![]() |
if the top 100 agreed to switch tomorrow there would be another 100 that would add downloads to their tubes overnight to take over that market. An unfortunate truth.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hmmm, i don't think i get it... Would that stop rippers? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good ideas start to pop up. They should implement it asap! |
Quote:
But most piracy doesn't happen through our real members. So do you go through all that, spend the money, etc... or learn to combat it through cheaper methods that stop the core rips of your sites? |
Anything viewed can be copied. It's a fact of life. People won't care if they have to rip in realtime, a background process can do the job.
|
Quote:
I don't think it would have any impact whatsoever on content being stolen though. Do you? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, it greatly impacts the amount of piracy you have to deal with, but no, it does not fully stop piracy. |
Quote:
Now... start stacking sites together, do you really think pirates are going to sit and wait for a screen record across a 100 sites? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will say, ignoring it does not solve anything or make anyone more money, and the fact is, almost everyone is ignoring it, or rather taking the bitching route, which solves nothing. |
Quote:
Some content owners just seem to don't fucking care. |
Quote:
But you'll have access to more data than me, so I bow to your superior knowledge on this one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you can auto rip an entire site in minutes vs. having to wait for a stream, that's going to slow things down. Stopping piracy 100% isn't possible, but slowing it down to a crawl is. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bump for real biz thread...
|
Some great arguments - and def a ton to think about as a program owner -
More and more it seems like the Hulu/Netlfix route is the best route to go with |
Quote:
Killing multi streams and downloads kills multi-threads, nobody can watch two movies at once anyway, so allowing more than one at a time, is asking to be pirated. Ripping takes processing power, just like it does on your pc. Start stacking them together and see how many you can do at once, even on a unix box, it has limits. Now times that by a few 100,000 porn sites.... it's not just a download anymore, it's a rip, download and trans-code. |
Quote:
|
To further this... IF you were to stream only, what bitrates and stream-types would you offer?
Why not just offer mp4 and stream in 2 diff bitrates.. 514Kbps - for mobile and low connections 2000Kbps+ - for higher bandwidth and future compatibility ? |
users can screen capture streaming video and download it. Wont make a bit of difference
2c |
Quote:
Outside of the crazy stuff, which goes way the heck past what I just explained... I would go with h.263 and your own encoded player to stream them. However, I know very little about that and leave it to the real experts, like Konrad. Biterates on it's own, "personally" I believe the smallest you can get, yet keeping it clear.. my focus is buffer times over super quality. If it takes more than a few seconds to buffer, it's too damn big. :2 cents: |
Quote:
That alone makes a difference. |
Bumping for good info
|
I have nothing to add, except that this is a great thread! We may even be working toward a workable solution in this VERY thread. Awesome.
|
If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123