Porn isn't copy-write protected? Lawsuit says so...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • PornHustler
    Confirmed User
    • May 2009
    • 456
    #1

    Porn isn't copy-write protected? Lawsuit says so...

    Looks like she was downloading porn torrent style and it caught up with here and now she is suing the production company.

    The woman, Liuxia Wong of Solano, sued first, hitting a studio called Hard Drive Productions on Monday with the argument that its demand for a $3,400 settlement was unconstitutional because porn is obscenity, and obscenity isn't protected by the Copyright Clause of the Constitution.
    http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...copyright-porn
    Contact ICQ: 570768377
    Sub 1:440 Blog Converting Sponsor
    Tags: None
    • JFK
      FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
      • Jan 2002
      • 67373
      #2
      it's copyright btw

      FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
      For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

        Comment

        • DWB
          Registered User
          • Jul 2003
          • 31779
          #3
          Hahahahahahaha!

          Porn is not obscenity. Obscenity has no definition yet. But the judges know it when they see it. ;-)

          What a stupid whore.

            Comment

            • EddyTheDog
              Just Doing My Own Thing
              • Jan 2011
              • 25433
              #4
              Where would that leave us?

              It wont happen, but how would we cope if it did?

                Comment

                • GregE
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 2704
                  #5
                  Originally posted by PornHustler
                  Looks like she was downloading porn torrent style and it caught up with here and now she is suing the production company.

                  http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...copyright-porn
                  Too bad she doesn't live somewhere like Polk County, FL.

                  By asserting that what she knowingly downloaded (what she believes to be) obscene material she has, in effect, admitted to the sort of criminal act that redneck sheriff's love to make a big fuss about.

                  50/50 lifetime payout - EXCLUSIVE CONTENT - CCBill
                  CLiCK here for your Bun Beating Dollars.

                    Comment

                    • NaughtyRob
                      Two fresh affiliate progs
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 29602
                      #6
                      What he said.

                      Originally posted by DWB
                      Hahahahahahaha!

                      Porn is not obscenity. Obscenity has no definition yet. But the judges know it when they see it. ;-)

                      What a stupid whore.
                      [email protected]
                      Skype: 17026955414
                      Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

                        Comment

                        • Captain Kawaii
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Oct 2007
                          • 6748
                          #7
                          Originally posted by GregE
                          Too bad she doesn't live somewhere like Polk County, FL.

                          By asserting that what she knowingly downloaded (what she believes to be) obscene material she has, in effect, admitted to the sort of criminal act that redneck sheriff's love to make a big fuss about.
                          What a stupid bitch...Too bad she doesn't live in South Carolina either.
                          Wong Can't make a Wight in this case.

                            Comment

                            • grumpy
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jan 2002
                              • 9870
                              #8
                              Stupid yes, but what if, what if she get a very catholic judge??
                              Don't let greediness blur your vision | You gotta let some shit slide
                              icq - 441-456-888

                                Comment

                                • blackmonsters
                                  Making PHP work
                                  • Nov 2002
                                  • 20984
                                  #9
                                  Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
                                  obscene material.
                                  Your neighbor will murder you with frogs
                                  Click here

                                    Comment

                                    • L-Pink
                                      working on my tan
                                      • Mar 2005
                                      • 39151
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by blackmonsters
                                      Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
                                      obscene material.
                                      Good point!

                                      .

                                        Comment

                                        • FLFHoles
                                          Registered User
                                          • Feb 2010
                                          • 17
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by blackmonsters
                                          Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
                                          obscene material.
                                          It's not illegal to possess obscene material with the exception of CP or Bestiality only to disseminate obscene material. So if she was using torrents and was sending packets while she was receiving packets, then she would be guilty of obscenity distribution. I forget the exact case but I believe it was Georgia and maybe Sirkin who argued on the legality of being able to possess it legally but not being able to purchase it which creates a catch-22.

                                          Her strategy isn't that bad. If the courts can find the material obscene then the company cannot allege infringement because you cannot copyright obscenity. If it can be proven obscene, the DA won't give a shit about the downloaded because they will have a much bigger fish to fry with the pornographer.

                                            Comment

                                            • vsex
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Aug 2010
                                              • 1277
                                              #12
                                              Originally posted by FLFHoles
                                              It's not illegal to possess obscene material with the exception of CP or Bestiality only to disseminate obscene material. So if she was using torrents and was sending packets while she was receiving packets, then she would be guilty of obscenity distribution. I forget the exact case but I believe it was Georgia and maybe Sirkin who argued on the legality of being able to possess it legally but not being able to purchase it which creates a catch-22.

                                              Her strategy isn't that bad. If the courts can find the material obscene then the company cannot allege infringement because you cannot copyright obscenity. If it can be proven obscene, the DA won't give a shit about the downloaded because they will have a much bigger fish to fry with the pornographer.
                                              VSEX.COM
                                              AFFILIATES
                                              [email protected]
                                              New Model Signup

                                              Most realistic thing ever written on GFY:

                                              Shap: "Solidarity is nice in theory but this industry has proven time and time again it can not stand together. The best advice I can give you is to do what is best for you with both your short term and long term goals in mind."

                                                Comment

                                                • bronco67
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Dec 2006
                                                  • 29032
                                                  #13
                                                  I hope someone smashes her in the face with a shovel.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • FLFHoles
                                                      Registered User
                                                      • Feb 2010
                                                      • 17
                                                      #14
                                                      Originally posted by vsex
                                                      .....
                                                      Prove one thing I said that is incorrect. Just one. I'll wait........

                                                        Comment

                                                        Previous template Next
                                                        Working...