Because of your lack of comprehension (please take a course in reading comprehenison), or maybe you may just be limited by your IQ level (if so a course in reading comprehension could still be helpful), you do not have the ability to understand what their arguements are and if they confirm everything that you have posted. I can assure you that they have not and would not confirm eveything that you have posted, it is just your lack of comprehension that leads you to believe that they confirm everything that you have posted.

Sweeping and generalized statements such as this do nothing to advance your point. This only proves that you have nothing to say to truly rebut anthing I have posted. Simply saying "your statements or sources have been rebutted" does not make those statements or sources rebutted. Where is your proof? Where are your arguments? I hope you are aware enough to make that distinction.

Imagine if in any debate party A details a strong a argument and and party B simply responds with "your statements have all been rebutted". Party B would be laughed out of the debating hall.

Fitting indeed. It is time for that handle change that I suggested earlier.

:glugglug

What are people still arguing about?
Doesn't a world without the middle east make sense?

My point is your comprehension level is low. I am not posting to debate you. I am not posting to educate you as I do not have the time nor the inclination. You can educate yourself with the "rest of the story" if you desire too, but you don't have an interest in doing that. You are either trolling or you are just not very bright. Personally I think that it is a combination of both.

Of course this has to do with oil... Saudi Arabia is scared shitless...

y'all crack me up... you'll spend $1 plus on a bottle of water.. but I damn guarantee you would all be fuckin' up in arms if gasoline was $5 plus a gallon... you couldn't afford to drive your bling blings around ;-))


honestly... I think we should just pull the fuck out.. and protect our own boarders.. quit helping everyone else out... let them blow themselves up, let them starve.. let their land be taken away... everyone wants the US to police the world... but then no one wants to back the reprimands... :ak47:

don't get me wrong i'm not for war... i'm for not spending my damn tax dollar on protecting every other country in the world just to get spit back on...

i'm done now...

:thumbsup

Only thing I have to say to Iraq:

All your base are belong to us.

So basically pull out of all international agreements and trades? Hate to break it to you...but the US has next to nothing as far as resources go. Most of our products and resources cme from over seas (both ways).

Here's my simple explanation for those who believe in all these conspiracy theories:

1) You have no mind thought of your own, so someone tells you about the 'real' way and you say "Hey, that sounds good!" so you go and believe some underground source (blah blah, we regurgitate news sources, say what you want).

2) You feel you've found something 'special' that nobody knows about, so you back it up wholeheartingly and sell yourself of every single thought they say.

You have a good point and I clearly remember what you are referring to.

However, to say that Bush is as much to blame as Saddam for what happened to the Kurds is preposterous. If I see someone getting mugged and don't jump in to help, I may not have made a noble decision but the mugger is more to blame than I.

Funniest post of the day. :thumbsup

:thumbsup :thumbsup

You consider yourself informed because you read the following?

"The CIA for Dummies"

"The Idiots Guide to the National Security Agency"

"How to Make One Million Dollars from your Home Business" (How's that working out by the way?)

"How to Form your own Militia in 30 days or Less"

"The News Media Conspiracy Guide"

Sad ...

Really? So the plane that crashed in the field was what? Seems to me that the passengers took action.

Also maybe the hijackers had the "box cutters" at someones throat, and maybe the pilots had more compassion then the hijackers and felt they could hold off the attack. Very easy to judge and palyout your scenes without being there.

Yet again, I don't know where to begin with your idiocy. First off, if I was the pilot of a plane (with another next to me) and we were both trained Navy Seals (I bet most have little to no military experience, perhaps boot camp - nothing to back this up, just what I'd assume), and four men had box cutters to my throat, I would give little resistance (especially since I didn't know what their intent was...perhaps they wanted us to land at another airbase so they could take one of the men on board hostage, a politician or a drug smuggler that owed them money, anything). I would comply 100% with these men, and hope for the best. I'm sure the other passengers on board had the same mentality.

The men on the flight that hit in the field knew the intention of the terrorists, thus taking action. Your unintelligence really bothers me...I hope there's not too many more people that think like you. Have fun being brainwashed by "Beginners Guide to Media Deception" (or any of the other books mentioned in the above post). You certainly are a master at international affairs by reading them!