Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18572402)

I hope you are not trying to guess who I support. :2 cents:



So, put all of the overseas US military personnel out of work?

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 18572646)

Most of you continue to make this about the 2 party paradigm, what else is new. You will forever be stuck in the mindset of "Republican vs. Democrat."

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 18572646)

Most of you continue to make this about the 2 party paradigm, what else is new. You will forever be stuck in the mindset of "Republican vs. Democrat."

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18572449)

Go for it republicans, nominate him.

Bet ya can't - so surprise me, surprise the whole world.

If he ran against Obama, I'd vote for him. He's the only half sane non-slimy person you republicans can get to run for the job so far.

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 18572646)

Most of you continue to make this about the 2 party paradigm, what else is new. You will forever be stuck in the mindset of "Republican vs. Democrat."

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18572602)

And what do those show? That Ron Paul could read some reports and deduct.. just like many others did and have, that there would be a burst of the bubble and the shit would hit the fan? That there would be a ton of propaganda about Iran? Well shit, people on this board have been saying that for years now... None of that makes him special or a saviour. You guys have some true believer shit going on.. And like all true believers you wear blinders and only see/hear what supports your beliefs. Just like the whole Ron Paul gets shut out of the mainstream media... Oh please... When the "news" isn't filled with sex scandals and other sensational crap, I hear about Ron Paul just as much as I hear about other candidates. In fact, I've seen him on more talk shows etc than any other candidate... When I think about it, I don't think I've seen Perry, Romney, Cain etc. on any.

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 18572644)

This thread is fucking awesome....... a circular firing squad between the Marxists and the mental patients. Good luck to both sides.

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18572515)

Thank you for proving to me beyond a doubt that you're nothing more than a troll.

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18572667)

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18572677)

what's a troll?

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18572465)

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18572622)

This thread is chock full of retarded motherfuckers that can't comprehend simple statements.

And to IllTestYourGirls or whoever, several states would ban abortion almost instantly if given the ability to do so. You are naive, trolling or downright stupid to think otherwise. Many other issues just like that one.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18572600)

National Guard is not who is stationed in Japan, Germany, Belgium, etc, etc. There is a lot of personnel besides "soldiers" who have their families over there. You are just going to uproot them too?

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18572663)

Wrong... President Ron Paul would accomplish very little because laws are passed by the two party houses... If he truly wanted to make a difference, he would have started another party or joined/led the Libertarian Party or Constitution Party. That's one of the few ways the system could be changed, the rise of a powerful third party outside the system. But he didn't do that. Instead, he's a republican which makes him part of the problem and flies in the face of his ideals.

I have more respect for guys like Ross Perot that actually tried to make a difference in the system.

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18572547)

yes and yes...

or are you a communist and I did not realize it? You are a conservative no?? Or maybe i am wrong about you. It seems by your posts you are but maybe you are a socialist/marxist type. Cause you do realize the government borrows 40 cents of every dollar they spend right? you do understand that we borrow money from china to fund the troops in korea, and japan, and germany etc right? And therefore you personally... yes you... are subsidizing those countries since they dont need to spend so much for defense, allowing them to focus that money on their industries. You do get that right? or no, probably not. So that would be a socialist/communist/marxist type of stance. Wealth redistribution. I thought you were against the occupy wall street crowd and wealth redistribution? Or is it that you are for wealth redistribution as long as it's not for americans? if the money is sent to germany instead you are cool with that? Ok i see. NP. Gotcha-

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18572450)

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18572680)

You're on the net... look it up..

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18572523)

has to do with you. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18572652)

Obama obviously by your statement. . . . Simply because if you want the military to be "job creators" . . .

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18572493)

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18572525)

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18572271)

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut (Post 18572796)

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18572661)

seriously bro, what makes you think ron paul supporters are necesarilly republican? i meant i aint slammin you, and i know he's running on the republican side but he has a lot of people who support him who are not republican... i know, i am one of them LOL

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18572283)

I love the guy but he has some fucked up ideas that would never in a million years fly.

Originally Posted by Emil (Post 18572985)

Post examples of his crazy ideas?
Why wouldn't it be possible to end the Fed and let the government take care of it instead?

Originally Posted by glamourmodels (Post 18572312)

@Coup: Thanks for proving my point that you fear him and cant refute his positions. :thumbsup

I challenge anyone here to watch the video above and dispute anything Ron Paul has to say. However, my guess is that the best anyone can do is "he cant win", "he's old", "he has bad hair", "he smells" etc. Nothing of any substance whatsoever, just vapid, ad hominem cheap shots, which says more about you than him IMO-

Originally Posted by Emil (Post 18572985)

Post examples of his crazy ideas?
Why wouldn't it be possible to end the Fed and let the government take care of it instead?

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18572776)

:1orglaugh

The military always has been, throughout history.

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 18572678)

Maybe he should stop being so passive and actually "attack" the others like they do so that they can say more words and score brownie points by throwing out the popular political talking points... You guys make him look like a cry baby as opposed to an underdog.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18572724)

You don't get me because I call it as I see it. I don't have an agenda, I'm not swayed by what I read in the news or watch in the news, or what I watch on the nightly news. I don't fit into preconceived labels.

I was asking why we still have troops in Korea fifty years later. Are we still concerned that North Korea is gonna invade South Korea if we leave? Doubt it.

Why do we have troops in Europe? Japan? Do we really need seven fucking US Navy bases in Italy? Six in Japan?

Keep one base per region. One Navy base for Europe, one for Asia, one for the Middle East. Bring the rest home already. Fuck Iraq and Afghanistan already, let them fuck themselves.

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18572803)

too late, the damage has been done. My handlers even paid me a bonus for that one and everything.

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 18572960)

Ahhh, because only the republicans can nominate him for the republican candidacy, and hes running for the republican candidacy.

If you can get him to run independent go for it.

Otherwise, I don't care who supports him, he's running for the republican candidacy, so voting for him as things stand means voting republican.

If he's elected he can only govern with the support of the republican political machine. He's a republican, he says he's a republican, he says he wont go independent - so we shall see.

Vote him in - I'm all for it.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 18572962)

Ron Paul.... a man with ideas but with no plans.

Where is the audio of Ron Paul explaining how he is going to implement, adjust, replace, and account for the massive changes he plans on putting through? Where are the guesses as to what will happen, how, when and in what order?

He has some great ideas, with zero plan of action.... that's a fail waiting to happen.

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 18572996)

See that's your first problem.. you listen to sound bytes and not reality.. The fact Ron Paul is doing well in polls just shows you how bad the other GOP candidates are.

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 18573005)

Anything is "possible". The question is "how" and "what is the plan to transition away from these institutions without upsetting the value of the currency, the markets, foreign investment in our debt etc etc etc etc etc.

Anyone can say "its possible". Technically, quantum physics tells us its possible to walk through a brick wall that doesn't mean its a realistic or practical plan to get to the other side of the wall.