Looks Like Iran is ON:

[MediaGuy]

We don't get this type of news here dammit:

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/...th_of_Horm uz

While U.S. Preisdent Barack Obama?s supporters hailed his withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq as the end of the war in the middle east, behind the scenes the Pentagon has been quietly massing troops and armaments on two islands located just south of the Strait of Hormuz, and within easy striking distance of Iran, infowars.com reported.

In addition to some 50,000 U.S. troops currently in the region waiting for orders (apparently they won?t be home by this past Christmas as was originally promised), Obama is deploying an additional 50,000 soldiers to be ready for ?any contingency? by

Dagnabbit!

:D

[PR_Glen]

an armenian site who got it from infowars? classy.

[porno jew]

it's been "around the corner" for the last decade. don't be such a sheep.

[PenisFace]

The US can't afford to hit Iran with ground troops, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy. Unlike with Iraq, the Iranians aren't actually all that bad at fighting. Precision airstrikes from far away will knock out any key targets and that will be that.

[seeandsee]

they are taking country by country , so IRan will come one day to serve them

[CrocMint]

No wonder Armenia is worrying about this - they have common borders with Iran

[mizmiz]

Originally Posted by PenisFace

The US can't afford to hit Iran with ground troops, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy. Unlike with Iraq, the Iranians aren't actually all that bad at fighting. Precision airstrikes from far away will knock out any key targets and that will be that.

lol your so dumb.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by PenisFace

The US can't afford to hit Iran with ground troops, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy. Unlike with Iraq, the Iranians aren't actually all that bad at fighting. Precision airstrikes from far away will knock out any key targets and that will be that.

Let me see if I understand this correctly...

Iran and Iraq fought for ten years and no one won. The US bitch smacked Iraq in thirty days.

What in the world makes you think Iran can stand on it's own two legs, no less fight a war with the US? Iran can't even produce it's own fucking gas. It's military is in horrible shape, it has trouble keeping their planes flying, and it's Navy depends on the US to rescue it's own citizens. Did you notice how when the USS Abraham Lincoln entered the Strait of Hormuz - after being warned by Iran not to - that Iran shut it's mouth up quickly?

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by mizmiz

lol your so dumb.

lol... you are so ... zionist ..

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by MediaGuy

We don't get this type of news here dammit:

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/...th_of_Horm uz

Dagnabbit!

:D

It's called "pre-positioned".

The US has a policy of building up and pre-positioning gear in place in areas of potential conflict, and then just flying in troops and using gear already in place. It's a lot cheaper and a lot quicker than having to fly everything in.

There are entire bases that do this - like Diego Garcia.

At the same time, it's a lot cheaper to leave the gear behind too. Why move everything back to the United States when there is a good chance we'll need it there again.

[brassmonkey]

bring it on!

[BIGTYMER]

Glad I've been buying US defense stocks.

I'll be in bad shape if the warmachine ever stops.

[JFK]

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

Glad I've been buying US defense stocks.

I'll be in bad shape if the warmachine ever stops.

I was watching the history of the "Rothschilds" the other day, they would be in the same boat

[BFT3K]

The false flag "Iranian" terrorist attack on the US is coming!

Then they can rally the sheeple, to justify the next step on the "war on terror".



Bet on it!

[campimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The US bitch smacked Iraq in thirty days.

that sure was a long 30 days

[DBS.US]

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

Glad I've been buying US defense stocks.

I'll be in bad shape if the warmachine ever stops.

What's a good US defense stock to watch?

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by BFT3K

The false flag "Iranian" terrorist attack on the US is coming!

Then they can rally the sheeple, to justify the next step on the "war on terror".



Bet on it!

I love that graphic...

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by campimp

that sure was a long 30 days

The war was between the Iraqi government and it's military and the United States. Pretty much Iraq folded quickly.

[adendreams]

you guys think we would put boots into Iran? Not gunna happen. Ever

Some tactical strikes against their nuke sites, maybe..full scale invasion? not a chance

Unlike Iraq they are a serious country with a serious military - and the Iranian people would go apeshit - even the ones who hate their government. Iran would kick our ass if any US soldiers set foot in that place.

[dgraves]

occupying iran has always been part of the plan. they can't build a pipeline around it so they have to go through it.

the middle east conflict is about oil, not terrorism. we tried to claim iraq had weapons of mass destruction but when the UN couldn't find them, we had to figure out another threat, hence 9/11.

now that we have iraq pretty much buttoned up, it's time to make iran look like a threat so we can occupy in order to start pipeline construction. this has been the plan from the beginning.

[BIGTYMER]

Originally Posted by DBS.US

What's a good US defense stock to watch?

GD - General Dynamics
NOC - Northrop Grumman
HII - Huntington Ingalls (Just a few months ago NOC split up there ship building into HII. Made me a ton of money. If I recall correctly it was a 2:1 stock split.)
RTN - Raytheon
LMT - Lockheed Martin
TDY - Teledyne Technologies

Heavy hitters. In no real order.

[Dcat]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

an armenian site who got it from infowars? classy.

What's wrong with infowars.com?

You'll hear more truth there in a day than you'll find sifting through all the lame stream media horse shit in a year.

[moeloubani]

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

I dunno about that. Iran's population was 60 million when they fought a decade long war with Iraq (20 million) ending in a stalemate. We took Iraq in less then 100 days?

All I know is if I was Iran and saw how American troops slaughtered my enemy neighbor in a short period of time, I'd be nervous.

You can't define winning a war by the time it takes to occupy the area. You have to take into consideration how much easier it is to fight a guerilla style campaign against an organized military than it is to go head to head with them in open war.

Iraq was taken so quickly because the people that were fighting were patient and waited for the US to settle in. Now look at the situation in Iraq, at one time the top terrorist there Muqtada Al-Sadr is now a big part of their government, there is still ongoing violence and they are still extremely anti-American. They are worse than when the US went in.

[theking]

Originally Posted by campimp

that sure was a long 30 days

The military defeated their military...toppled Sadam and overthrew the Bathist Government in 24 days.

[moeloubani]

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

Well to define "winning" you also must share similar objectives. Before the US invaded, 10% of Iraqis oil was exported to the US, now 80%. The goal was not to simply overthrow the government, as this did happen, but to secure a source of oil to minimize others financial industrial growth by occupying energy. As this is also happened.

Fair enough but that took more than 100 days to accomplish.

[buzzard]

Iran is an issue every time we have a democratic president.
Go ahead and feel tough to other countries. They are made of human beings, just like you.
Once Ron Paul is elected, wars and Iran will disappear

[Dirty F]

Just what the world needs.

[Joshua G]

knock off pakistan, iran, syria & israel, there will be peace.

[LiveDose]

Originally Posted by mizmiz

lol your so dumb.

How ironic.

[BFT3K]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ybZ0d2WJw5Q

[Just Alex]

jews are going to be thrilled.

[DarkJedi]

A huge ass US Aegis Cruiser came to our seaport a few days ago (Black Sea). It's on board missiles can reach Iran from here.

But it's leaving tomorrow i think. (it's so cold here, it almost got frozen in place, rofl)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Vella_Gulf_%28CG-72%29

[potter]

WTF do you mean we won't get that kind of news here? This is already old news in the states.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/...9#.Tyq1mSPQ9ss

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/s...ait/52764150/1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...rMQ_story.html

http://www.denverpost.com/war/ci_19805176

^ All from a WEEK ago. You Canadians are slow at getting your news eh?

[porno jew]

it's in the best interest for all parties involved to beat the drums to keep oil prices high, among other things.

[brassmonkey]

im waiting

[potter]

Originally Posted by porno jew

it's in the best interest for all parties involved to beat the drums to keep oil prices high, among other things.

Actually it's to keep oil prices down. Iran threatened to take out transports through the straight of hormuz, so we and many other allies have sent ships and troops there. Man you conspiracy nuts are idiots.

Also, nothing will come of it. Just as Iran has done for the past thirty years - they beat their chest like a moronic 8 year old throwing a hissy fit. They won't actually do anything, however as oil is a big economic factor, we have to abide and show that we won't stand for it by sending ships/troops there for protection. We can't just let Iran bluff all the time.

Also for all you kiddies who seem to always think war is upon us, specially when it comes to Iran. This shit has been happening with Iran for literally thirty years. I know it's fun to think your time on this earth is special and something new is happening but it's not. This same thing happened last year, the year before that, and so on. And it will happen again next year and the year after that.

So calm down and shut the fuck up. Thank you.

[porno jew]

you missed my point.

Originally Posted by potter

Actually it's to keep oil prices down. Iran threatened to take out transports through the straight of hormuz, so we and many other allies have sent ships and troops there. Man you conspiracy nuts are idiots.

Also, nothing will come of it. Just as Iran has done for the past thirty years - they beat their chest like a moronic 8 year old throwing a hissy fit. They won't actually do anything, however as oil is a big economic factor, we have to abide and show that we won't stand for it by sending ships/troops there for protection. We can't just let Iran bluff all the time.

Also for all you kiddies who seem to always think war is upon us, specially when it comes to Iran. This shit has been happening with Iran for literally thirty years. I know it's fun to think your time on this earth is special and something new is happening but it's not. This same thing happened last year, the year before that, and so on. And it will happen again next year and the year after that.

So calm down and shut the fuck up. Thank you.

[ajrocks]

If there is oil, the US will come!

[jerryb]

If Obama thinks he is going to lose his second term in office he will do something major like a strike on Iran to gain votes as a powerful leader. It has happened many times before just before an election and will probably happen again. Many lives will be lost if he thinks the election is lost in the last few days before election day. Mark my word on this.

[PastorSinAlot]

blow iran the fuck up

[BFT3K]

Originally Posted by jerryb

If Obama thinks he is going to lose his second term in office he will do something major like a strike on Iran to gain votes as a powerful leader. It has happened many times before just before an election and will probably happen again. Many lives will be lost if he thinks the election is lost in the last few days before election day. Mark my word on this.

ALL US Presidents are just fucking hand puppets for the scumbags that puppeteer the planet, so he may not have a choice in the matter.

Most on the left would be more likely to stay home on voting day, than to re-elect a war monger. Bombing Iran for political gain, would be counterproductive at best.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by Dcat

What's wrong with infowars.com?

You'll hear more truth there in a day than you'll find sifting through all the lame stream media horse shit in a year.

because i can go to the guardian uk, i can go to cnn, i can go to canoe or bbc, i can even go to fox news and read a story, filter out the bullshit and propaganda, make a sound decision based on a subject and form my own opinion. If i, instead, go to alternative news websites I'm flooded with FANATICS who take microns of facts and data and ride the slippery slope into a story that equates to science fiction in most peoples eyes instead of reality.

Now i'm not saying that the news sites i check out don't have their share of bs stories, political serving articles and distraction fluff, but they at least make an effort to hold a standard of waiting to hear all the facts before they come out with a story, they don't ever write stories based on assumption, which I find common on sites such as infowars.

If you think i'm wrong explain, i haven't checked out that site in a long time.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by Dcat

What's wrong with infowars.com?

You'll hear more truth there in a day than you'll find sifting through all the lame stream media horse shit in a year.

did u just reference sarah palin?

[2ndxachrm]

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

GD - General Dynamics
NOC - Northrop Grumman
HII - Huntington Ingalls (Just a few months ago NOC split up there ship building into HII. Made me a ton of money. If I recall correctly it was a 2:1 stock split.)
RTN - Raytheon
LMT - Lockheed Martin
TDY - Teledyne Technologies

Heavy hitters. In no real order.

GD is in RI Big ass place

[Paul]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

because i can go to the guardian uk, i can go to cnn, i can go to canoe or bbc, i can even go to fox news and read a story, filter out the bullshit and propaganda, make a sound decision based on a subject and form my own opinion. If i, instead, go to alternative news websites I'm flooded with FANATICS who take microns of facts and data and ride the slippery slope into a story that equates to science fiction in most peoples eyes instead of reality.

Now i'm not saying that the news sites i check out don't have their share of bs stories, political serving articles and distraction fluff, but they at least make an effort to hold a standard of waiting to hear all the facts before they come out with a story, they don't ever write stories based on assumption, which I find common on sites such as infowars.

If you think i'm wrong explain, i haven't checked out that site in a long time.

Nice post