![]() |
Quote:
|
Dont you guys dare tell me that you have never put peanut butter on your sack and let your dog lick it off?!?!!?
or put milk on your cock and let the cat lick it off? am I the only one?!?!?! FUCK! how embarassing |
Quote:
You're joking I hope . . . |
Quote:
DUH thats not penetration is perfectly legal.. |
Quote:
However again it falls subect to something called the 'Miller Test' which, it is my understanding that it is virtually impossible to get anything of a sexual nature past due to the afforementioned cruetly to animals and/or humane treatment laws each state has. Thats *MY* understanding of the U.S laws pertaining to it anyway. Regards, Lee |
Whoops, should have mentioned...
The Miller Test is carried out by Federal agencies and therefore THAT is how it becomes a federal matter :) Regards, Lee |
Quote:
The "Miller Test" has to do specifically with "Community Standards" correct? |
Quote:
As far as i am aware the Miller Test was defined by the US Supreme Court in circa 1970 ish lol and yes, its kinda the same as the community standards stuff, im just looking for a bookmark as i type so excuse the waffling on here...... Got it : http://www.nationallawcenter.org/Miller%20Test.htm Regards, Lee |
Lee--
Do you have any reservations about the use of the Miller test to prosecute bestaility? |
The Miller test is for ANY obscene material.
Lee is talking out of her ass. Beast, scat, bondage, fisting, gay hardcore... its all the same in the eyes of those who want to call it "obscene". Fucking armchair lawyers. |
Quote:
This guarantee you offer in your sig... Does this mean I'll get paid for every 25 surfers I send no matter what? |
Quote:
A: The laws in the US that make beastiality illegal are against the act itself, not posessing, selling or promoting beast pics. They do not exist in every state, only.. a rough approximation.. 3/5 of them. B. The Miller Test is conducted by a jury. It has nothing to do with "federal agencies", except maybe for the federal agency.. the US Supreme Court.. that implemented it. C. It is not at all clear that all beast content would fail the Miller test in front of a jury. Double fisting is now considered unprosecutable in S. California. Do you think the same people would judge a labrador licking peanut butter off some chick obscene? Maybe, maybe not. Personally I wouldn't take the chance with owning beast sites in the US, but the risk for someone who wants to promote it is far from what you are trying to make it out to be. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123