-
love science! -
What if we can finally harness neutrinos' power and have faster-than-light travel. Awesome!
Comment
-
that is very interesting news ...The Best Web Hosting Plan ... Amerinoc.com / Unlimited Transfer / Unlimited Web Space / Unlimited Domains / Unlimited Email + Databases ... And much more at Amerinoc.comComment
-
nice! i had posted when they first announced this "break-thru" ... good to see they were able to reproduce thisThere aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
-
Cool article, thanks for sharing!Comment
-
Unfortunately if i count well they travel just around 0.01% faster than light and you must not have any significant weight and electric charge (it means no electron, proton, atom, molecule and anything other we consists of). So i do not see any exact use for our traveling there. But surely it might be important for theoretical physics and bring some revolution there.Comment
-
They are idiots.Comment
-
Caused by either dark mater/energy or hyperdimentional physics (first proposed in the 1800s).Comment
-
Comment
-
Cool
Comment
-
the answer is 12Comment
-
4+8=?
oh wait!Comment
-
It occurs to me that if in fact neutrinos do go 1.000025 times the speed of photons after compensating for gravitational curving as the particle falls and the angular momentum induced by the earth, that may not mean anything, really. Light travels at different speeds through different materials. We have thought that C was the speed of light (photons) in a vacuum. Maybe C is actually the speed of neutrinos, not photons, so it's 0.00025 times faster. That doesn't change E=MC2. It only means that C is a tiny but faster than we thought.Last edited by raymor; 11-18-2011, 11:05 PM.For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroidsComment
-
By the way, there is a really cool serious on PBS called "The Fabric of the Cosmos", hosted by David Greene. Tonight's episode was all about Quantum Theory. Excellent show. There's another one called "Into the wormhole" hosted by Morgan Freemon which is also pretty good. I love PBS.Comment
-
Comment
-
Around since 1997, and the company that introduced "Cascading Billing" in MPA3® Affiliate Management and Tracking Software
Outsourcing With A Norwegian Twist - NordBits - Inquire within!Comment
-
I said it before, but what if they do not travel faster then light, but make use of multidimensions to get from a->b.
THAT would be interesting!Comment
-
Fuck off DVTimes you scamming lying cuntbag.Comment
-
I suspect that ultimately it will be learned that there is a miscalculation.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
Shoot your hot Neutrinos all over my titsComment
-
Comment
-
By the way I find more cool another experiment published recently, the "creation" of matter (photons) from empty vacuum i.e. from nothing and nowhere, stuff can popup and keep alive, like magicians, gods or star trek:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1118133050.htm
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/1106....2011.346.html
The real stuff with the math is there:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.0178v1Comment
-
This to build the creation machine:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.4714v1
Basically the empty space is simply cobntinuous "creation" of matter+antimatter couple of particles that exist and annihilate (destroy in couples) continuously, so you see nothing. If you can avoid them to collide and annihilate, so if you kick one of the 2 for example to go away, these matter pieces would theorically keep in existence since not annihilated as normally planned by quantum theory. There are a few dimensions so I am unsure we can talk of creation, could be simply they change dimension so creation and annihilation is relative to this our dimension only, but what we do know? Very little.Comment
-
Comment