How to shoot better selling porn.

hey paul i just dropped in to remind you you have no traffic

k thx bye

QFT. Shit Paul Markham Porn

I feel sorry for Max Candy, even though he tricked me into spending $45, to be complemented on by Paul Markham must be the kiss of death.

Paul, please feel free to insult the photography and videos of Cinema Erotique as much as you like.

Paul, please post sites of yours which have personality?

This thread is like a vegetarian trying to teach people how to cook steak.

You've got no sites with a jot of personality.

You ruined the thread when you started it. We're just pointing out to the newbs that you are trying to teach them something you've never pulled off.

Oh well, the old saying is right. Those that cannot do, teach.



xoxox

i have no problem to admit that this is what we learned from Paul about 9 years ago - the difference between porn and the picture of a naked woman. or that a fully clothed woman can be much more "porn" than a naked woman with spread legs. and he's right about that.

but i also heard the $3000 per set story nine years ago and that exclusive content is too cheap etc. and i am afraid while the world keeps turning and everything evolves, Paul is stuck in his time bubble somehow

but while Paul and me surely disagree on many things, i still dont get the permanent insults and name calling (from all sides). especially cause no one would do that in real life face to face.

50 insane old men suffering from dementia

I too heard this story 8-9 years ago when in Brno. He couldn't stop talking about how he'd shoot casting sets without paying the models, then sell them as amateur (girl next door) type content to magazines making piles of cash, how he was shooting so much for magazines and making so much money and how shooting for online wasn't very good for him.

At the same time, he was clearly exaggerating everything he was saying, had little money, wasn't really even shooting content (Eva was in spite of him announcing new sets HE shot on GFY, when that wasn't true)... he was frantically trying to launch paysites, he was trying to launch tgps, he was doing his content blowout "me too" thing as he was losing to J$tyles and AaronM at the time as well as those who followed suit and he was trying to lease out his studio to anyone who would lease it.

A year later he was begging for money on GFY to pay his bills.

People react to him as they do because all he does is post insane shit, preach about things he knows nothing about, argues with people who do know, brags about success when he's clearly exaggerating about it or lying and does so, while calling everyone an idiot.

In 10 years in this space I have not seen a change in the style or "personality" of the content that you are presenting here.

It looks as if it was shot about 1989 or so ...

Capturing the "personality" on film is an art form that your content lacks again and again.

It's more like preaching than teaching.

That time bubble hasn't changed for decades.

We wouldn't of shot exclusive solo girl for $1,000 when we had a market paying more. Woud you?
Damian face to face has always been respectful and nice to me.

****************************

Back to the thread for those who want to learn an alternative way.

So you have your unique twist on an idea or just a way you will style the content to suit your market. Now you need to find the performers. And I'm assuming here that you're not casting old times or people you have shot. Because unless a performer comes with a good CV and recommendations from people you trust, finding out they are crap on the day of the shoot is like burning your wallet.

Interviews are castings. A chance to find out what a model can do, what their personality is like and how they react to you and the work you need from them. Also you establish yourself as a professional in front of models.

So it's good to think about yourself and how you come across, having some real equipment around you says a lot. Even more important is the interviewer sets the pace at their terms. This will be old hat to anyone with professional interviewing techniques, for the rest here goes.

First set out how you will conduct the interview/casting, only needs to be done once or twice and essential that the shooter knows where he's going. Introductions, invite to sit down and where, puts the shooter in charge. Then tell them what's going to happen and what you're looking for and most importantly what's in it for them. Such as getting work and paid.

Obviously how an interview/casting for a newbie has to be conducted differently than for an experienced person or for one person different from a room full of people. And differently if you speak their language or not. Still it's important to set the agenda and not to allow the interviewee to set it.

More late.

Herb, go figure out why and come back and tell us. Before I tell people why it's best not to jump from style to style.

Also look at what consumers think of our dated style.

http://www.hardsextube.com/video/611503

http://xhamster.com/movies/265560/pa...threesome.html

Will post some samples of what I was shooting in 1989, so you can compare properly.

This movie has been removed due to complain from copyright owner.

xhamster one is gone

Hardsextube ones doesn't have comments and the numbers are not impressive
Uploaded by: martinifb Upload time: 2011-07-29 Duration: 29:59 Total views: 3003

Keep on preaching

Sorry to show you up. But can you tell us what's new about this porn. Beside being HD?

http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1067038

Because it's so dated it would be from 1999.

I sort of understand why Paul is so confused....

He posts his average boring sex scene which he did for $3000, he did not have any new idea, he did not waste any time with a look or fancy lighting and he buggered up the sound.

BUT isn't that what 99% of porn looks like?

The sex scenes of Max Candy's movie were just as lack luster, although they have discovered "the shot" which cinema discovered circa 1901.

Any kid with a camera could probably do better.

Most business people here don't want art, they want product, tons of it, like sausages.

Because to be creative is expensive and a risk and business does not like it, it wants another film like the one that made money last year.

So all hail Paul the hack, the sad thing is he is yesterdays hack.

No idea what you are referencing there since that is not my site, my program or anything to do with me or my business. I have no idea who these people are and being a one-man show here I cannot say they are even remotely associated with me.

Reading over the post you referenced I see you even blast it as well so I would assume that the content listed there is not your work either.

Not sure what you are "showing me up" on exactly there.

Still got a bee in your bonnet for me eh?

Anyway happy to announce IB won a public vote.



Best French Movie last year, yeah i know its not perfect, and hell i know i can still learn, but you know what - we made a pretty damn good movie in IB and many many people liked it.

Its now been broadcasted in most major markets - received well and its also made a hansom profit for the investors.

Even, better news than that - is i am at working on a even bigger project now.