Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-13-2011, 08:47 PM   #1
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 49,240
A question to photographers about night photography

I have a quick question:

I want to be able to shoot pictures at night without any light other than natural. I am using a Cannon D80. I get so-so results but the amount of "noise" in the image is driving me crazy.

Which method is best for keeping the amount of noise as low as possible:

1. Keeping my ISO high? Or

2. Keeping my ISO as low as possible but keeping my shutter open longer.

Help!
__________________

Custom Coding | Videochat Solutions | Age Verification | IT Help & Support
www.2Much.net
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:53 PM   #2
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
if the subject is still....

you put the camera to auto or 'b'

then you keep the camera on a stand.

then open the lense for different lenghts of time.

its trial and errer to see what gives you best results.
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:54 PM   #3
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulb_(photography)
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:56 PM   #4
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
ps

set the iso as low as the camera can go, and keep the shutter open.
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:12 PM   #5
Lint
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 254
Get a Nikon D3S.
Lint is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:18 PM   #6
Diomed
Converting like it's 1999
 
Diomed's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The South
Posts: 6,167
I have been trying this with video cameras for quite some time now.

Luckily Canon just changed their sensors to shoot better at night. But still doesn't get quite the look I was going for.

You see those incredible shots of the stars without any extra light and they are just as crisp as can be.. must take a lot of money.
__________________
10 years of experience in:

CHAT SALES - PAID TRAFFIC - CONVERSION - CREATIVES - CONSULTATION
Diomed is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:24 PM   #7
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 49,240
Hi -

It's not a video camera, it's a still. And I know how to use the B setting - my question was about the "noise" (random pixels) I get when shooting at night. Will a low ISO but extended open shutter mean lots of night time image detail without the noise?
__________________

Custom Coding | Videochat Solutions | Age Verification | IT Help & Support
www.2Much.net
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:29 PM   #8
SilentKnight
Megan Fox's fluffer
 
SilentKnight's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: shooting pool in Elysium
Posts: 24,818
Lowest iso your can go - and long bulb exposures. Usually a 30-sec exposure on 80-100iso will capture almost anything (still) in very low ambient light. Should go without saying to use either a cable release or shutter remote...and tripod.

Remember to close the viewfinder diopter to avoid stray light coming in from behind the cam.
SilentKnight is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:31 PM   #9
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 49,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight View Post
Lowest iso your can go - and long bulb exposures. Usually a 30-sec exposure on 80-100iso will capture almost anything (still) in very low ambient light. Should go without saying to use either a cable release or shutter remote...and tripod.

Remember to close the viewfinder diopter to avoid stray light coming in from behind the cam.
Cool, thanks for the info. And actually I just ran a test myself and you are right. For night shots always use the lowest possible ISO and keep the shutter open longer. You get much nicer images.
__________________

Custom Coding | Videochat Solutions | Age Verification | IT Help & Support
www.2Much.net

Last edited by 2MuchMark; 11-13-2011 at 09:32 PM..
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 09:44 PM   #10
Pseudonymous
Photographer/Owner
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,661
Use a tripod so that you can use a very slow shutter speed

Nevermind, lol this thread was answered already.
__________________
Previous owner of SoloRevenue
Previous product manager @ Modelcentro.com/MCProfits.com, IsMyGirl.com, SMRevenue.com

Last edited by Pseudonymous; 11-13-2011 at 09:46 PM..
Pseudonymous is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 12:31 AM   #11
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVTimes View Post
if the subject is still....

you put the camera to auto or 'b'

then you keep the camera on a stand.

then open the lense for different lenghts of time.

its trial and errer to see what gives you best results.
I'm with this man. If the subject is moving you get some nice effects.

Try using a light meter as well, less trial and error then.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 01:29 AM   #12
JFK
FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
 
JFK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: FUBARLAND
Posts: 67,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudonymous View Post
Use a tripod so that you can use a very slow shutter speed

Nevermind, lol this thread was answered already.
yup............... tripod is a must
__________________

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com
JFK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 02:36 AM   #13
TheDA
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,665
Canon D80? Not sure I've heard of that. If it's a digi camera your using, there may be an option for long exposure noise reduction somewhere in the menus, this effectively means that a second 'black' exposure is taken after each shot you take and it merges the two images together to eliminate/reduce noise.

This also means that your time between taking shots is increased by 2. If you take a 2 minute exposure, the 'black' exposure the camera takes for you will be 2 mins also.

Something to try and see if it works for you.
TheDA is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.