It will be a blowout
Ron Paul will win tonights debate
Collapse
X
-
-
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
If he won, there will still be a MEDIA BLACKOUT
Comment
-
-
-uno
icq: 111-914
CrazyBabe.com - porn art
MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!Comment
-
-uno
icq: 111-914
CrazyBabe.com - porn art
MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!Comment
-
Putting Bachman and Perry in the same room is like making a live horror film, only its not entertaining, its scary and depressing.
Naturally the MSM is barely mentioning Ron Paul if at all once again.
ATTN Webmasters Cruel Bucks - LIVE Gonzo Does Not Pay
------------------------------------------------
Animal Rescue Click Here to Feed An Animal for FreeComment
-
Comment
-
-uno
icq: 111-914
CrazyBabe.com - porn art
MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!Comment
-
-
How is the debate scored? Like 5 points everytime they call Obama a socialist? And 2 points for everytime they say "Obamacare". Maybe 10 points everytime they answer a question on how they would improve things by saying how much Obama sucks instead of actually answering the question. If this was a REAL deabate were the candidates would actually have the balls to go after each other instead of being a Obama hatefest I might watch.Comment
-
The power-elite, for all practical purposes, chooses who the Presidential candidates are. But even if a candidate who is not their ideal choice gets into office, the power-elite makes very clear to them whose boss...
It's not surprise that Obama's administration actions have been very similar to that of Bush and Clinton - political leaders, by and large, are figureheads - it's all about who is pulling the strings / big money interests that counts - until that changes, not much else will.
RonDomagon - Website Management and Domain Name SalesComment
-
Yup, that's exactly right.The power-elite, for all practical purposes, chooses who the Presidential candidates are. But even if a candidate who is not their ideal choice gets into office, the power-elite makes very clear to them whose boss...
It's not surprise that Obama's administration actions have been very similar to that of Bush and Clinton - political leaders, by and large, are figureheads - it's all about who is pulling the strings / big money interests that counts - until that changes, not much else will.
Ron
Take the special interests out of government, or nothing will ever change.Comment
-
Everyone not named Perry needs to be bashing Perry if they want to make headway. The audience already hates Obama. Preaching to choir is not going to help you move up in the polls. Since when is saying "Vote for me, I hate Obama like Perry" going to work?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Most Americans are too dumb to understand things like that, they think it's crazy talk...
They're probably thinking "Oh my God, wtf is he talking about? Our government would NEVER EVER do anything wrong, especially not to hurt us or take our freedoms away."Comment
-
Then why do the rednecks wants all those guns for then?Comment
-
Well at least they get it....
But do you think it's a coincidence that they are labeled as crazy?
Of course not, it's because they don't want the American people to understand the true purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
It's not for hunting lol...
It's a last resort chance to defend yourselves against a government that turns tyrannical and oppressive. (why do you think it includes the right to form a MILITIA?)
Defenseless public = Slaves
"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas JeffersonLast edited by StickyGreen; 09-07-2011, 08:03 PM.Comment
-
Yes your shotgun or dear rifle against a TANK. Good luck with that.Well at least they get it....
But do you think it's a coincidence that they are labeled as crazy?
Of course not, it's because they don't want the American people to understand the true purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
It's not for hunting lol...
It's a last resort chance to defend yourselves against a government that turns tyrannical and oppressive. (why do you think it includes the right to form a MILITIA?)
Defenseless public = Slaves
"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas JeffersonComment
-
Comment
-
Also Gator, how many military men would be willing to actually use that tank to kill his own fellow countrymen? I would hope not many.
Therefore 350 million armed people vs. a tiny army would still be a decent fight... at least they would have 1% chance instead of 0% chance...Comment
-
Romney has a better shot at winning this year than in the past. This year the powers that be were so afraid of Palin that they changed the rules. It used to be the winner of the state gets all the delagates. So many very conservative states fought to get their election date moved up so that they would have more say in the election. So now they have changed the rules and if the primary is held during march will have to divider their delegates proportionally by how the vote went instead of winner take all. This could allow Romney to hang around and still get delegates then later in the cycle once April comes and the primaries go back to winner take all in the more progressive states he could make a run.
In a way that is what McCain did. He won some states, he finished 2nd and 3rd in some states but Huckabee was really giving him a run for his money in the bible belt. He was able to hold out until the race left the bible belt and then he pulled ahead for good. Romney might be able to play that same game.Comment
-
Then you wouldn't need a gun then since no one would be fighting you. Oh and Americans woudn't kill Americans? There was this thing called the Civil War.
310 million and MILIONS are old, cripple or children. So no they won't be fighting. many those that are most of them won't be fighting either. The Civial War the South was basically on the equal terms with the "evil" northern governent. Who won? Any "citizens army" now is no were near the level of our US military. Oh and if our military can't take care of some under gunned rebels then our military sucks. Now does it suck? Nope.Therefore 350 million armed people vs. a tiny army would still be a decent fight... at least they would have 1% chance instead of 0% chance...Comment
-
I never said Americans wouldn't kill Americans, I said "I would hope not many" would. Of course some soldiers are so fucking brainwashed that they would obey any order.Then you wouldn't need a gun then since no one would be fighting you. Oh and Americans woudn't kill Americans? There was this thing called the Civil War.
310 million and MILIONS are old, cripple or children. So no they won't be fighting. many those that are most of them won't be fighting either. The Civial War the South was basically on the equal terms with the "evil" northern governent. Who won? Any "citizens army" now is no were near the level of our US military. Oh and if our military can't take care of some under gunned rebels then our military sucks. Now does it suck? Nope.
You are still dodging the point that being armed is better than not being armed. I'd rather have a chance than be completely helpless.Comment
-
I hope our soldiers obey orders because that's what they are supposed to do.
Your chance=ZERO. I however will be there to fuck your widow.You are still dodging the point that being armed is better than not being armed. I'd rather have a chance than be completely helpless.Comment
-
Comment
-
These polls definitely agree with you...
http://ed.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/0...hts-gop-debate
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...reagan-library
lmfao @ the bar graph in the second link... Romney's bar is same length as Paul's even though they are nowhere close to each other...Comment
-
Obama gets 100 points for his mess on everyone but himself.How is the debate scored? Like 5 points everytime they call Obama a socialist? And 2 points for everytime they say "Obamacare". Maybe 10 points everytime they answer a question on how they would improve things by saying how much Obama sucks instead of actually answering the question. If this was a REAL deabate were the candidates would actually have the balls to go after each other instead of being a Obama hatefest I might watch.
http://www.heraldandnews.com/viewpoi...a_id=103574561
Obama blames Bush for deficits, Feb. 23, 2009, while delivering opening remarks at fiscal responsibility summit, Washington, D.C.
Obama blames Bush for overall standing of American economy, April 19, 2010, at a fundraising reception for Sen. Barbara Boxer.
Obama blames GOP for events that led up to the Gulf oil spill, June 3, 2010, Federal News Service.
Obama blames Bush for deficits, June 8, 2010, at a second fundraising event for Sen. Boxer.
Obama blames Bush for tax cuts, deficits, June 30, 2010, Obama town hall meeting.
Obama blames Bush and Congress for lack of fiscal discipline, April 13, 2011.
Obama blames oil speculators for high oil prices, April 19, 2011, remarks at a town hall meeting.
Obama blames Congress for U.S. debt mess, June 29, 2011, Obama news conference.
Obama blames Republicans for slow pace on immigration reform, July 25, 2011, Obama news conference.
Obama blames messy democracy for his failed policies, Aug. 3, 2011, at a DNC event.
Obama blames Arab Spring and Japan's earthquake for struggling economy and job situation, Aug. 5, 2011, Obama news conference.
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
ICQ # 427013273Comment
-
no. progressives have an odd fascination with ron paul. i dont know why. But MSNBC does not poll republicans, as repubs do not surf there.These polls definitely agree with you...
http://ed.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/0...hts-gop-debate
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...reagan-library
lmfao @ the bar graph in the second link... Romney's bar is same length as Paul's even though they are nowhere close to each other...Last edited by Joshua G; 09-07-2011, 09:00 PM.Comment
-
The dumbest part about all that shit is that it really isn't Bush's fault OR Obama's fault... they are both only ONE MAN.Obama gets 100 points for his mess on everyone but himself.
http://www.heraldandnews.com/viewpoi...a_id=103574561

People give the President way too much blame and way too much credit, whichever the situation calls for.
Presidents are just figurehead frontmen for the most part...Comment

BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

Comment