Google's update, Galleries, and rel="nofollow"??

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Naughty-Pages
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2006
    • 4533
    #1

    Google's update, Galleries, and rel="nofollow"??

    Do you think that if you have a ton of galleries linked with rel="nofollow" that Google's latest updates now treat your whole gallery pages as one big pile of advertisements??

    Just curious to hear from others who have a bunch of sites and use rel="nofollow" for fhg's on some sites and then do not use it on others.



    The other messed up thing is on some sites I was ranked #1 for, I am now on page 5, and 90% of what is above me is illegal tubes with pirated content.. and Also Scraped content..

    Some asshat stole a bunch of the titles verbatim including the name of my domain names from my sites and put it on pages of his own sites, and now outranks my own sites.. lmfao!
    Last edited by Naughty-Pages; 04-28-2012, 02:57 PM.
    Tags: None
    • sandman!
      Icq: 14420613
      • Mar 2001
      • 15431
      #2
      i always thought of no follow as something google can track to see who is spending more time on seo then building quality sites
      Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

        Comment

        • Naughty-Pages
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2006
          • 4533
          #3
          Originally posted by sandman!
          i always thought of no follow as something google can track to see who is spending more time on seo then building quality sites
          Ya.. that was sort of what I was thinking

          part of their over-optimization algo (combined with looking like one big advertisement)
          Last edited by Naughty-Pages; 04-28-2012, 03:05 PM.

            Comment

            • u-Bob
              there's no $$$ in porn
              • Jul 2005
              • 33063
              #4
              Originally posted by sandman!
              i always thought of no follow as something google can track to see who is spending more time on seo then building quality sites
              Exactly. There's no reason to use "no follow" in places other than user submitted comment areas. I always laughed when peopled used "no follow" to 'sculpt' their internal link structure.

                Comment

                • baryl
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 1086
                  #5
                  Well if your site is full of nothing but links to sponsor galleries then it is a page full of ads.

                    Comment

                    • RyuLion
                      ClubDomCash.com
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 32369
                      #6
                      Originally posted by baryl
                      Well if your site is full of nothing but links to sponsor galleries then it is a page full of ads.

                      Adult Biz Consultant A tech head since 1995
                      Affiliate Support: Chaturbate | CCBill Live

                        Comment

                        • VenusBlogger
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Nov 2011
                          • 1540
                          #7
                          nofollow never made sense...

                          it's a waste of time and it will only hurt your site to give it a NO NATURAL look...

                            Comment

                            • stevemib
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2012
                              • 68
                              #8
                              From what I have read is Google looks at everything above the fold. If there are too many ads and little content then it will hurt rankings. They have a full tutorial on google webmaster about the new Panda update.

                                Comment

                                • PXN
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jun 2008
                                  • 1548
                                  #9
                                  Don't think it make that much of a difference. But if you have too many like using it for links for hundreds of galleries it can make your whole webpage look long and bulky to google.

                                    Comment

                                    • baryl
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2011
                                      • 1086
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by VenusBlogger
                                      nofollow never made sense...

                                      it's a waste of time and it will only hurt your site to give it a NO NATURAL look...
                                      What is a "natural" look? Slopped together and unprofessional?

                                      I don't think nofollow in itself is bad but abusing it, especially on internal links, is bad. If a site is nothing but ads or gallery links it's going to get punished with out without nofollow.

                                        Comment

                                        Previous template Next
                                        Working...