The Sponsor's Secret Weapon

[Barry-xlovecam]

Should the illegal tubes sites worry?

In light of what porn.com is doing with licensed content (that of pimproll) there could become a major shift of traffic if other sponsors follow suit.

I see, feel free to correct me, that other sponsors may adopt this model of company owned tube sites that accept affiliate referrals for premium content sales.

Also, advertising revenue gained in selling traffic could be easily used to produce new content regenerating the content pool -- something badly needed in static content porn.

When I was a stone mason we had a saying: "if that rock doesn't give -- use a bigger hammer."

Sponsors may have found the proverbial bigger hammer of their content inventories and with it the solution to the greater problem.

[scottybuzz]

chill out, have a smoke and forget about it.

[WarChild]

Oh for the love of God. Do you have an idea what you've done now? Paul Markham is probably doing is finger warmups as we speak. Prepare for yet ANOTHER thread full of two page postings from Paul.

[CyberHustler]

It's more than just turning your regular paysite into a tube style paysite. You kinda gotta gain porn surfers trust back ( ) while at the same time offering shit that can't be found for free with a simple google search.

[TMM_John]

Why do you indent your posts?

[Barry-xlovecam]

Why do you indent your posts?

1. I like the look
2. Because I can
3. Because it disturbs ( I like disruptive innovation)

[TMM_John]

1. I like the look
2. Because I can
3. Because it disturbs ( I like disruptive innovation)

spıʞ ןooɔ ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝuo ǝq ʎןןɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ uǝɥʇ 'sɹoʇɐןsuɐɹʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝsoɥʇ ɟo ǝuo puıɟ pןnoɥs noʎ

[woj]

spıʞ ןooɔ ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝuo ǝq ʎןןɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ uǝɥʇ 'sɹoʇɐןsuɐɹʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝsoɥʇ ɟo ǝuo puıɟ pןnoɥs noʎ

[Matyko]

spıʞ ןooɔ ǝɥʇ ɟo ǝuo ǝq ʎןןɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ uǝɥʇ 'sɹoʇɐןsuɐɹʇ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝsoɥʇ ɟo ǝuo puıɟ pןnoɥs noʎ

:D

[Barry-xlovecam]

I am glad to see that tubes and their copyright infringement is no longer a real problem and that there will be no more pissing and moaning about this issue from now on ...

Many thanks for your creative responses.

[BareBacked]

Should the illegal tubes sites worry?

In light of what porn.com is doing with licensed content (that of pimproll) there could become a major shift of traffic if other sponsors follow suit.

I see, feel free to correct me, that other sponsors may adopt this model of company owned tube sites that accept affiliate referrals for premium content sales.

Also, advertising revenue gained in selling traffic could be easily used to produce new content regenerating the content pool -- something badly needed in static content porn.

When I was a stone mason we had a saying: "if that rock doesn't give -- use a bigger hammer."

Sponsors may have found the proverbial bigger hammer of their content inventories and with it the solution to the greater problem.

People been doing it for 3+ years. It is nothing new. I do hope porn.com gets a nice chunk of traffic and has a nice content partner program.