How Many People Here Think Obama Will Take It In The ASS This November? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

ruff · 04-22-2012, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor

Boehner has put forth a budget every year. The majority democrats, who are required by law to do so, haven't. That's why deductions were different the first half of 2010 than the last half, because they've yet to manage an annual budget. They CHOSE not to pass a budget when they controlled both houses because that would mean writing down in black and white just how basly they were fucking up. Look, you can be a huge fan of Kennedy or even Clinton and that makes some kind of sense, just as most people really liked Reagan. But to say that Bush II or especially Obama weren't failures is simply denying the obvious reality.

Are you serious? You just posted a load of shit. I sure as hell thought you were smarter than this. I also thought some of the other posters were smart. You dumb shits want to lay all this crap at Obama's feet? Are you fucking serious?

Shut the fuck up!

04-22-2012, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArcherJanvier

I have done my share of fucking in my life, but I have never fucked an entire country.

Obama is one asshole that deserves to be fucked.

Archer

I agree and my ass is raw from this shit!

04-22-2012, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David!

Technically you are 40% right. Obama had full control over the Senate and Congress for 2 years. If he wanted, he could have had the Democrats vote a law that made Mickey Mouse Day a national holiday and there was nothing the Republicans could have done beside scream about it. He did use it to pass the healthcare law which made the Republicans apoplectic.

Amen to that shizzle!

epitome · 04-22-2012, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor

Yes, six months before running he said it woulda be "irresponsible" for him to run because "I believe in knowing what you'rw doing when you apply for a job." Remember he had been in Washington as a senator for several WEEKS when he launched his presidential campaign.

Where "this and that" means the entirety of the federal government. If you can't lead nectar a few members of your own party disagree with a few things, you can't lead. It's time for someone who can lead.

Reagan and Clinton both had a congress controlled by the opposite party and they managed to lead. If Obama can't even lead his own party (and he's utterly failed to do so) he's not presidential material, period.

Obama launched his presidential campaign in January, 2005?

04-22-2012, 04:18 PM

actually I would rather it lies where it really belongs, on Jimmy Carter and Eisenhower!

04-22-2012, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

Obama launched his presidential campaign in January, 2005?

Good Point, Sir!

ruff · 04-22-2012, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VanDahl

actually I would rather it lies where it really belongs, on Jimmy Carter and Eisenhower!

Shut the fuck up asshole.

Nookster · 04-22-2012, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB

You lose either way.

This, by fact, is the smartest post on gfy I've seen in months.

porno jew · 04-22-2012, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

i believe they were excited at the chance to 'bag a few a-rabs'.. a sentence i have heard more than once.

that sums up so many american voters in a nutshell: obama is probably the only one who can clean up the mess bush created, but i want to vote republican anyway.

some american's are propagandized and brainwashed approaching soviet or n korea levels, and the odd thing is they are propagandizing themselves voluntarily. it's amazing.

Bill8 · 04-22-2012, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

As an Independent, I have to say..

If the Republican party could just simply produce someone worthy of a vote it would probably be helpful.. but odds are Obama will see a 2nd term.. which hopefully might give him enough time to clean up the mess Bush got us into.

I find it funny how Republicans just put their head in a hole for 8 years of Bush running the country into the mess it is now, but the moment a Democrat jumps in, they just cannot keep their mouths shut about every little issue. most of which is not even within the Presidents control..

I'd vote for a Republican, but at least give us something to work with here.. my God..

quoted for the accurate description of our situation.

especially the description of whiny ass dickless republicans who sucked bush dick and cry like girls when obama does exactly the same thing.

Alex69 · 04-22-2012, 05:32 PM

he is useless....

Helix · 04-22-2012, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex69

he is useless....

qft.....

directfiesta · 04-22-2012, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor

The Democrats have controlled the House, the Senate, and the presidency for most of Obamas term. Republicans took the House (only) January last year. Democrats had absolute full control for two years. How has that worked? Unemployment DOUBLED, that's how. I was Tim Tebow fan. I WANTED him to do well. He failed. I can admit it. Even if you agree with Obama on key issues, you have to see that he was, in his own words, completely unqualified, and he's been a complete and utter failure.

seems they did submit budgets , maybe except 2011 :

http://budget.house.gov/BudgetAnalys...ratsBudget.htm

Now, that is the webpage of Paul Ryan, a repub ....

directfiesta · 04-22-2012, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

seems they did submit budgets , maybe except 2011 :

http://budget.house.gov/BudgetAnalys...ratsBudget.htm

Now, that is the webpage of Paul Ryan, a repub ....

seem,s 2011 as well :
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/12/17-2

but handed it over to the GOP .

Anyway, whatever the point is , it is Obama,s fault ....

Mrwww · 04-22-2012, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

great post. brilliant. permission to get it tattooed on my chest?

Sabby · 04-22-2012, 08:44 PM

Next to Mr President Clinton... I think Mr president Obama is the sexiest president ever..... I would vote for him if I was an American. Oh ya JFK was sexy too but dead before i was born.

Shotsie · 04-23-2012, 05:54 AM

CHICAGO?After coming to terms with the limited scope of what he can realistically expect to accomplish as president, Barack Obama announced Wednesday a new, more practical campaign slogan that will serve as the cornerstone for his 2012 reelection bid: "I Have Big Ideas But We'll See How It Goes."

"My fellow citizens, I stand here today to tell you that, if given a second term, I have very big plans for our nation's future," Obama said during a rally at Chicago's Navy Pier. "Ambitious, forward-thinking plans I will have to drastically scale down based on opinion polls, budget considerations, and political roadblocks, but, you know, I'll see what I can do. No promises, though."

"More than likely I'll have to placate political rivals until my bold agenda is a shell of what it once was." Obama added. "And that's what the 'We'll See' campaign is all about. Now let us go boldly forth and compromise our ideals."

Saying he intends to give certain initiatives a shot but that it's not looking very good, Obama cited lasting bipartisanship cooperation in Congress, birth-control coverage for all women, and an affordable college education for every citizen as concrete examples of ridiculous ideas that Americans need to put out of their minds, because, according to the president, "We're not living in a fantasyland here."

Instead, Obama said he hopes to rally voters behind causes like holding teachers accountable for student performances "while remembering tenure provisions that protect terrible educators from getting fired," imposing a surtax on millionaires "unless of course Republicans fight me really hard, which, in that case, what are you going to do," and an economic stimulus bill to fund new infrastructure that "doesn't have a chance in hell of passing but sure would be nice."

"Think of the America within our reach: a nation of entrepreneurs and innovators and dreamers capable of making big plans that will eventually be crushed by acrimonious gridlock," Obama said to smattering applause. "That's the future I see for America, because, let's be honest, that's just how it's always going to be."

"Then again, you never know," Obama continued, "If 50 or 60 key people die, there's a chance some of my policy ideas might at least make it past various Senate and House committees. Fingers crossed."

Many pundits have already condemned the new slogan, saying that while its language may capture the spirit of the political moment, its rhetoric is too optimistic.

"On the one hand, the slogan works because it avoids using overly presumptive words like 'win,' 'tomorrow,' 'future,' or 'better,'" Politico's chief White House correspondent Mike Allen said. "But using a phrase like 'We'll See' is also misleading, because it implies there is a slight possibility that something could happen. Unfortunately, voters need to realize that, at this point, nothing they could ever envision for the future?and I seriously mean nothing?has any chance of ever becoming a reality.

Vendzilla · 04-23-2012, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shotsie

CHICAGO?After coming to terms with the limited scope of what he can realistically expect to accomplish as president, Barack Obama announced Wednesday a new, more practical campaign slogan that will serve as the cornerstone for his 2012 reelection bid: "I Have Big Ideas But We'll See How It Goes."

"My fellow citizens, I stand here today to tell you that, if given a second term, I have very big plans for our nation's future," Obama said during a rally at Chicago's Navy Pier. "Ambitious, forward-thinking plans I will have to drastically scale down based on opinion polls, budget considerations, and political roadblocks, but, you know, I'll see what I can do. No promises, though."

"More than likely I'll have to placate political rivals until my bold agenda is a shell of what it once was." Obama added. "And that's what the 'We'll See' campaign is all about. Now let us go boldly forth and compromise our ideals."

Saying he intends to give certain initiatives a shot but that it's not looking very good, Obama cited lasting bipartisanship cooperation in Congress, birth-control coverage for all women, and an affordable college education for every citizen as concrete examples of ridiculous ideas that Americans need to put out of their minds, because, according to the president, "We're not living in a fantasyland here."

Instead, Obama said he hopes to rally voters behind causes like holding teachers accountable for student performances "while remembering tenure provisions that protect terrible educators from getting fired," imposing a surtax on millionaires "unless of course Republicans fight me really hard, which, in that case, what are you going to do," and an economic stimulus bill to fund new infrastructure that "doesn't have a chance in hell of passing but sure would be nice."

"Think of the America within our reach: a nation of entrepreneurs and innovators and dreamers capable of making big plans that will eventually be crushed by acrimonious gridlock," Obama said to smattering applause. "That's the future I see for America, because, let's be honest, that's just how it's always going to be."

"Then again, you never know," Obama continued, "If 50 or 60 key people die, there's a chance some of my policy ideas might at least make it past various Senate and House committees. Fingers crossed."

Many pundits have already condemned the new slogan, saying that while its language may capture the spirit of the political moment, its rhetoric is too optimistic.

"On the one hand, the slogan works because it avoids using overly presumptive words like 'win,' 'tomorrow,' 'future,' or 'better,'" Politico's chief White House correspondent Mike Allen said. "But using a phrase like 'We'll See' is also misleading, because it implies there is a slight possibility that something could happen. Unfortunately, voters need to realize that, at this point, nothing they could ever envision for the future?and I seriously mean nothing?has any chance of ever becoming a reality.

So what you're saying is at the end of his term he's blaming others for his failures?

David! · 04-23-2012, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young

You're from Canada. So me saying "you don't know shit" isn't too far fetched. Thank God you don't have a say in who the next President is going to be.

Actually, I'm from Florida, only been in Canada for 2 months so don't thank God too quick

raymor · 04-23-2012, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

seems they did submit budgets , maybe except 2011 :

http://budget.house.gov/BudgetAnalys...ratsBudget.htm

Now, that is the webpage of Paul Ryan, a repub ....

Congresses is supposed to PASS a budget. When the democrats had complete control, the house PROPOSED a budget, but they never PASSED anything. They controlled the house, senate, and presidency so they could have passed anything they wanted. They doesn't pass a budget, though did they?

I really don't understand the refusal to admit when your "team" is 0-14. I liked governor Bush. I wanted him to do well as president Bush. He didn't. I can admit that. Unemployment averaged around 5.5% during the Bush years and conservatives can say that's not great. Three years later, why can't liberals admit that 8.5% is a problem?

directfiesta · 04-23-2012, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor

Congresses is supposed to PASS a budget. When the democrats had complete control, the house PROPOSED a budget, but they never PASSED anything. They controlled the house, senate, and presidency so they could have passed anything they wanted. They doesn't pass a budget, though did they?

I really don't understand the refusal to admit when your "team" is 0-14. I liked governor Bush. I wanted him to do well as president Bush. He didn't. I can admit that. Unemployment averaged around 5.5% during the Bush years and conservatives can say that's not great. Three years later, why can't liberals admit that 8.5% is a problem?

I have NO team ... That is the problem with the USA ... like a basketball game ...

It has been clearly stated that the first objective of the GOP was to have Obama fail, even if that meant hurting the country ...
' The party before the country ' ..

I myself have not voted once for the same party in the last 3 federal elections we had ... I do not vote to ' win ' , I vote for what I think is best for me & the country ...

Naughty-Pages · 04-23-2012, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor

I liked governor Bush. I wanted him to do well as president Bush. He didn't. I can admit that. Unemployment averaged around 5.5% during the Bush years and conservatives can say that's not great. Three years later, why can't liberals admit that 8.5% is a problem?

The unemployment rate when Bush left office and Obama was inaugurated was 7.8% and was in the middle of one of the most rapids climbs in history, peaking around to 10% within a years time. I'd think most would agree that the first year of someones presidency, there is no possible way to make "immediate" changes, you have to deal with what you are dealt.

The damage was already done, and correcting the runaway train that was handed over is obviously not an overnight job.

It's like me hitting my ex-wife in the repeatedly in the face with a shovel. Then telling her new husband that it's his fault she looks ugly now.. and finally blaming him for her recovery taking so long because it only took a few moments to fuck up her face so the fix should be just as quick... lol

2012 · 04-23-2012, 03:10 PM

don't forget. your vote will make the difference !

Brujah · 04-23-2012, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

The unemployment rate when Bush left office and Obama was inaugurated was 7.8% and was in the middle of one of the most rapids climbs in history, peaking around to 10% within a years time. I'd think most would agree that the first year of someones presidency, there is no possible way to make "immediate" changes, you have to deal with what you are dealt.

The damage was already done, and correcting the runaway train that was handed over is obviously not an overnight job.

It's like me hitting my ex-wife in the repeatedly in the face with a shovel. Then telling her new husband that it's his fault she looks ugly now.. and finally blaming him for her recovery taking so long because it only took a few moments to fuck up her face so the fix should be just as quick... lol

No let's hold them to that. When a Republican candidate becomes our next President, let's remind them what they were saying when the new President is unable to fix everything the first year or two. Let's hold them to all the percentages they inherit the first month or two.

videoscribe · 04-23-2012, 03:27 PM

Obama seems like a man that knows how to give a good speech. He has no accent and he has no speech impediment. He reacts to his audience well. He mentions friends and work histories in his speeches. He talks about how to get more jobs and decrease unemployment. He talks about making health care more affordable. He talks about making healthcare maybe more similar to Canadian system. He talks about importance of energy for North American homes. Everything sounds good. Probably these speeches benefit the rich more than the poor. A lot of the system really is about who has the money.

Young · 04-23-2012, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

So what you're saying is at the end of his term he's blaming others for his failures?

You can't tell satire?

2MuchMark · 04-23-2012, 05:08 PM

It's common knowledge that Boener and the rest of the republicans #1 priority is to get Obama out, so they will do anything to accomplish this no matter what damage it causes. They have also learned that lying and flip-flopping works.

I hope Obama wins in November but considering how puppet Romney is doing I think Obama and dems have alot of work to do. It will be a close race.

directfiesta · 04-23-2012, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young

You can't tell satire?

Vendzilla pretty much stays at one dimension level ... don`t expect too much

Bill8 · 04-23-2012, 07:32 PM

since obama keeps fucking his base up the ass, and appealing to the right and center, it will be his own fault if he loses.

I wont vote for that fucking uncle tom. fuck him and the corporations whose dicks he constantly sucks.

all the republicans have to do is get out the vote, and not be such rabid religious moralistic anti-female old fartbags, and they have a chance, despite the polls that put that hahahahahaha 6 points ahead of white obama "Obamney".

on paper obama looks like a lock, but if all the people like me who hate his banker puppetmasters refuse to vote for him, you idiot republicans might win.

then what - ROFLMAO - look what you brought to the table. Fucking Obamney, the mormon obama.

Vendzilla · 04-24-2012, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young

You can't tell satire?

Can you? Or did I get it wrong? It's all over the news, Obama's game plan is to play the blame game. Damn near every speech I see him make he's blaming someone else. Last speech I heard he was blaming Bush.

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Vendzilla pretty much stays at one dimension level ... don`t expect too much

Good thing you don't vote here.

Vendzilla · 04-24-2012, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages

The unemployment rate when Bush left office and Obama was inaugurated was 7.8% and was in the middle of one of the most rapids climbs in history, peaking around to 10% within a years time. I'd think most would agree that the first year of someones presidency, there is no possible way to make "immediate" changes, you have to deal with what you are dealt.

The damage was already done, and correcting the runaway train that was handed over is obviously not an overnight job.

It's like me hitting my ex-wife in the repeatedly in the face with a shovel. Then telling her new husband that it's his fault she looks ugly now.. and finally blaming him for her recovery taking so long because it only took a few moments to fuck up her face so the fix should be just as quick... lol

If Obama hadn't tied up the house and the senate for a year getting the health care law passed, which now may be thrown out. And focused on repairing the damage, maybe things would be better.
What's scary is the amount of cuts it's going to take to balance the budget.

BFT3K · 04-24-2012, 09:06 PM

Mmmmm sandwich....

04-22-2012, 08:44 PM	#66
Sabby Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 2,888	Next to Mr President Clinton... I think Mr president Obama is the sexiest president ever..... I would vote for him if I was an American. Oh ya JFK was sexy too but dead before i was born. Last edited by Sabby; 04-22-2012 at 08:48 PM..

04-23-2012, 03:10 PM	#73
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	don't forget. your vote will make the difference ! __________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself

04-23-2012, 05:08 PM	#77
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 49,152	It's common knowledge that Boener and the rest of the republicans #1 priority is to get Obama out, so they will do anything to accomplish this no matter what damage it causes. They have also learned that lying and flip-flopping works. I hope Obama wins in November but considering how puppet Romney is doing I think Obama and dems have alot of work to do. It will be a close race. __________________ Custom Coding \| Videochat Solutions \| Age Verification \| IT Help & Support www.2Much.net

04-23-2012, 07:32 PM	#79
Bill8 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 1,901	since obama keeps fucking his base up the ass, and appealing to the right and center, it will be his own fault if he loses. I wont vote for that fucking uncle tom. fuck him and the corporations whose dicks he constantly sucks. all the republicans have to do is get out the vote, and not be such rabid religious moralistic anti-female old fartbags, and they have a chance, despite the polls that put that hahahahahaha 6 points ahead of white obama "Obamney". on paper obama looks like a lock, but if all the people like me who hate his banker puppetmasters refuse to vote for him, you idiot republicans might win. then what - ROFLMAO - look what you brought to the table. Fucking Obamney, the mormon obama. Last edited by Bill8; 04-23-2012 at 07:34 PM..

04-22-2012, 04:18 PM	#55
VanDahl Guest Posts: n/a	actually I would rather it lies where it really belongs, on Jimmy Carter and Eisenhower!

04-22-2012, 05:32 PM	#61
Alex69 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 328	he is useless....

04-23-2012, 05:54 AM	#67
Shotsie Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: 12th & Tree Posts: 1,208	CHICAGO?After coming to terms with the limited scope of what he can realistically expect to accomplish as president, Barack Obama announced Wednesday a new, more practical campaign slogan that will serve as the cornerstone for his 2012 reelection bid: "I Have Big Ideas But We'll See How It Goes." "My fellow citizens, I stand here today to tell you that, if given a second term, I have very big plans for our nation's future," Obama said during a rally at Chicago's Navy Pier. "Ambitious, forward-thinking plans I will have to drastically scale down based on opinion polls, budget considerations, and political roadblocks, but, you know, I'll see what I can do. No promises, though." "More than likely I'll have to placate political rivals until my bold agenda is a shell of what it once was." Obama added. "And that's what the 'We'll See' campaign is all about. Now let us go boldly forth and compromise our ideals." Saying he intends to give certain initiatives a shot but that it's not looking very good, Obama cited lasting bipartisanship cooperation in Congress, birth-control coverage for all women, and an affordable college education for every citizen as concrete examples of ridiculous ideas that Americans need to put out of their minds, because, according to the president, "We're not living in a fantasyland here." Instead, Obama said he hopes to rally voters behind causes like holding teachers accountable for student performances "while remembering tenure provisions that protect terrible educators from getting fired," imposing a surtax on millionaires "unless of course Republicans fight me really hard, which, in that case, what are you going to do," and an economic stimulus bill to fund new infrastructure that "doesn't have a chance in hell of passing but sure would be nice." "Think of the America within our reach: a nation of entrepreneurs and innovators and dreamers capable of making big plans that will eventually be crushed by acrimonious gridlock," Obama said to smattering applause. "That's the future I see for America, because, let's be honest, that's just how it's always going to be." "Then again, you never know," Obama continued, "If 50 or 60 key people die, there's a chance some of my policy ideas might at least make it past various Senate and House committees. Fingers crossed." Many pundits have already condemned the new slogan, saying that while its language may capture the spirit of the political moment, its rhetoric is too optimistic. "On the one hand, the slogan works because it avoids using overly presumptive words like 'win,' 'tomorrow,' 'future,' or 'better,'" Politico's chief White House correspondent Mike Allen said. "But using a phrase like 'We'll See' is also misleading, because it implies there is a slight possibility that something could happen. Unfortunately, voters need to realize that, at this point, nothing they could ever envision for the future?and I seriously mean nothing?has any chance of ever becoming a reality.

04-23-2012, 03:27 PM	#75
videoscribe Banned by fatfoo Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 362	Obama seems like a man that knows how to give a good speech. He has no accent and he has no speech impediment. He reacts to his audience well. He mentions friends and work histories in his speeches. He talks about how to get more jobs and decrease unemployment. He talks about making health care more affordable. He talks about making healthcare maybe more similar to Canadian system. He talks about importance of energy for North American homes. Everything sounds good. Probably these speeches benefit the rich more than the poor. A lot of the system really is about who has the money.

04-24-2012, 09:06 PM	#82
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	Mmmmm sandwich....