very important part. They/it will keep you motivated and focused.

A fair amount of patience is good also


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123