Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2011, 04:52 PM   #1
Bill8
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,901
6th investigation, this time by the feds and the NDF, clears another "climategate" researcher AGAIN

So, another investigation says there was no misconduct revealed by the stolen East Anglia emails on which the right's "climategate" myth was based.

This time it's the "hockey stick graph" researcher, Michael Mann.

http://www.nsf.gov/oig/search/A09120086.pdf

In this case, the investigation was based on the right's claim that Mann fabricated the data used to create the "hockey stick" graph.

The Inspector General of the National Science Foundation says they found no evidence to support that claim.

Quote:
The research in question was originally completed over 10 years ago. Although the Subject's data is
still available and still the focus of significant critical examination, no direct evidence has been
presented that indicates the Subject fabricated the raw data he used for his research or falsified his
results. Much of the current debate focuses on the viability of the statistical procedures he eniployed,
the statistics used to confirm the accuracy of the results, and the degree to which one specific set of
data impacts the statistical results. These concerns are all appropriate for scientific debate and to
assist the research community in directing future research efforts to improve understanding in this field
of research. Such scientific debate is ongoing but does not, in itself, constitute evidence of research
misconduct.


Lacking any direct evidence of research misconduct, as defined under the NSF Research Misconduct
Regulation, we are closing this investigation with no further action
.
Bill8 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2011, 05:28 PM   #2
Coup
🚨 PBBC International 🚨
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: /👁\
Posts: 9,931
nsf.GOV?

More like FoxesGuardingTheHenHouse.GOV amirite guyz?






(just wanted to say it before anyone else got the chance.)

Last edited by Coup; 08-24-2011 at 05:29 PM..
Coup is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2011, 06:33 PM   #3
sperbonzo
I'd rather be on my boat.
 
sperbonzo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 9,747
So you are saying that an agency that has been directed to have a vested interest in promoting global warming is... Promoting global warming???


Your right, that IS startling news!


Good find!!


.

Last edited by sperbonzo; 08-24-2011 at 06:34 PM..
sperbonzo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.