GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Men who raise step-kids. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1053798)

mchacal 01-17-2012 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 18693521)
What if you are dating a girl with kids and you fall in love with the kids also? I have two friends that this happened to and it worked out great for everybody.


.:2 cents:


.

That's impossible to happen to me. As soon as I know she got children I'm gone so no chance I get to know them

SleazyDream 01-17-2012 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi (Post 18693418)
The original point is you are a genetic failure if you are raising another man's kids. Haven't seen anything to disprove that point as of yet. Just deluded losers trying to transpose status and some kind of meaning into their failed lives via someone else's kids.

Surely the real Alpha is the father of the kids who got some loser beta to raise, pay for and protect his offspring. It's the ultimate ownage in life. Even homeless, smack dealing child molesters look down on such failures.

That statement pretty much proves you're a total idiot.

You're a genetic failure if you don't sire children, the genetic success part has nothing to do with who raises them, just that your genetic children live long enough to reproduce.

Scott McD 01-17-2012 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mchacal (Post 18693509)
By the way you can't compare being a stepfather to adoption. You're adopting because you want the children while as a stepfather you just wants to get into mom's pussy

Sounds about right... :2 cents:

bronco67 01-17-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi (Post 18693418)
The original point is you are a genetic failure if you are raising another man's kids. Haven't seen anything to disprove that point as of yet. Just deluded losers trying to transpose status and some kind of meaning into their failed lives via someone else's kids.

Surely the real Alpha is the father of the kids who got some loser beta to raise, pay for and protect his offspring. It's the ultimate ownage in life. Even homeless, smack dealing child molesters look down on such failures.

You appear to be a real asshole, but I can't argue with your logic. If I was ever going to be a stepfather, the girl had better look like Olivia Wilde, and have 2 hot sisters that she allows to sleep in our bed.

Matyko 01-17-2012 11:01 AM

Only parents should be allowed to post in this thread. Thos who are not yet, just bookmark this thread, open it a few years later, and cry.

Roald 01-17-2012 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Choopa Phil (Post 18693141)
My mother remarried and my step father is who i consider my dad and father. Always treated me like an equal and never made me feel different.

Same here :2 cents:

Raised me and my sister from my 3rd and when I look at the person I am today I think he did a pretty damn good job.

SmokeyTheBear 01-17-2012 11:38 AM

your theory has flaws..

If a man can't create his own kids , he is already a genetic failure, raising someone else's kids makes zero difference in passing his genetics along.

But i think your argument is more that if a man already has kids and gains someone else's he is decreasing his chances of genetic success. I am not sure that theory holds much water. If so does having more than one child increase or decrease your chances of genetic success ?

Lets say i have 1 child and marry a woman with 2 children. Does my child now only get 1/3 the resources because i have to share time/money with 3 children instead of 1 ? Wouldn't the same hold true if i had 3 children of my own ?

nico-t 01-17-2012 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream (Post 18693600)
That statement pretty much proves you're a total idiot.

says gfy's biggest (both literally and figuratively) idiot. :1orglaugh

ilnjscb 01-17-2012 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18693661)
Same here :2 cents:

Raised me and my sister from my 3rd and when I look at the person I am today I think he did a pretty damn good job.

Just like everything there are good and bad. However, there is no disputing the well documented stats that children fare better (again, in general) with their real fathers.

That doesn't mean there aren't thousands and thousands of cases where the dad is a douchebag and the SD is good, or where both are good guys.

SmokeyTheBear 01-17-2012 11:45 AM

using the same logic. If i make 100k a year and have 3 children on my own , they each get 1/3 of that ( approx 33k ). If i marry a woman who has 1 child and also makes 100k , the combined earnings would be 200k / 4 , so now each of my children will have 50k

I just increased my childrens genetic success by having stepkids.. ( and i get laid and dinner made ) , who is the fool now. :winkwink:

nico-t 01-17-2012 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18693704)
your theory has flaws..

If a man can't create his own kids , he is already a genetic failure, raising someone else's kids makes zero difference in passing his genetics along.

But i think your argument is more that if a man already has kids and gains someone else's he is decreasing his chances of genetic success. I am not sure that theory holds much water. If so does having more than one child increase or decrease your chances of genetic success ?

Lets say i have 1 child and marry a woman with 2 children. Does my child now only get 1/3 the resources because i have to share time/money with 3 children instead of 1 ? Wouldn't the same hold true if i had 3 children of my own ?

you missed the point of the theory.

Guy 1 fucks a girl, and they get kids.
guy 1 bails on her and the kids.
guy 2 comes along and puts his time & money in kids that aren't his.

You can compare it to a car you own, and the mechanic who repairs and maintains it, doesnt get paid. Like slave labour.

lol.

Jack Sparrow 01-17-2012 11:51 AM

Why people even argue with retards like this is beyond me.
Just put him on ignore, the only success he has is luring you in with his trollbait and you guys are easy fishin..

DarkJedi 01-17-2012 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream (Post 18693600)
That statement pretty much proves you're a total idiot.

I understand your daddy left you by the curb. Tough shit.

DarkJedi 01-17-2012 01:08 PM

Lotta butthurt stepdads in this thread.

:1orglaugh

DarkJedi 01-17-2012 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newB (Post 18693514)
You want to start over and better clarify whatever statement you are trying to make?

By your latest definition, Brad Pitt, Ashton Kutcher, and Kurt Russell are just a few examples of those "genetic failures" who have failed at life, while rapists, dead beat dads and countless sperm donors are the Alpha male "winners". :Oh crap


Brad Pitt = mild mannered Beta who freely admits he had little success with women before he got famous. Is hitched to apex batshit nutjob.

Ashton Kutcher = borderline fag prettyboy opportunist with an excellent PR operation

Kurt Russell = never heard of him



Keep benchmarking your entire value system on the media, tard.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123