Should the Internet be regulated? Read before you vote. - GoFuckYourself.com

Paul Markham · 01-26-2012, 11:59 AM

With regulation we are seeing some file lockers closing.

With no regulation there is no crime.

This goes for snuff, CP real rape, etc. No to regulation and more victims suffing, yes means people not doing it to profit from it online.

No third option you can't pick and choose laws.

CurrentlySober · 01-26-2012, 12:10 PM

Not again?

You did this a few weeks ago...

alias · 01-26-2012, 12:12 PM

Dear Paul,

Please shut the fuck up.

Regards,

The Internet

martinsc · 01-26-2012, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

Dear Paul,

Please shut the fuck up.

Regards,

The Internet

porno jew · 01-26-2012, 12:19 PM

fuck off ...............

Paul Markham · 01-26-2012, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

Not again?

You did this a few weeks ago...

Yes, with the law bringing down MU and the subsequent actions of other File lockers. I wondered if people would like to rethink their votes.

We also have the thread of people accusing Manwin of owning Filesonic. Without regulation, what's to stop the Internet just becoming a place for people to download free stuff?

Paul Markham · 01-26-2012, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

fuck off ...............

If you said it, I will definitely give it some deep thought.

Done and decided to stick it out here. Took me longer than a heart beat, not as long as 2 though.

The good news is, I went for my quarterly check up today and the Oncologist said I'm a miracle. Not many of the specialist gave me a decent chance of surviving, those who did thought the best scenario was to remove my tongue.

I told her it was the thought of not being around to annoy you that kept me going. Thanks PJ.

BFT3K · 01-26-2012, 03:47 PM

ottopottomouse · 01-26-2012, 04:35 PM

Yes if internet rule #1 is a blanket ban on the over 60s.

DamianJ · 01-26-2012, 04:44 PM

Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws.

HTH

Damian

stocktrader23 · 01-26-2012, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

Dear Paul,

Please shut the fuck up.

Regards,

The Internet

porno jew · 01-26-2012, 04:50 PM

the government is never going to regulate the market to buy your crappy old content. the end.

Wizzo · 01-26-2012, 04:54 PM

If it will stop redundant polls on GFY, then I'm all for it!

sperbonzo · 01-26-2012, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Yes, with the law bringing down MU and the subsequent actions of other File lockers.?

that was not the result of regulation of the internet, that was regulation of copywrite laws.

totally different issue, and we don't need specific internet laws to get this done.

.

Fletch XXX · 01-26-2012, 08:11 PM

i love when people use snuff in examples.

snuff isnt real people. no snuff film has ever been found

the fbi and countless investigations have never turned up a single snuff film, anyone in ADULT should really know this. its like unicorns...

BlackCrayon · 01-26-2012, 08:14 PM

cp is legal online without 'regulation'..? which is such a broad term.

Best-In-BC · 01-26-2012, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

Dear Paul,

Please shut the fuck up.

Regards,

The Internet

:thum bsup

: thumbsup

:thumb sup

:t humbsup:

porno jew · 01-26-2012, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

i love when people use snuff in examples.

snuff isnt real people. no snuff film has ever been found

the fbi and countless investigations have never turned up a single snuff film, anyone in ADULT should really know this. its like unicorns...

there are a few. that stuff films don't exist is corny old shit from the 80s-90s that for some reason people cling to still. google is your friend.

Fletch XXX · 01-26-2012, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

there are a few. that stuff films don't exist is corny old shit from the 80s-90s that for some reason people cling to still. google is your friend.

no, if mankind records videos of himself fucking animals, obviously there are videos of people dying we record anything,..., however, the cult style charlie manson snuff/sex film is totally make believe. if not where are they?

links??

Paul Markham · 01-27-2012, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws.

HTH

Damian

So each country should regulate what's published in their own country. We agree.

melloman · 01-27-2012, 12:28 AM

We are loosing our freedom under obama. He wants to control the internet and many other things.

Paul Markham · 01-27-2012, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

that was not the result of regulation of the internet, that was regulation of copywrite laws.

totally different issue, and we don't need specific internet laws to get this done.

.

So you voted yes. As unregulated means no regulation.

Existing laws should apply to the Internet, does this mean laws since 1970, or whenever the Internet started, no law should include new technology of any kind or just the Internet should be exempt?

Paul Markham · 01-27-2012, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

i love when people use snuff in examples.

snuff isnt real people. no snuff film has ever been found

the fbi and countless investigations have never turned up a single snuff film, anyone in ADULT should really know this. its like unicorns...

Do you think the reason for this is it's hard to monetize the product?

Make it easy and what's the odds?

Obviously you missed the ones that were shown online. The CIA didn't.

Ron Bennett · 01-27-2012, 01:56 AM

The internet has always been regulated. Even more so prior to 1990 when ARPA, and later 1990-1995 when the NSF, called the shots.

As for on-line piracy ... there's lots of case law dating back to the 1980s when BBSes were very popular and facilitating file trading.

In short, much of the on-line legal issues that seem new aren't.

Ron

2012 · 01-27-2012, 02:04 AM

should poo be regulated ?

CyberHustler · 01-27-2012, 02:22 AM

Fuck this poll... time for a joint

Paul Markham · 01-28-2012, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Bennett

The internet has always been regulated. Even more so prior to 1990 when ARPA, and later 1990-1995 when the NSF, called the shots.

As for on-line piracy ... there's lots of case law dating back to the 1980s when BBSes were very popular and facilitating file trading.

In short, much of the on-line legal issues that seem new aren't.

Ron

Don't talk above their pay grade. Obvious to most an unregulated Internet would require Governments to pass laws saying so. Obvious to most is once you have laws pertaining to online, they have to be updated to keep up with technology. Like every other law is.

Still the obvious misses most people here.

All SOPA does is apply existing to laws to people who publish their work in the US in a way that makes it harder to penalise them. If you want to continue pirating, you're free to do so. Just make sure your site isn't targeted at the US, that you don't steal US property and have the backing of US companies. So you don't break existing US laws.

Regulation exists online.
No regulation would need laws to be passed exempting online.

Paul Markham · 01-28-2012, 03:06 AM

No regulation = No DMCA, copyright laws, child porn laws, libel laws, no Internet Neutrality laws, no fraud laws, no theft laws no protection against the Internet declining to the level of the scum and probably the end of the Internet as we know it and earn our living from it. I can take all Manwin's BB's RK's content and put it on one site for free and sell ad space or charge to DL it.

nothing to stop me or anyone else from doing this. Because the Internet is unregulated.

Frank21 · 01-28-2012, 03:21 AM

regulating the internet means no google anymore since it breaks the copyright rules by copying stuff of your website without written permission remember.

Paul Markham · 01-28-2012, 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21

regulating the internet means no google anymore since it breaks the copyright rules by copying stuff of your website without written permission remember.

I think that would covered as "fair use". Best ask GG or your lawyer.

Unregulated means no site with anything that can be pirated. As the pirates would have a field day. Why buy anything pre recorded when you can pirate it? For instance I could take all your sites and give them away for free. Sod DMCA, it doesn't exist. LOL

If we're talking extremes lets keep it extreme.

You have a problem on your site solo porn stars, the preview doesn't work on my FF.

EukerVoorn · 01-28-2012, 04:24 AM

Originally Posted by DamianJ
Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws.

---------------------------------

So each country should regulate what's published in their own country. We agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So each country should regulate what's published in their own country. We agree.

This is problematic.

The best way to fight illegal porn and stolen content is at the roots, thus at server/site owner level. For cp, bestiality, snuff and copyright infringement this is easy and logic. All this is illegal everywhere so it can be dealt with at server/site owner level.

Content that isn't illegal everywhere, for example scat, could/should be blocked at service provider level. It would be impossible for the US to take down a server in Amsterdam because there is scat content distributed to US citizens from that server.

Anyway, yes the internet should be regulated by applying the existing laws to it, don't make new separate laws for the internet. What's illegal in real life is illegal on the internet as well, simple.

stocktrader23 · 01-28-2012, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn

Originally Posted by DamianJ
Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws.

---------------------------------

So each country should regulate what's published in their own country. We agree.

This is problematic.

The best way to fight illegal porn and stolen content is at the roots, thus at server/site owner level. For cp, bestiality, snuff and copyright infringement this is easy and logic. All this is illegal everywhere so it can be dealt with at server/site owner level.

Content that isn't illegal everywhere, for example scat, could/should be blocked at service provider level. It would be impossible for the US to take down a server in Amsterdam because there is scat content distributed to US citizens from that server.

Anyway, yes the internet should be regulated by applying the existing laws to it, don't make new separate laws for the internet. What's illegal in real life is illegal on the internet as well, simple.

You are the smartest scat slinger I know.

EukerVoorn · 01-28-2012, 05:02 AM

Thanks. But how many scat slingers do you know?

Fletch XXX · 01-28-2012, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Obviously you missed the ones that were shown online. The CIA didn't.

If the CIA found true "kill for sex for commercial" release snuff online it would be in the news... How come none of you can provide link to where CIA found snuff... Its on you to prove it exists not me... With no proof of existence this is like unicorns.

the CIA would not hide this and would go public... So where oh where is a link thst says any CIA or FBI has found snuff.

FBI has claimed no for years.

google quickly shows FBI disputes existence of kill for sex for profit videoz

snuff is supposed to be for sale, a commercial product made for money. Links?

Fletch XXX · 01-28-2012, 06:13 AM

here ill go first:

https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+...ient=firefox-a

so here is fbi denying snuff, as a horror movie fanatic ive always wanted to believe in snuff, but its simply not real... i bet you guys think "faces of death" is all real too! lol

if cia found snuff online it would surely be in google...

stocktrader23 · 01-28-2012, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

here ill go first:

https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+...ient=firefox-a

so here is fbi denying snuff, as a horror movie fanatic ive always wanted to believe in snuff, but its simply not real... i bet you guys think "faces of death" is all real too! lol

if cia found snuff online it would surely be in google...

"Faces of Death" was a great way to single out complete morons. Yes idiot, the guy really jumped off of the building and died. There just happened to be someone filming above and below so we could get the multiple angles and seamless cut scene like you're watching a movie.

Come to think of it though, Blair Witch was even better. When someone told you about the new horror movie that was real you KNEW they were sporting an IQ of 82.

jakeuk · 01-28-2012, 06:45 AM

The difficulty with regulating the internet is who will be in charge? If you have the wrong people regulating the internet it could be a disaster. If you have the right wings in charge sites like this one will be shut down, if you have the left wingers regulating it loads of shit that should not be allowed may be allowed so the question is who can make a good job of regulating the internet?

u-Bob · 01-28-2012, 07:02 AM

Murdering someone is a crime... no matter what tool is used to commit that murder. There's no need to make new laws for every new tool, appliance, vehicle,.... in order to prevent people from using it to commit murder. When Ford or Honda brings a new car to market, do we need a new law so people will know they can't use that specific car to deliberately run over people?

Committing fraud is a crime. It doesn't matter if you do it in a face2face setting, using a letter, using a telephone, using sign language, in English or in Japanese or using a computer.

A computer connected to the internet is just another tool. No need to give more power to government bureaucrats.

u-Bob · 01-28-2012, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakeuk

The difficulty with regulating the internet is who will be in charge? If you have the wrong people regulating the internet it could be a disaster. If you have the right wings in charge sites like this one will be shut down, if you have the left wingers regulating it loads of shit that should not be allowed may be allowed so the question is who can make a good job of regulating the internet?

don't worry about that. Paul actually believes that bringing censorship to the internet would somehow boost sales

Frank21 · 01-28-2012, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

You have a problem on your site solo porn stars, the preview doesn't work on my FF.

No the site is ok just FF sucks.
The biggst problem of this amazing website is that noone sees the true value of this top notch top domainname including site/content and everything wich is for sale and looking for a new owner for a small fee.

porno jew · 01-28-2012, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

no, if mankind records videos of himself fucking animals, obviously there are videos of people dying we record anything,..., however, the cult style charlie manson snuff/sex film is totally make believe. if not where are they?

links??

google it asshole. they are out there/

Vendzilla · 01-28-2012, 09:13 AM

Regulation or Censorhip being put in place? Paul wouldn't be able to post this question because the people in charge would be tired of his shit! LOL

Paul Markham · 01-29-2012, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn

Originally Posted by DamianJ
Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws.

---------------------------------

So each country should regulate what's published in their own country. We agree.

This is problematic.

The best way to fight illegal porn and stolen content is at the roots, thus at server/site owner level. For cp, bestiality, snuff and copyright infringement this is easy and logic. All this is illegal everywhere so it can be dealt with at server/site owner level.

Content that isn't illegal everywhere, for example scat, could/should be blocked at service provider level. It would be impossible for the US to take down a server in Amsterdam because there is scat content distributed to US citizens from that server.

Anyway, yes the internet should be regulated by applying the existing laws to it, don't make new separate laws for the internet. What's illegal in real life is illegal on the internet as well, simple.

Well if stopping it at "server/site owner level" worked it would be fine. Sadly on some of the examples, piracy being the worse, it doesn't work.

For content like scat, where it's illegal in the US and legal in another country there are bigger problems. Should a server be forced by law to make sure it's blocked from countries where it is illegal or should a country do the blocking itself. Maybe by the US saying US CC companies are not allowed to process payments, or just waiting for the owner to step onto US soil to arrest him?

Yes offline laws should apply to online laws, it's making them enforceable that's the problem. As Damian says the Internet is Global. So while it may be legal in one country, it gets published world wide in places it's illegal. The existing laws are often powerless in dealing with new technologies. so laws have to be updated to the present day and level of technology.

Paul Markham · 01-29-2012, 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

here ill go first:

https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+...ient=firefox-a

so here is fbi denying snuff, as a horror movie fanatic ive always wanted to believe in snuff, but its simply not real... i bet you guys think "faces of death" is all real too! lol

if cia found snuff online it would surely be in google...

If the definition of a snuff movie is sex and killing, you're right. For me it's a movie with real killing and that's out there from terrorists beheading captives. So it's a difference of definition.

Are you that sure that movies involving sex and death wouldn't appear if the Internet were unregulated?

scarlettcontent · 01-29-2012, 09:44 AM

looks like a big NO

01-26-2012, 12:10 PM	#2
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,614	Not again? You did this a few weeks ago... __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

01-26-2012, 12:12 PM	#3
alias aliasx Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 19,010	Dear Paul, Please shut the fuck up. Regards, The Internet __________________ https://porncorporation.com

01-26-2012, 04:35 PM	#9
ottopottomouse She is ugly, bad luck. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 13,177	Yes if internet rule #1 is a blanket ban on the over 60s. __________________ ↑ see post ↑ 13101

01-26-2012, 04:54 PM	#13
Wizzo 2011 GFY Hall of Fame! Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Back in Texas! Posts: 15,224	If it will stop redundant polls on GFY, then I'm all for it! __________________ Looking for Opportunity!

01-26-2012, 08:11 PM	#15
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	i love when people use snuff in examples. snuff isnt real people. no snuff film has ever been found the fbi and countless investigations have never turned up a single snuff film, anyone in ADULT should really know this. its like unicorns... __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

View Poll Results: Should the Internet be regulated?
Yes	10	31.25%
No	22	68.75%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

01-26-2012, 11:59 AM	#1
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Should the Internet be regulated? Read before you vote. With regulation we are seeing some file lockers closing. With no regulation there is no crime. This goes for snuff, CP real rape, etc. No to regulation and more victims suffing, yes means people not doing it to profit from it online. No third option you can't pick and choose laws. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

01-26-2012, 12:19 PM	#5
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	fuck off ...............

01-26-2012, 03:47 PM	#8
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764

01-26-2012, 04:44 PM	#10
DamianJ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land Posts: 15,808	Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws. HTH Damian

01-26-2012, 04:50 PM	#12
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	the government is never going to regulate the market to buy your crappy old content. the end.

01-26-2012, 08:14 PM	#16
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	cp is legal online without 'regulation'..? which is such a broad term. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

01-27-2012, 12:28 AM	#21
melloman Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 61	We are loosing our freedom under obama. He wants to control the internet and many other things. __________________

01-27-2012, 01:56 AM	#24
Ron Bennett Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,653	The internet has always been regulated. Even more so prior to 1990 when ARPA, and later 1990-1995 when the NSF, called the shots. As for on-line piracy ... there's lots of case law dating back to the 1980s when BBSes were very popular and facilitating file trading. In short, much of the on-line legal issues that seem new aren't. Ron __________________ Domagon - Website Management and Domain Name Sales

01-27-2012, 02:04 AM	#25
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	should poo be regulated ?

01-27-2012, 02:22 AM	#26
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 26,028	Fuck this poll... time for a joint

01-28-2012, 03:06 AM	#28
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	No regulation = No DMCA, copyright laws, child porn laws, libel laws, no Internet Neutrality laws, no fraud laws, no theft laws no protection against the Internet declining to the level of the scum and probably the end of the Internet as we know it and earn our living from it. I can take all Manwin's BB's RK's content and put it on one site for free and sell ad space or charge to DL it. nothing to stop me or anyone else from doing this. Because the Internet is unregulated. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

01-28-2012, 03:21 AM	#29
Frank21 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 733	regulating the internet means no google anymore since it breaks the copyright rules by copying stuff of your website without written permission remember. __________________ www.Rate-My-Pussylips.com - FuckingFetish.com - for sale!!! - ExxGfs.com icq#: 598425939

01-28-2012, 05:02 AM	#33
EukerVoorn So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Les Alpes, France Posts: 1,423	Thanks. But how many scat slingers do you know?

01-28-2012, 06:13 AM	#35
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	here ill go first: https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+...ient=firefox-a so here is fbi denying snuff, as a horror movie fanatic ive always wanted to believe in snuff, but its simply not real... i bet you guys think "faces of death" is all real too! lol if cia found snuff online it would surely be in google... __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me Last edited by Fletch XXX; 01-28-2012 at 06:14 AM..

01-28-2012, 06:45 AM	#37
jakeuk Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: London, UK Posts: 125	The difficulty with regulating the internet is who will be in charge? If you have the wrong people regulating the internet it could be a disaster. If you have the right wings in charge sites like this one will be shut down, if you have the left wingers regulating it loads of shit that should not be allowed may be allowed so the question is who can make a good job of regulating the internet?

01-28-2012, 07:02 AM	#38
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	Murdering someone is a crime... no matter what tool is used to commit that murder. There's no need to make new laws for every new tool, appliance, vehicle,.... in order to prevent people from using it to commit murder. When Ford or Honda brings a new car to market, do we need a new law so people will know they can't use that specific car to deliberately run over people? Committing fraud is a crime. It doesn't matter if you do it in a face2face setting, using a letter, using a telephone, using sign language, in English or in Japanese or using a computer. A computer connected to the internet is just another tool. No need to give more power to government bureaucrats.

01-28-2012, 09:13 AM	#42
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,200	Regulation or Censorhip being put in place? Paul wouldn't be able to post this question because the people in charge would be tired of his shit! LOL __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

01-29-2012, 09:44 AM	#45
scarlettcontent www.scarlettcontent.net Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleiades Posts: 6,031	looks like a big NO __________________ Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print. Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices. Over 40 years in the adult industry. [email protected] Follow us on twitter.