if they are selling these .xxx domains with the add on that they stop under 18's and process payments, then mabe we should all buty them, then if they do not do as they claim, lets sue the firm for false advertising and selling us somthing that is not true.
For those wishing to avoid adult content .XXX easily allows Internet users to filter out all unwanted .XXX content thanks to its unique MetaCert Tagging system
yipee so even they have set it up to make them more blocable.
you all make that sound like it cannot be done - germany does it since years. and it has a nice side effect: no free HC content on german domains available...
Does this mean you can only have censored tours on .xxx domains?
Originally posted by DVTimes
ICM also will oversee systems that will process payments and verify users are at least 18 years old.
Originally posted by MaDalton
you all make that sound like it cannot be done - germany does it since years. and it has a nice side effect: no free HC content on german domains available...
casting.xxx is showing HC content without any age verification.
How the fuck does xxx hide porn from kids when they can type in anything.xxx and
be guaranteed to find porn?
They don't. It's a marketing ruse to distract from the true intentions of the firm, which is just to make money. If ICM wanted to protect kids, they would have founded .kids, but there is no money in that extension.
I agree. Yet the ICM is telling the media that's exactly what they'll be doing.
Taken from thier website .." A revolutionary new payment system to accompany your current offerings is being developed for launch in 2012. The system will offer micropayment opportunities and will be offered exclusively to .XXX domain owners providing very competitive rates "
Looks like a plan !!
Cams-Tube-Dating Domains Available At Trade Prices !
The whole reason the AVS system goldrush of 97 -2000 imploded is because VISA /MC came out and said you cannot use credit cards as a way to verify someone is over 18.
They went so far as to threaten to close merch accounts if you implied in any text or even hinted that you were using CC's to verify the age of the surfer.
So, if you buy a .xxx domain you have to agree to only use a processor that ICM approves of and give the ICM access to your member database?
Not sure how one leads to the other, but the first part is accurate, I am sure.
Originally posted by BlackCrayon
lol, soon we'll hear that people can't even access free .xxx sites without giving ICM your credit card details to "verify" you...
Good chance.
Originally posted by My Pimp
With the help of credit cards ..like most age verification companies do.
Originally posted by DVTimes
so what if your site is not adult?
Then according to ICM, they could not have the .xxx domain
Originally posted by Rochard
You fucking shit head.
I laughed so hard I spit my damn Pepsi out on my keyboard, monitor, and cell phone. Holy crap that was funny!
Kind of early in the day for soda pop, isn't it?
Originally posted by gleem
The whole reason the AVS system goldrush of 97 -2000 imploded is because VISA /MC came out and said you cannot use credit cards as a way to verify someone is over 18.
They went so far as to threaten to close merch accounts if you implied in any text or even hinted that you were using CC's to verify the age of the surfer.
I don't think visa will allow this again.
Well, while they say you can't verify one is an adult with a credit card, I think the practice shows otherwise.
Not sure how one leads to the other, but the first part is accurate, I am sure.
second part is based on the "verify that members are 18+" part of the statement.
The IFFOR policies include for example:
F. Consent to Monitoring
All registrants in the sTLD must agree to permit automated monitoring of their sites for compliance with IFFOR policies, including without limitation, IFFOR policies requiring site labeling, prohibiting child pornography, and prohibiting content or conduct designed to suggest the presence of child pornography. Registrants must agree not to employ technological or other means to defeat or prevent such monitoring.
So .xxx domain owners are already required to give IFFOR/ICM access to their sites to (for example) check for the presence of cp. They could do something similar to implement their "18+ users" statement...
Verification of 18 year olds is for the purchase of a .xxx domain name. We cannot sell adult domains to minors.
Yes, a micropayment system is in development. No ? there is no requirement to use it. You can use any payment processor that you choose to do business with.
No, buying a .xxx domain doesn?t require relinquishing your database details, nor does it require U/P access to sites.
Meta tagging is done for webmasters, using WC3 POWDER. The labeling technology is all web based, doesn?t require the insertion of code, and is automated beyond adding new .xxx sites to the listing. Parents need to be involved enough to use browser ad ons, etc. Much the same as with .coms.
Verification of 18 year olds is for the purchase of a .xxx domain name. We cannot sell adult domains to minors.
Yes, a micropayment system is in development. No ? there is no requirement to use it. You can use any payment processor that you choose to do business with.
No, buying a .xxx domain doesn?t require relinquishing your database details, nor does it require U/P access to sites.
Meta tagging is done for webmasters, using WC3 POWDER. The labeling technology is all web based, doesn?t require the insertion of code, and is automated beyond adding new .xxx sites to the listing. Parents need to be involved enough to use browser ad ons, etc. Much the same as with .coms.
Did I miss anyone?
Hi, you will be quoted many more times than this. Enjoy the ride.
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
So you're offering a really expensive RTA label that we can get for free on our $9 dot com?
We believe that the technology involved in the labeling, being more current, is much more reliable and we can confidently say that 100% of sites will be labeled.
This is a benefit to consumers. There are many more benefits to a .xxx domain for site owners.
We believe that the technology involved in the labeling, being more current, is much more reliable and we can confidently say that 100% of sites will be labeled.
This is a benefit to consumers. There are many more benefits to a .xxx domain for site owners.
The only way that would matter is if you lobby to make XXX mandatory as any responsible webmasters RTA labels their site, which is respected by all filtering software.
Are you going to lobby to make XXX mandatory? If not, it is a moot point as I would rather label my site once and save $80/yr. per domain or whatever.
No, buying a .xxx domain doesn?t require relinquishing your database details, nor does it require U/P access to sites.
that statement contradicts the "Appendix B IFFOR Baseline Policies ":
F. Consent to Monitoring
All registrants in the sTLD must agree to permit automated monitoring of their sites for compliance with IFFOR policies, including without limitation, IFFOR policies requiring site labeling, prohibiting child pornography, and prohibiting content or conduct designed to suggest the presence of child pornography. Registrants must agree not to employ technological or other means to defeat or prevent such monitoring.
You're saying IFFOR/ICM doesn't require access to password protected areas.
The IFFOR Policies documents say that you do require access to password protected areas.
Or do you not consider "password protection" to be a "means" to limit access to certain content?
If that's the case, there's no way for IFFOR/ICM to monitor an entire site for compliance with IFFOR policies (including the anti cp one) and the ICMs statement about guaranteeing that .xxx domains are free from cp become meaningless.
The only way that would matter is if you lobby to make XXX mandatory as any responsible webmasters RTA labels their site, which is respected by all filtering software.
Are you going to lobby to make XXX mandatory? If not, it is a moot point as I would rather label my site once and save $80/yr. per domain or whatever.
It matters in earning trust from consumers. All .XXX sites are automatically labeled.
No. There has never been any plan to lobby to make .XXX mandatory and regulated.
I can't believe the extreme stupidity in this thread and it explains a lot of why many in the porn biz are having a hard time. Why would it be neccessary to use special tags and coding to label an .xxx domain? THE LABEL IS ALREADY THERE IN THE FORM OF THE XXX EXTENSION!!!! Next step is disabling displaying xxx sites in your browser software if you have kids and I'm sure the browsers will implement this in their first next versions. The whole point is that XXX should have been here in 1996 already. It's 2011 now and later is better than never.
As for the rest of the horror rumors... I didn't see any of all that crap on the ICM site when applying for xxx domains. In fact under the current landrush, they don't require anything, apart from a payment.
The only way that would matter is if you lobby to make XXX mandatory as any responsible webmasters RTA labels their site, which is respected by all filtering software.
Comment