yes it does look like the pentagon-
look closely at the bottom of the building, the exposed cinder block leading to the upper part and the architecture.
http://i54.tinypic.com/2465das.jpg
now look at that huge pic to the left of the destruction, the part of the building left intact shows the same structure, exposed cinder block etc.
the chain link fence could have been there if they were doing construction and they could have easily extracted it in the large image.
But that image could also be of the part of the building that caught fire but was not directly hit.

Anybody who thinks hitting the world's largest building with a plane, search youtube for "kai tak landing" and then see what you think.

More angles before the upper floors collapsed clearly showing this is the Pentagon:
http://i54.tinypic.com/ka0aqc.jpg
http://i56.tinypic.com/23mu6wi.jpg

Do you see any evidence of a wing, landing gear and an engine crashing into that wall? Shouldn't we see parts of the plane?

The photo again:

http://i54.tinypic.com/2465das.jpg

Yawn. There are dozens of photos of airplane wreckage outside the pentagon.

i placed the photo matt posted in the image i posted and see now it is the corner of the impact area:

http://oi53.tinypic.com/j0ea8m.jpg

but the essence of the picture is misleading, it is clearly not an accurate portrait of the central area of the impact zone.

it`s stupid to even argue this shit.

"but there was wreckage on the lawn."

"no, it is fake. it was placed there."

"their were eyewitnesses."

"no, they just saw a hologram."

pointless ...

Eliminate The Impossible

Amazing we're about to hit the 10 yr "anniversary" of that event. I'm sure everyone remembers where they were when that hit the news. I was on my way to work about to drive to Los Angeles and I said "fuck that, they might attack here" so I called in. Turns out we were all told to stay home. Crazy day.

Looking closer at the image within the image you can see clearly which part of the building it is. the insert photo is then post-impact and it shows that the part of the building which collapsed is still intact at the time of the photo.
http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/1804/pentbldg.jpg

Really the idea of whether or not a plane hit the pentagon is not the issue, but has been made into an issue to further detract from the core issues of the event.

Along with other questions, the idea that 4 planes could go awol for about an hour and NONE of them were intercepted (the one plane downed only because the passengers on board attacked) is highly unlikely, especially considering the target areas.
Yes, other planes had strayed in the past and were not intercepted immediately, but 4 airplanes unchallenged hitting their targets, and extremely sensitive targets at that?

How an awol commercial airplane penetrated pentagon airspace should be the question,
of which there are two answers.

1)through incompetence and negligence the airplane penetrated pentagon airspace and hit the pentagon
2)it was allowed to hit the pentagon

either way its pretty damn bad.

Yes and this is just one of the *many* coincidences and "mistakes" reported that day...

But there are so many of these "coincidences" it's ridiculous...

Not of the wreckage but of the damage after the no-wreckage crash.

And it was reported that all the flights were going over 500 mph before their "crashes"...

That's another huge hole in the official story... all the "incompetence" theories are hard to swallow because there are so many incompetence incidents. And then there's testimony that wasn't issued or covered by the 9/11 commission report of people who knew the plane was headed into the Pentagon..

And then, all the "incompetents" were promoted.

:D

please read and rebut (i know you wont though)

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Payne_Stewart

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Intercept_time

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Stand_Down

as you can see most 9/11 conspiracy truisms are based up deception, omission, lies and fraud ... ironically the same thing you accuse the government of.

sorry they are not in youtube format. you may have to read.

Israel pulled off 9/11. they run the usa govt. pure fascism. israel was created by us german businessmen BEFORE WW2 as a place to control the usa from outside.

anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete idiot.

haha 911 truth is about as bad as snopes.
snopes - a smug douchebag couple from los angeles who have somehow cornered the "truth" market by finding it on the internet;)

the payne stewart story is such a bad example of awol plane interception it's pathetic.

"air traffic controllers in Florida lost touch with a Learjet carrying golfer Payne Stewart and several companions after it left Orlando headed for Dallas, Texas."
wow a golfer heading for dallas,texas...please call out the national guard while your at it.
just a few things-
1)plane not headed into sensitive airspace i.e. THE PENTAGON, WORLD TRADE CENTER.
2)that was one plane, NOT 4. chance of not intercepting one of the 4 is like getting struck by lightning.
3)from the intel the government obviously knew MONTHS before the attack (read FBI- flight school intel) how they were not totally primed and ready for such an attack is beyond belief...

...that is, unless they were absolutely primed and ready. Lihop

Matt, you are correct that is the Pentagon, sorry. :)

.

of course i don't expect you to "get it." you are too brainwashed by your reality tunnel. you could read it and you will just superimpose your belief system on to it. you probably aren't going to read it anyhow so whatever.

back to your point, the Payne Stewart case is used as proof in the stand down theories.

i don't know what you are trying to say? can you dispute any of the arguments in those links?

or maybe the site itself is a black ops, hmmm?

oye vey...why bother quoting my post when you haven't bothered to read it?
once again, and for the last time-
payne stewart -1999 case, poor example because-
1)awol plane not flying into sensitive airspace i.e. THE PENTAGON, WORLD TRADE CENTER
2)not intercepting one plane is possible, not intercepting 4 planes is highly improbable considering the intel the gov had prior to 9/11.

you see, just because a site posts an example of an intercept/standown scenario doesn't make it applicable to all other scenarios. it doesn't make it the truth barometer.

something to consider- the sky is not blue and grass is not green.