Google Penalizing / Censoring Porn??? WTF???

[Naughty-Pages]

Go ahead disable "safe search" and Google some terms:
blowjob
foot fetish

etc... etc


most if not all results are non-porn right now.


Did some Bible Thumper do a hostile take-over of Google or some shit?? WTF?


if you do not add terms to your search phrase like porn and shit into your search you get youtube, cosmo, wikipedia, esquire, etc lol

[CPimp]

jesus loves me, this I know...

[AdultKing]

Blowjob

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellatio
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love...ive-a-blow-job
http://www.esquire.com/women/sex/ora...advice-6148501
http://www.tuckermax.com/stories/the-blowjob-follies/
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Blowjob
http://www.redbookmag.com/love-sex/a.../oral-sex-tips
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...nd+Blowjob+Day
http://www.ivillage.co.uk/10-steps-blowjob-bliss/122984
https://youtube.com/watch?v=0hm7pp_JFOs
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/3a8...-date-blow-job

Foot Fetish

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism
http://www.footfetish.com/
http://www.yourtango.com/200939762/h...oves-your-feet
http://www.tnaflix.com/feet-porn
http://www.footfetishtube.com/
http://www.footjobtube4free.com/
http://www.nerve.com/love-sex/i-did-...ce-foot-fetish
http://www.redtube.com/5435
http://www.footfetishdaily.com/
http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/40-famous-foot-fetishists


Plenty of porn and relevant results here in the standard results, turning off safesearch gives me more.

[papill0n]

yeah didnt you hear

google is removing everything from its index next week

not much time to panic so be quick!

[BSleazy]

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

Go ahead disable "safe search" and Google some terms:
blowjob
foot fetish

etc... etc


most if not all results are non-porn right now.


Did some Bible Thumper do a hostile take-over of Google or some shit?? WTF?


if you do not add terms to your search phrase like porn and shit into your search you get youtube, cosmo, wikipedia, esquire, etc lol

Your examples aren't really porn search terms...

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

turning off safesearch gives me more.

I have safe search turned off..

in my results, no porn for a search for "blowjob" until the last item on page 4

and for foot fetish only 2 sites are porn related on page 1.

(You're in Australia, try it with Google.com .... I just checked and there is a big difference in results)

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by BCyber

Your examples aren't really porn search terms...

that may be.. but before this last update if safe search was turned off, searching for those terms would have resulted in 90% porn sites on page 1...

the results that are there now is what it looked like a week ago with safe search turned on.

[papill0n]

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

that may be.. but before this last update if safe search was turned off, searching for those terms would have resulted in 90% porn sites on page 1...

the results that are there now is what it looked like a week ago with safe search turned on.

blowjob gives me madthumbs,youporn redtube etc with safesearch on

[bronco67]

I put "rimjob cumsluts" into Google, and all I got was a video of Martha Stewart making Tuna Casserole.

[AdultKing]

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

You're in Australia, try it with Google.com

Blowjob

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellatio
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love...ive-a-blow-job
https://youtube.com/watch?v=0hm7pp_JFOs
http://www.esquire.com/women/sex/ora...advice-6148501
http://www.tuckermax.com/stories/the-blowjob-follies/
http://www.redbookmag.com/love-sex/a.../oral-sex-tips
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...nd+Blowjob+Day
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0130515/
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Blowjob
http://cocktails.about.com/od/cockta...w_job_shtr.htm

Foot Fetish

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism
http://www.yourtango.com/200939762/h...oves-your-feet
http://www.footfetish.com/
http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/40-famous-foot-fetishists
http://www.nerve.com/love-sex/i-did-...ce-foot-fetish
http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/tmzs...fetish_contest
http://www.askmen.com/dating/dzimmer...e_answers.html
http://twitter.com/#!/lyricz_089
http://deadspin.com/5715741/this-may...+fetish-videos
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tLMfHUamxjU


However

Blowjobs

http://xhamster.com/channels/new-blowjobs-1.html
http://www.freeblowjobhdtube.com/
http://www.blowjobvision.com/
http://www.bangyoulater.com/video/blowjob/
http://www.blowjobs.com/
http://www.pornhub.com/video/search?search=blowjobs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellatio
http://www.redtube.com/9308
http://www.youngleafs.com/pictures/blowjob.shtml
http://www.xvideos.com/tags/blowjobs

and

free porn

http://www.pornhub.com/
http://www.perfectgirls.net/
http://www.pinkworld.com/
http://www.xnxx.com/
http://www.redtube.com/
http://www.youporn.com/
http://www.spankwire.com/
http://www.keezmovies.com/
http://www.elephanttube.com/
http://www.tube8.com/


No shortage of porn in the US either

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by papill0n

blowjob gives me madthumbs,youporn redtube etc with safesearch on

are you using Google.com ? or Google for a different country?

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by bronco67

I put "rimjob cumsluts" into Google, and all I got was a video of Martha Stewart making Tuna Casserole.

lmfao ;)

[d-null]

lol, you are right


and for those not seeing it, make sure you sign out of google account first, then do the search

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

No shortage of porn in the US either

Just saying, it was not that way a week ago with safe search off..

free porn and most anything with porn in the phrase is fine. but before with safe search off, blowjob or foot fetish etc etc would return mostly porn sites.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

lmfao ;)

It's not funny. Pretty soon we'll all have to jerk off while holding a magazine -- as opposed to clicking a mouse like god intended.

[AdultKing]

Google isn't censoring porn, all those results are pretty much what you'd expect.

Turning safesearch off doesn't mean you're going to instantly get more porn for any given result, it just means that some sites may appear more frequently.

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

Turning safesearch off doesn't mean you're going to instantly get more porn for any given result, it just means that some sites may appear more frequently.

You are toally missing my point:

LAST WEEK with safe search off, the results WERE 90% porn..

I am commenting on the difference.. the change.. since last week

Originally Posted by bronco67

It's not funny. Pretty soon we'll all have to jerk off while holding a magazine -- as opposed to clicking a mouse like god intended.

whacking it "old school"....... shit. i am not sure if i remember how to do that anymore.. lol

[AdultKing]

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

You are toally missing my point:

LAST WEEK with safe search off, the results WERE 90% porn..

I am commenting on the difference.. the change.. since last week

I understand your point, I'm just saying that I don't think Google is censoring or penalizing porn. The results you got last week were probably sites which have been adjusted in the latest update.

I could see a complaint if for those keywords there weren't relevant results but the results look pretty relevant to me.

[BIGTYMER]

Let's sue!!

[jimmycooper]

Originally Posted by bronco67

I put "rimjob cumsluts" into Google, and all I got was a video of Martha Stewart making Tuna Casserole.

Same here, but I made that casserole for dinner last night and it was fucking awesome so I can't complain.

[ContentPimp]

matt cutts is anti porn, (publicly) but i bet he's a huge porn connaisseur in secret lol

[2intense]

a bunch of idiots working for big G

[acrylix]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

I understand your point, I'm just saying that I don't think Google is censoring or penalizing porn. The results you got last week were probably sites which have been adjusted in the latest update.

Totally agree that Google is not censoring porn. Their results have simply gone to shit since Penguin waddled into town.

Sites are still bouncing around all over the place though, so we'll have to wait and see what happens. Been finding myself resorting to Bing for more searches this week actually.

[Denny]

Old news.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1059575

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by Denny

Old news.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1059575

I missed that post...

Not that I am much of a conspiracy theorist, but instead of bible thumper issues, it is now making me think they did this on purpose to generate more traffic to non porn sites.... thinking that a larger percentage of non porn sites use Adwords/Adsense and as a result it will drive up their profits. (As they gain no revenue from porn for the most part).

I can understand trying to limit accidental exposure, but this seems a little overboard.

It does make me think alot of people searching for porn may switch to Bing though.. And hell, if they like it, they may just switch permanently...

[$5 submissions]

Originally Posted by BCyber

Your examples aren't really porn search terms...

Exactly.

[AdultKing]

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

It does make me think alot of people searching for porn may switch to Bing though.. And hell, if they like it, they may just switch permanently...

That's just wishful thinking.

[TheDA]

No difference for me. Lots of porn on my regular porn terms.

[Klen]

Actually one of reasons why this happen was case with site anal santorum which outranked official site of rick santorum,so that is why google changed algorithm to give advantage to "official pages" against porn pages.

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

Exactly.

Again.. missing the point about the change

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

It does make me think alot of people searching for porn may switch to Bing though.. And hell, if they like it, they may just switch permanently...

Originally Posted by AdultKing

That's just wishful thinking.

Hey.. a boy can dream... can't he? lol

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

Actually one of reasons why this happen was case with site anal santorum which outranked official site of rick santorum,so that is why google changed algorithm to give advantage to "official pages" against porn pages.

I never liked that guy.. he always seemed super creepy to me.. he gives me the heebie-jeebies.. like he probably has gay sex while wearing a diaper and high heels tapping his feet in a men's bathroom stall, but then is all righteous on the side.. Anywhoo.. I read this article and this excerpt is troubling:

Postscript 4 (March 5): Google confirmed for me that SafeSearch does downgrade adult content if not deemed relevant to the search.

The problem is, that update is affecting some relevant searches.. and for alot of obvious phrases, what comes up first and most is illegal porn tubes and illegal file sharing services.. this is not a good thing for the adult industry.

[Klen]

Well,i can only hope surfers which usually search on those terms will switch to bing/yahoo where i dominate ;)

[Sophie Delancey]

Originally Posted by bronco67

I put "rimjob cumsluts" into Google, and all I got was a video of Martha Stewart making Tuna Casserole.

I will admit... I lol'd.

[Tom_PM]

Here's all I know. If I want to see blowjob content and typing blowjob doesn't bring up results I want. Then I will just type blowjob porn, blowjob porno, blowjob movies, free blowjob porno movies.. and etcetera.

So while it may drop "blowjob" and show wikipedia and whatnot.. I dont see it as a real terrible problem. In fact, thats a terrible general term and for advertising it's better to make the query more focussed anyway.

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

Here's all I know. If I want to see blowjob content and typing blowjob doesn't bring up results I want. Then I will just type blowjob porn, blowjob porno, blowjob movies, free blowjob porno movies.. and etcetera.

So while it may drop "blowjob" and show wikipedia and whatnot.. I dont see it as a real terrible problem. In fact, thats a terrible general term and for advertising it's better to make the query more focussed anyway.

I will agree with that.. I mean I do see where traffic could be higher quality in the long run because it will weed out some traffic that would probably not have been productive. Just troublesome that the surfer has to take one more additional step they did not have to in the past. and honestly, people that pay for porn are not the sharpest pencils in the box with all of the piracy out there.

But it really does irk me that for most terms I punch in now, illegal tube sites and illegal file sharing sites rank even noticeably higher than they did before. (along with sites that have scraped my site titles) I suppose surfers would be happy to get exactly what they want.. porn they do not have to pay for.. whether it is illegal or not... we need something with the same level of clout and aggressiveness as the RIAA for porn. LOL

[AdultKing]

54.5% of user queries are greater than 3 words (source: Google)

So if you're targeting the keyword blowjob and not the hundreds of better long tail keywords relating to blowjobs then you're missing out terribly.

[mikesouth]

Got news for y'all google is now taking your search history into account when it offers results so different people will get different results, generally speaking.

[Klen]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

54.5% of user queries are greater than 3 words (source: Google)

So if you're targeting the keyword blowjob and not the hundreds of better long tail keywords relating to blowjobs then you're missing out terribly.

Yep i would dare to say those who lost traffic from keyword like "pussy" gained it on other keywords so in the end they got more traffic.Too bad i am not among those

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by bronco67

I put "rimjob cumsluts" into Google, and all I got was a video of Martha Stewart making Tuna Casserole.

[Axzar]

http://www.google.com/ncr No Country Redirect FYI

[Deej]

Been like this for what... a year or so now?

[ruff]

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Got news for y'all google is now taking your search history into account when it offers results so different people will get different results, generally speaking.

Those bastards. Why I never...

[Captain Kawaii]

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Got news for y'all google is now taking your search history into account when it offers results so different people will get different results, generally speaking.

You can clear it in the tools section...Thing that sucks about google on this is they turn it back on after your search...you have to go back again and again...thats why I'm using BING and Yahoo more and more...

[Naughty-Pages]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

54.5% of user queries are greater than 3 words (source: Google)

So if you're targeting the keyword blowjob and not the hundreds of better long tail keywords relating to blowjobs then you're missing out terribly.

Ya, i never target 1 word keywords, usually at least 3 is what i focus on, sometime more which is probably too narrow lmao.. i was just making an observation about the results though...

I used to rank #1 for the past 3-4 years for a 3 word search and it brought in a ton of traffic.. and now my site is buried below illegal tubes, so I started just doing some random searches for different niches and was surprised with the overall Google results (or should i say, lack there of)

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Got news for y'all google is now taking your search history into account when it offers results so different people will get different results, generally speaking.

ya, i had noticed that.. when i would go back to google and start a new search, it has old search terms within the url including the new search terms.. (along with a ton of other data i.e. browser info, etc..)

[faxxaff]

Google has devalued sites containing affiliate links. That's the reason why 'porn sites' rank poorly these days.

[mromro]

So. they want site with no links out?

[Diomed]

That is fucking BRUTAL.

As most of regular google users aren't going to turn SafeSearch off.

Yeesh.