Michael Moore?s Massive Michigan Vacation Mansion Beyond 99 Percent?s Wildest Dreams [PHOTOS]

[DaddyHalbucks]

Exclusive Photos: Michael Moore?s Massive Michigan Vacation Mansion Beyond 99 Percent?s Wildest Dreams


http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ab...ildest-dreams/

[DaddyHalbucks]

The comments are hilarious:

EdSki· 11 hours ago
What a shame to have such a lovely home and not be able to fit through the door.
Report
Reply
9 replies · active 3 hours ago
+39
MisterMyst's avatar - Go to profile

MisterMyst 71p · 11 hours ago
This would have really been useful back in 2004-ish when Moore actually had mainstream clout, but better late than never. If it's too late to discredit the man, we can STILL discredit what he stands for.
Report
Reply
2 replies · active 10 hours ago
+62
Malachi42's avatar - Go to profile

Malachi42 100p · 11 hours ago
He needs a vacation from all the hard work he does, you can get very tired twisting factoids.
Report
Reply
+50
peterfny's avatar - Go to profile

peterfny 97p · 11 hours ago
A hypocritical lefty! You don't say! ;-)
Report
Reply
+20
DarksShadowShow's avatar - Go to profile

DarksShadowShow 75p · 11 hours ago
Michael Moore's Massive Michigan Vacation Mansion
I see what you did there!
Report
Reply
+24
Kristinb5's avatar - Go to profile

Kristinb5 82p · 11 hours ago
Oh come on! Michael Moore says that he is not a millionaire and I sure do believe him He is just like the 99% he pretends to support.
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 5 hours ago
+77
DMartyr's avatar - Go to profile

DMartyr 68p · 11 hours ago
Slightly OT, Alec Baldwin has a huge $12million apartment just a couple of blocks from Zuccotti park. I've tweeted him repeatedly asking if he'd be willing to share it with a few #occupy protesters, since he supports them so much, but he never replies...
Report
Reply
3 replies · active 5 hours ago
+31
Luisced's avatar - Go to profile

Luisced 97p · 11 hours ago
Probably afforded it by outsourcing any work and hiring only contractors whom he does not have to provide benefits for.
Report
Reply
+52
Mf73's avatar - Go to profile

Mf73 56p · 11 hours ago
Now we need photos and adresses of ALL union leaders big an small.
Report
Reply
+32
edhurly's avatar - Go to profile

edhurly 77p · 11 hours ago
Good Lord, most 1%ers would be envious of this spread.
Report
Reply
+52
SteveInFL's avatar - Go to profile

SteveInFL 80p · 11 hours ago
All good things come to those who wait. Gasbag Moore is finally getting a dose of his own medicine. He's being confronted and called out on his lies just like he loved to ambush people in his films. Only unlike his films it does not have be to edited and staged. Moore was always a fraud now it's finally out there for everyone to see.
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 10 hours ago
+32
Climbr880's avatar - Go to profile

Climbr880 96p · 11 hours ago
I wonder if any of his OWS buddies would find the name "Torch Lake" to be suggestive.
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 5 hours ago
+21
Walter90's avatar - Go to profile

Walter90 89p · 11 hours ago
This just goes to show that money won't buy you taste. This house is UGLY!
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 5 hours ago
+27
HoR_Emperor's avatar - Go to profile

HoR_Emperor 111p · 11 hours ago
Hilarious!

What a moral idiot this fat bag of fail is.
Report
Reply
+20
Melanerpes's avatar - Go to profile

Melanerpes 82p · 11 hours ago
At least P. T. Barnum didn't bore (or is that boar?) his suckers to death.
Report
Reply
+19
ironked's avatar - Go to profile

ironked 72p · 11 hours ago
It is a tad busy looking, Walt, but the surroundings look lovely. I'm surprised it isn't more. $1M really is not much for a celebrity cabin. Wonder how much his "working" home cost? If it's Hollywood it's probably a minimum of $15M. Fat hypocrite.
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 10 hours ago
+17
gb8898's avatar - Go to profile

gb8898 114p · 11 hours ago
That's one big ass house for one big ass.

A few questions:

First, where's the cattle pasture? We know he eats at least one cow per day. Is a new one delivered each morning the way the milk man used to bring milk?

Second, he obviously has access to the lake, but is the lake deep enough to handle the size of vessel required to transport someone of Mr. Moore's rotundity? Or does he simply float on the lake and allow local wildlife to perch on him like a small island?
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 10 hours ago
+21
yeahyouright's avatar - Go to profile

yeahyouright 97p · 11 hours ago
yeah but Gore's is bigger and the BBQ is better in Tennessee
Report
Reply
+11
WVSickFreak's avatar - Go to profile

WVSickFreak 105p · 10 hours ago
The house has to be that large in order to fit Moore's supply of ice cream, cookie dough and lard.
Report
Reply
+29
Buckipatriot's avatar - Go to profile

Buckipatriot 85p · 10 hours ago
Lake homes for me, but not for thee!
Report
Reply
+18
sammybull's avatar - Go to profile

sammybull 109p · 10 hours ago
Moore is a snake oil salesman as per the definition. "selling a product that has been proven to not live up to the vendor's marketing hype"

More power to the fat bastard for living large. What sort of sickness or mental ailment troubles him so when his imaginary enemies achieve the same lifestyle?
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 10 hours ago
+25
EmperorCheese's avatar - Go to profile

EmperorCheese 91p · 10 hours ago
But he needs a lake front house.
There isn't a bath tub he can fit into.
Report
Reply
2 replies · active 9 hours ago
+19
civiltruth24's avatar - Go to profile

civiltruth24 -21p · 10 hours ago
Looks like a great relocation spot for the various Occupations after the locals evict them. Plenty room for their tents and portapotties, abundant water supplies, fuel for the fires, and surely Michael wouldn't mind providing some food for the hungry. Some electric generators, and a satellite hook-up and and they're all set. Seems like a win-win to me.

And then maybe some of the other celebrity supporters could open up their properties too. It would be a new trend, just like in Dr. Zhivago.
Report
Reply
1 reply · active 10 hours ago
+7
HollyW79's avatar - Go to profile

HollyW79 64p · 10 hours ago
According to the Daily Rash, Michael Moore told Maury Povich that he's "pretty sure" he experienced an erection the TSA agents pat him down at a Michigan airport. http://www.thedailyrash.com/michael-moore-pretty-...
Report
Reply
2 replies · active 10 hours ago
+13
AZCobraman's avatar - Go to profile

AZCobraman 97p · 10 hours ago
Wow, that place could a LOT of Twinkies!

[epitome]

The article and the comments just prove they don't get it. Doesn't surprise me though.

[Coup]

Yet another butthurt article from noted conservative writer Andrew Breibart.

Thanks for sharing!

[Mutt]

damn, that's a beautiful lake home for only 1 mil.

[EddyTheDog]

Property is so cheap in the US...

That's a 10 million dollar property in the UK at least.

[Rochard]

That's not Micheal Moore's house. That's his fucking vacation home.

I noticed that Moore was at one of the OWS protests and I'm like "He's got to be a millionaire, what is he doing there?". Don't worry, I'm sure he'll make a movie about this movement and the plight of the 99% and make some money off that too.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

Way to take words out of context:

Moore's motivation has always been to spread a message. I think he would continue to do what he does whether he got rich doing it or just eeked out an existence.

I don't know if he falls in the same category of people who get rich because they know how to create tax shelters, exploit tax code loop holes, or outsource production to China.

Just because he's rich doesn't automatically discredit his message.

Peaceful, lawful protest -- if it is effective ? is innately disruptive of "business as usual."

That is why it is effective.

The Soviet Union was brought down by peaceful mass protest that blocked the streets and filled public squares.

Many white residents of Birmingham Alabama in the 1960s would have said it was very disruptive to have all these African Americans marching through Birmingham or protesting the murder of children in churches.

The addresses by Dr. King on the Mall were disruptive of the daily life of D.C. King himself marched without permits when permits were unlawfully applied.

It is disruptive to sit at a whites-only counter and refuse to move and be covered with soda and pelted with debris and dragged off by police.

When Bonus Marches -- thousands of unemployed and desperate former veterans who had been promised and denied their bonus checks in the Depression, which they needed to feed their families -- camped out for months on the Mall in D.C. and sat daily (when this was possible) on the steps of Congress, they won, eventually, because of the disruption.

Some of the power of real protest, which is peaceful and patient and civil but disruptive, comes from the emotional power of the human face-to-face: all those Congress people had to look those hungry men in the eyes on their way to legislate the decision about the bonus.

Imagine...

ADG

[the Shemp]

yes, there are wealthy left wingers ...

[2MuchMark]

Mr. Michael Moore is the man. I'd congratulate him on owning such a beautiful home, and thank him for his films.

[kane]

Just because someone is liberal and far left doesn't mean they are automatically poor. I'm not defending Moore, I think he has tens of millions and doesn't want to admit it, but there are more millionaire democrats in the house and senate than republicans. In the Senate alone 7 of the 10 wealthiest members are democrats.

Having money doesn't mean you can't sympathize with those who are struggling.

[Coup]

Originally Posted by the Shemp

yes, there are wealthy left wingers ...

Yeah but they aren't allowed to show support for the OWS movement because that would make them hypocrites for whatever reason! LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THAT HOUSE FOR GODS SAKE. WAY TOO MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR HIM TO BE TROTTING AROUND WITH LOWLY PROTESTORS.

heh

[Cherry7]

Judge people by what they say and do.

Micheal Moore is talking sense and should be supported, if he stops then stop supporting him, simple.

[DudeRick]

[seeandsee]

What a shame to have such a lovely home and not be able to fit through the door. - this comment wins :D

[Lykos]

Originally Posted by seeandsee

What a shame to have such a lovely home and not be able to fit through the door. - this comment wins :D

Hehe yeah its good one

[glamourmodels]

So Michael Morre is a hypocritical douchebag? Wow, you really broke that story wide open there Daddy, Pulitzer for you! And so what... by implication you are suggesting that because of Moore's tangential relationship to Occupy because he supports them, in your feeble mind that equates to some kind of invalidation on the larger movement and their concerns? Must be nice to live in such a fantasy world where you can make such irrational leaps of logic to support your own narrow world view. Congrats-

[TheDoc]

Moron, plenty of the 99%'s are millionaires.... now if ows was only anti-money or anti-success, then your stupidity would be nail on.

[cherrylula]

that house isn't even worth a million bucks... I bet he could afford several.

[Relentless]

Originally Posted by Mutt

damn, that's a beautiful lake home for only 1 mil.

It's in Michigan

You can get a nice place on any other 3rd world area for similar prices ;)

[CamTraffic]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Property is so cheap in the US...

That's a 10 million dollar property in the UK at least.

Compare the size of the UK with the US and you have an equation!

[Fletch XXX]

Texas is bigger than France heheh

[raymor]

Moore has admitted that films are fictional. He's just one more guy making big bucks un the envy and victimhood industry. Just like Al Sharpton and rest making millions vy selling the victimhood excuse. Nothing special.

[cykoe6]

Micheal Moore is just your typical hypercritical limousine leftist....... preaching sustainability and egalitarianism to the the unwashed masses while he lives like king. A real scumbag. I cannot decide it it is amusing or sad to see the pathetic OWS mutts defend him.

[tony286]

He was never hid that he had money. Whats your point? I also love when people call him a loser. What have you done?

[tony286]

Originally Posted by cykoe6

Micheal Moore is just your typical hypercritical limousine leftist....... preaching sustainability and egalitarianism to the the unwashed masses while he lives like king. A real scumbag. I cannot decide it it is amusing or sad to see the pathetic OWS mutts defend him.

He never preached that, Yeah a scumbag not like that guys on wall st that caused the economy to go down the toilet or pressure companies to send their jobs overseas for shareholder value.

[mopek1]

People don't get it. He's not even CLOSE to being in the 1% ....

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by **********

Mr. Michael Moore is the man. I'd congratulate him on owning such a beautiful home, and thank him for his films.

yeah, but your the guy who just finished saying that armageddon was one of your all time favourite movies...

maybe they should be thanking and congratulating you... haha


Oh hey, when we going to start occupy Michael Moore's house? it's really not that far from me... could be sweet!

[ottopottomouse]

So what? He earned it.

[nation-x]

The thing that you and most conservatives miss is that your argument is based on the media narrative that the protests are against ANYONE who might be in the 1%. That is a false narrative... the protest isn't to protest wealth. It is to protest crony capitalism, corporate control of our government and plutocratic fascism.

The "1%" is a metaphoric term for those who fit the plutocratic mold... not to describe only wealthy people. Here is a shocker for you... there are a lot of wealthy people who are supporting the Occupy protests through dollars and physical presence. Michael Moore is only one of those.

The reason conservatives don't like Michael Moore is because he has become successful pointing out their bullshit.

[helterskelter808]

I can't stand Moore and never have done. I'm convinced he's a Republican and a genuine NRA supporter, because his incessant whining, along with his harassment of Charlton Heston, are some of the few things that have ever made me even remotely sympathetic towards Bush and gun loons. He's parasitically feeding off the OWS movement because he has a book to promote. No book, and you wouldn't hear a peep from him.

That said, the right-wing cranks in this thread really are dumbfucks with, as usual, nothing to say. Criticizing him because he's fat? Really? All these years and that's still the best you can do? Yeah, he's fat, which definitely places him among 99% of Americans and 101% of Republican voters.

And he's rich? Where did the myth arise that left wing = poor? Left wing/communist is not about being poor and it never has been. On the contrary it's about making the poorest people better off.

Serious question, why are right-wingers so ridiculously, insanely stupid? I mean it, why?

[nation-x]

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Serious question, why are right-wingers so ridiculously, insanely stupid? I mean it, why?

I don't think that it's fair to use a wide brush like that and say that all right wingers are stupid... they aren't. However, most of their positions are based on ideology and are supported by faith. Logic <> Faith

[John-ACWM]

LOL some hilarious comments indeed!

[Kevin Marx]

First of all, I obviously like to type, so if you don't like reading then GFY and move on to the next post.

Originally Posted by kane

Having money doesn't mean you can't sympathize with those who are struggling.

True, but having money and not putting it where your mouth is does make you a bit of a hypocrite. My biggest problem with the left is that the ideology tends to be towards the betterment of society... however, it's the betterment of society off of the backs of everyone else.

I don't take a politician seriously that is uber wealthy and wants to make wealthy people pay more taxes but finds a way to ensure that he doesn't or hasn't paid them (insert choice of left wing or RINO politician here; I actually do have a beef with conservatives as well, it just doesn't tend to be with taxes, although they like to tax too). If a politician were to show by action and say..... I have not been taxed enough and I think I should pay more; not to political parties, not to campaign funds, but to the general fund of the United States of America... and then show off the receipt of that payment that shows them meeting the taxation they desire without deduction or loophole or anything else; then that's a politician I will take seriously. Otherwise, they are just blowing smoke and they desire everyone else to pay at that level but themselves.

Remember that the laws tend to favor those that create and vote for them.

Originally Posted by tony286

He never preached that, Yeah a scumbag not like that guys on wall st that caused the economy to go down the toilet or pressure companies to send their jobs overseas for shareholder value.

Tony. You and I have spoken many times before. I like you. I think you are a good guy, so this is not personal at all, just commentary against your commentary.

Companies operate within laws, just as individuals do. If you don't like the laws, change your representation. I'm a moderate-conservative and I want my representation changed.

There is too much cronyism in politics and I think the idea gets spilled over into where the money flows (the economy; i.e. capitalism). Too much you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours.

Yes, we have some unethical and moralistically lacking corporate leaders. I'm all for prosecuting the shit out of them. However, the OWS movement seems to be attacking people that are successful within the law as well. My question is when does success become too great? When is it not acceptable? Why do we as a society get to choose that anything above a certain profit margin is unacceptable?

Boards of Directors have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders; the shareholders are the owners of a company. I have no problem with that.

Companies take jobs overseas because the taxation and the return on investment are better than they are in the USA. Why have the work done here if it can be done elsewhere at a better value? That's just simple economics. Change the laws and the jobs come back. Make the environment for the jobs more conducive here than there.

Originally Posted by mopek1

People don't get it. He's not even CLOSE to being in the 1% ....

Actually, he probably is and in fact he's probably in the top 25% of the 1% as well.

A few years ago, my wife and I were doing quite well due to her sales position and receiving commission checks quarterly. Due to that influx of monies, we were considered part of the top 1% of earners in the United States. It was only because we made over $300K at the time (2003). I don't know what the threshhold is today, but due to the economy, my assumption is that the number would be similar. I'm also guessing that Moore eclipses that number by a fairly wide margin.

Originally Posted by nation-x

The thing that you and most conservatives miss is that your argument is based on the media narrative that the protests are against ANYONE who might be in the 1%. That is a false narrative... the protest isn't to protest wealth. It is to protest crony capitalism, corporate control of our government and plutocratic fascism.

The "1%" is a metaphoric term for those who fit the plutocratic mold... not to describe only wealthy people. Here is a shocker for you... there are a lot of wealthy people who are supporting the Occupy protests through dollars and physical presence. Michael Moore is only one of those.

The reason conservatives don't like Michael Moore is because he has become successful pointing out their bullshit.

I agree with the first paragraph you state, although I don't believe that the entire OWS movement understands or agrees with the same principle. Just like there are some idiots in the Tea Party, there are some idiots in the OWS (my belief is that OWS represents chaos and anarchy more and therefore has gained a foothold with the college age and youth).

Our politicians are bought off because they allow themselves to be. It's not that big of a stretch to understand that many in the Tea Party represent stepping away from the things you indicate: crony capitalism, corporate control of the gov't, etc. I think the left doesn't like the idea of a smaller central government though, or the idea of cutting back on entitlement programs. I'm not sure however, it's just my opinion.

Michael Moore has become successful during the same timeframe that these evil companies have done what they have done (not all companies became successful by being evil of course). How is it good for the goose but not good for the gander? Political affiliation should not be the marker for determining what success is acceptable and what is not.

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

That said, the right-wing cranks in this thread really are dumbfucks with, as usual, nothing to say. Criticizing him because he's fat? Really? All these years and that's still the best you can do? Yeah, he's fat, which definitely places him among 99% of Americans and 101% of Republican voters.

And he's rich? Where did the myth arise that left wing = poor? Left wing/communist is not about being poor and it never has been. On the contrary it's about making the poorest people better off.

Serious question, why are right-wingers so ridiculously, insanely stupid? I mean it, why?

Michael Moore is fat, which usually means you have enough money to feed yourself at a level where you don't get skinny. That's certainly a level of success. Or maybe he has thyroid problems. Who knows?

I go back to my original point of politicians and individuals that are left wing oriented who want the betterment of society... helping out the poorest individuals. Individually or en masse, the minute they step up to the plate, drop all their deductions, loopholes, etc and deliver their tax liability to the general fund of the good ol US of A, I will accept their premise and think my own manner in dealing with my finances is less worthy than theirs. Until that point, they are just LINO's in disguise. The are politically liberal, but economically conservative.

Warren Buffet standing up and saying.... Hey, I pay less than my secretary!!! Well, that's just political grandstanding.

a- he paid much, much, much more than his secretary did. However, the percentage may have been lower. Albeit, he utilized every deduction and loophole known to man.

b- If he thinks its such a good idea, why doesn't he just pay more? In fact, to be such a good example, why doesn't he pay the percentage taxed by the US on corporations (35%) and then kick in extra because he believes its a good idea? He hasn't and he won't and therefore, why even consider his words as anything more than political blustering?

c- Warren Buffet is in charge of Berkshire Hathaway Holdings: A PUBLIC COMPANY!!!! (trading at +1% as we speak.... WOW $115K per share?? OUCH) He has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders to ensure that it performs as well as possible. There's no way in hell he's going to short the earnings of the company! NONE! ZERO! ZIP! If he were to do it, the share price would drop or tank completely and his financial acumen would be considered garbage. He is succeeding off of the system he is critical of, you can't forget that.

Politically, they say what they say for votes and for nothing more. I want to believe in their ideas and thoughts quite often, but when you attach it to voting and how things really work, they are just full of it as well.

[ManPuppy]

Greedy and Wealthy are different things, as are Douchebags. While Moore may be described as two of the three, I suspect many of the people protesting his involvement with OWS are only one.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Exclusive Photos: Michael Moore?s Massive Michigan Vacation Mansion Beyond 99 Percent?s Wildest Dreams


http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ab...ildest-dreams/

are you joking? it's a large cabin in michigan

and from my understanding from his movies, he grew up in some shit town 'flint' or something? breeder of icbms and teenage killers?

how is that 'beyond the wildest dreams of the 99%?

[flashfire]

that place is nice and all but hardly some huge mansion...1 million bucks? big deal a starter home costs 500k where I live

[DaddyHalbucks]

Originally Posted by nation-x

The thing that you and most conservatives miss is that your argument is based on the media narrative that the protests are against ANYONE who might be in the 1%. That is a false narrative... the protest isn't to protest wealth. It is to protest crony capitalism, corporate control of our government and plutocratic fascism.

The "1%" is a metaphoric term for those who fit the plutocratic mold... not to describe only wealthy people. Here is a shocker for you... there are a lot of wealthy people who are supporting the Occupy protests through dollars and physical presence. Michael Moore is only one of those.

The reason conservatives don't like Michael Moore is because he has become successful pointing out their bullshit.

Maybe it would be better if the unions controlled our government. Wait.. maybe it would be better if government controlled every aspect of our lives from cradle to grave. Wait, maybe it would be great if government and corporations merged, such as with the bailouts and the GM takeover and healthcare and and and, wait, that is the very definition of fascism.. oops.

Fuck it, let's just hate the rich.

[DaddyHalbucks]

The bottom line is Moore and OWS are all lying about the cause of the bad economy.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Maybe it would be better if the unions controlled our government. Wait.. maybe it would be better if government controlled every aspect of our lives from cradle to grave. Wait, maybe it would be great if government and corporations merged, such as with the bailouts and the GM takeover and healthcare and and and, wait, that is the very definition of fascism.. oops.

Fuck it, let's just hate the rich.

sorry, what is the definition of fascism?

[directfiesta]

liberals ( left-wing communist revolutionnary tree hugger hippies ) are all supposed to be on welfare ... according to the rich GOP/teabaggers posting here ...

One for DaddyHalfFuck !

[kane]

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

The bottom line is Moore and OWS are all lying about the cause of the bad economy.

Moore and OWS tend to blame Wall Street and unethical/irresponsible behaviors by them for much of the economic problems that we have.

What would you say is the main the problem?

[Bryan G]

Originally Posted by directfiesta

liberals ( left-wing communist revolutionnary tree hugger hippies ) are all supposed to be on welfare ... according to the rich GOP/teabaggers posting here ...

One for DaddyHalfFuck !

I prefer DaddyhalfWit

dude has some of the most classic posts and replies I've ever seen in my life

[Young]

The Occupy movement is about the douchebags who make millions of dollars manipulating and playing the market (with other peoples money) like a game of Black Jack.

Asshat.

[PornoMonster]

Originally Posted by Young

The Occupy movement is about the douchebags who make millions of dollars manipulating and playing the market (with other peoples money) like a game of Black Jack.

Asshat.

And using it for Political gains! The back Scratch method...

[DaddyHalbucks]

Originally Posted by kane

Moore and OWS tend to blame Wall Street and unethical/irresponsible behaviors by them for much of the economic problems that we have.

What would you say is the main the problem?

If you want a one word answer: socialism

If you want a two word answer: big government

If you want a three word answer: Barack Hussein Obama

[DaddyHalbucks]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

sorry, what is the definition of fascism?

The merger of corporations and government (such as the GM takeover, etc..)

[DaddyHalbucks]

Originally Posted by Bryan G

I prefer DaddyhalfWit

dude has some of the most classic posts and replies I've ever seen in my life

Compared to some of your previous insults, that is mild. If you are trying to improve the tone, I am grateful.

[BlackCrayon]

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Maybe it would be better if the unions controlled our government. Wait.. maybe it would be better if government controlled every aspect of our lives from cradle to grave. Wait, maybe it would be great if government and corporations merged, such as with the bailouts and the GM takeover and healthcare and and and, wait, that is the very definition of fascism.. oops.

Fuck it, let's just hate the rich.

the government should be working for the people, instead they are working for the corporatons who shower them with cash. that is the whole problem! we are no longer a democracy but more of a corpocracy. legislation is mostly passed due to lobbyists, not for the good of the average citizen.

[tony286]

Originally Posted by raymor

Moore has admitted that films are fictional. He's just one more guy making big bucks un the envy and victimhood industry. Just like Al Sharpton and rest making millions vy selling the victimhood excuse. Nothing special.

really where did he admit that?