| 
		
			
			
				
			
			
				 
			
			
				
			
		 | 
		
			
			
				 
			
				
			
		 | 
	||||
| 
				Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.  You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.  | 
		
		 
		![]()  | 
	
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. | 
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Outside looking in. 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Industry Role:  
				Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: To Hell You Ride 
				
				
					Posts: 14,243
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
	
		
			
			 
				
				9th Circuit Affirms Google Over Perfect 10
			 
			Softcore porn site Perfect 10 may have a knack for photographing naturally beautiful women, but its legal skills are a bit lacking. The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court?s ruling Google did not infringe on Perfect 10?s copyright by displaying thumbnail images of its nude photographs, ruining the online nudie site?s plan to diversify its revenue stream. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	http://allthingsd.com/20110805/judges-give-perfect-10-a-zero-in-google-suit/  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
                 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 It's 42 
			
		
			
			
			Industry Role:  
				Join Date: Jun 2010 
				Location: Global 
				
				
					Posts: 18,083
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		I am going to guess, since there is no link to a PDF of the 9th's ruling, that the Court found, if only in underlying reason by precedent; that the indexing of the content and the the thumbnails was a passive activity in the course of business by Google in acting as a greater "Internet library." (So to be understood in laymen's terms.)  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
                 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Too lazy to set a custom title 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 19,282
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
                 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 ►SouthOfHeaven 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2004 
				Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer 
				
				
					Posts: 28,609
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 when they lost the last one google started making the thumbnails even bigger.. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
	hatisblack at yahoo.com  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
                 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Outside looking in. 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Industry Role:  
				Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: To Hell You Ride 
				
				
					Posts: 14,243
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Haha next will be movies. Wait, bing does that already. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
	 
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
                 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 |