Web Designers, a Question - GoFuckYourself.com

digitaldivas · 10-12-2011, 05:41 AM

Looking at my visitor stats, i see that only 17 percent of my web traffic is still 1024x768 or lower, while the other 83 percent are looking at my sites in screen resolutions over 1024x768.

Havey ou ever though of making a site with a width of around 1200px? I wonder when this will become the standard?

Fletch XXX · 10-12-2011, 05:43 AM

ive done things in that range, definitely doing more and more 1000+ stuff.

digitaldivas · 10-12-2011, 05:46 AM

yeah it seems like the natural progression of things. I like it!

Fletch XXX · 10-12-2011, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitaldivas

yeah it seems like the natural progression of things. I like it!

yes clients have always wanted to maximize screenspace in designs.

and as someone who has been doing ads for adult marketing campaigns for over 10 years I can say the size of ads have DEFINITELY increased. So if ads are, site width is too.

Kenny B! · 10-12-2011, 06:33 AM

We are in the midst of designing a new preggo site and going with just under 1200 wide.

Time will tell how it goes, should be ready next month

theS2O · 10-12-2011, 06:53 AM

I've done some 1200 width layouts as well. IMO around 990 to 1000px layouts would be a safe size for most screen resolutions.

digitaldivas · 10-12-2011, 06:55 AM

yes i agree, i am going to do my next couple of paysites at maybe 1100 px and see how that goes.

retards · 10-12-2011, 07:04 AM

Stick to 960 wide just in case.

ottopottomouse · 10-12-2011, 09:12 AM

Just because screens are getting larger doesn't necessarily mean people are going to be viewing sites with their browser at full-screen size.

MediaGuy · 10-12-2011, 09:16 AM

We're using 1018px as the basic default width of site containers now.

:D

Jey p · 10-12-2011, 09:22 AM

by default we create them for 1024px , but in your case I would try a higher res

sojproductions · 10-12-2011, 09:36 AM

we always keep them around 990, surprised at the stats with only 17% viewing lower res, it was only about 2.5-3 years ago when it was 65-70% viewing lower.

alexchechs · 10-12-2011, 09:55 AM

I am working on a site for a friend of mine and we are going to a width of 1150 because most of his clients are in the design biz.

Failed · 10-12-2011, 10:14 AM

Do you prefer fixed width over fluid? If so, why?

[ Nate ] · 10-12-2011, 10:18 AM

>>> Sample 1 <<<

>>> Sample 2 <<<

harvey · 10-12-2011, 01:02 PM

adaptive layout

/thread

FlexxAeon · 10-12-2011, 01:09 PM

fluid layouts are the best but all depends on your needs. if you can't go fluid, stay under 1k. folks around 960 will still see the majority. folks at 800, fuck em they must like scrolling sideways

mainstream company i used to work for designed their site ~1000px wide, then wanted to do ad skins on the sides. cause a lot of arguments with advertising clients on shit monitors trying to cheick their campaign

grumpy · 10-12-2011, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitaldivas

Looking at my visitor stats, i see that only 17 percent of my web traffic is still 1024x768 or lower, while the other 83 percent are looking at my sites in screen resolutions over 1024x768.

Havey ou ever though of making a site with a width of around 1200px? I wonder when this will become the standard?

Build this as a test, fits every screen also mobile
http://www.onlypee.com/index_pee.php

All JavaScript

10-12-2011, 05:41 AM	#1
digitaldivas ..I Heart Cannibal Corpse Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: California Posts: 4,328	Web Designers, a Question Looking at my visitor stats, i see that only 17 percent of my web traffic is still 1024x768 or lower, while the other 83 percent are looking at my sites in screen resolutions over 1024x768. Havey ou ever though of making a site with a width of around 1200px? I wonder when this will become the standard? __________________ ...

10-12-2011, 05:43 AM	#2
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	ive done things in that range, definitely doing more and more 1000+ stuff. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

10-12-2011, 05:46 AM	#3
digitaldivas ..I Heart Cannibal Corpse Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: California Posts: 4,328	yeah it seems like the natural progression of things. I like it! __________________ ...

10-12-2011, 06:33 AM	#5
Kenny B! Confirmed Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 5,718	We are in the midst of designing a new preggo site and going with just under 1200 wide. Time will tell how it goes, should be ready next month __________________ Kenny -at- YourPaysitePartner.com Skype: kennyb514 Do business with us: Your Paysite Partner Kenny's Pennies Sticky Dollars Radical Cash Indie Bucks Stand Ahead Read My Ambush Interview Here

10-12-2011, 06:53 AM	#6
theS2O Adult Design Since 2003 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: s2odesigns.com Posts: 4,784	I've done some 1200 width layouts as well. IMO around 990 to 1000px layouts would be a safe size for most screen resolutions. __________________ EMAIL ME at [email protected] for Design Inquiries! \| SKYPE: s2odesigns \| ICQ: 280646555 Adult/Mainstream Website Designs \| Illustrations, Toons & Corporate Logos S2O Designs - Making Awesome Logos & Websites Since 2003!

10-12-2011, 06:55 AM	#7
digitaldivas ..I Heart Cannibal Corpse Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: California Posts: 4,328	yes i agree, i am going to do my next couple of paysites at maybe 1100 px and see how that goes. __________________ ...

10-12-2011, 07:04 AM	#8
retards Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 55	Stick to 960 wide just in case. __________________ Always looking for non adult sponsors !

10-12-2011, 09:12 AM	#9
ottopottomouse She is ugly, bad luck. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 13,177	Just because screens are getting larger doesn't necessarily mean people are going to be viewing sites with their browser at full-screen size. __________________ ↑ see post ↑ 13101

10-12-2011, 09:16 AM	#10
MediaGuy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Montrealquebecanada Posts: 5,500	We're using 1018px as the basic default width of site containers now. :D __________________ YOU Are Industry News! Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB! ICQ: 248843947 Skype: Mediaguy1

10-12-2011, 09:22 AM	#11
Jey p Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ARGENTINA Posts: 1,810	by default we create them for 1024px , but in your case I would try a higher res __________________ Premium Web Design

10-12-2011, 09:36 AM	#12
sojproductions Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,160	we always keep them around 990, surprised at the stats with only 17% viewing lower res, it was only about 2.5-3 years ago when it was 65-70% viewing lower. __________________ ICQ: 404-159-022 Blue Pixels Profits - Uk Solo Tranny sites & Crossdressing! Filthy Profits - Uk MILF Solo Sites

10-12-2011, 09:55 AM	#13
alexchechs Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Location: BROOKLYN!!! Posts: 3,474	I am working on a site for a friend of mine and we are going to a width of 1150 because most of his clients are in the design biz. __________________ Alex Chechs http://thefawnconspiracy.com

10-12-2011, 10:14 AM	#14
Failed Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,301	Do you prefer fixed width over fluid? If so, why?

10-12-2011, 10:18 AM	#15
[ Nate ] Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Asia Posts: 1,468	>>> Sample 1 <<< >>> Sample 2 <<< __________________ Ladyboy Inc. / Asian Money Machine Last edited by [ Nate ]; 10-12-2011 at 10:20 AM..

10-12-2011, 01:02 PM	#16
harvey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 9,266	adaptive layout /thread __________________ This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth

10-12-2011, 01:09 PM	#17
FlexxAeon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,765	fluid layouts are the best but all depends on your needs. if you can't go fluid, stay under 1k. folks around 960 will still see the majority. folks at 800, fuck em they must like scrolling sideways mainstream company i used to work for designed their site ~1000px wide, then wanted to do ad skins on the sides. cause a lot of arguments with advertising clients on shit monitors trying to cheick their campaign __________________ flexx [dot] aeon [at] gmail