GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Dump the Baggers in 2012! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1032661)

tony286 08-04-2011 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 18331945)
I've been in the business for long enough to know the history, I live in california where it's legal

No you dont. I like you but if you know then you wont admit you know the truth.
As far as LA it being all legal talk to Seymour Butts:
During 2001-02, Glasser was the focus of an obscenity-based court case, People of the State of California v. Adam Glasser, et al. over the depiction of vaginal fisting in his 1999 video Tampa Tushy Fest 1,[2][5] even though the film won the "Best All-Girl Sex Scene - Video" award at the 2000 AVN Awards.[4] Glasser pleaded not guilty to violating California Penal Code Sections 311.2(a), "production, distribution or exhibition of obscene matter"; and 311.5, "advertising or promoting matter represented to be obscene," better known as "pandering obscenity." Then before trial, he reached a plea agreement in which his company pleaded "no contest" to "creating a public nuisance," and paid a $1,000 fine, in exchange for all other obscenity charges being dropped against the defendants.[5]

Vendzilla 08-04-2011 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 18331951)
No you dont. I like you but if you know then you wont admit you know the truth.
As far as LA it being all legal talk to Seymour Butts:
During 2001-02, Glasser was the focus of an obscenity-based court case, People of the State of California v. Adam Glasser, et al. over the depiction of vaginal fisting in his 1999 video Tampa Tushy Fest 1,[2][5] even though the film won the "Best All-Girl Sex Scene - Video" award at the 2000 AVN Awards.[4] Glasser pleaded not guilty to violating California Penal Code Sections 311.2(a), "production, distribution or exhibition of obscene matter"; and 311.5, "advertising or promoting matter represented to be obscene," better known as "pandering obscenity." Then before trial, he reached a plea agreement in which his company pleaded "no contest" to "creating a public nuisance," and paid a $1,000 fine, in exchange for all other obscenity charges being dropped against the defendants.[5]

You know that California is one of two states that porn is legal, while some forms get more attention that others, fisting fits in that catagory that gets noticed by the bible thumpers. I'm sure he laughed when he paid the fine

Joshua G 08-04-2011 04:01 PM

HAHAHA the suggestions the tea party will ban porn. When there is no party position on the topic. When in fact both parties vote en masse for any legislation that bans porn.

Goes to show...when people suggest a tea party position on porn...they are not reflecting any reality, just their own bias, projected onto the tea party.

As do I. I project a tea party that just wants the government to handout wealthy peoples money within the limits collected by taxes. To stop mortgaging the young peoples future to pay for baby boomers as they suck the wealth dry, leaving behind a legacy of debt & despair to their children.

Tea party fights for america.

BFT3K 08-04-2011 08:36 PM

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/val...HEAD_upAss.jpg

Someone should register DumpTheBaggers.com

NetHorse 08-05-2011 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 18331133)
Hi, we hate black people!

We watch Fox Noise, and now we're scared!

You're such a clown. :( Everything that is wrong with this country is in your liberal propaganda that you spread on this forum.

"Hi, I like to pull the race card when anyone disagrees with this administration's policies, I'm an ignorant hypocrite that watches MSNBC".

See, I can sound like I'm 11 too. :1orglaugh

12clicks 08-05-2011 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz (Post 18331848)
well champ, they would be;

1) I am not clueless. I simply hold a different point of view than you. Your assumption that I am clueless because I disagree with you is kind of ....well... ignorant

2) I never said raising taxes would generate a trillion in revenue a year as you implied I had.

Then prove you're not clueless and explain how to solve the problem.

spazlabz 08-05-2011 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18333172)
Then prove you're not clueless and explain how to solve the problem.

First of all, I do not have to prove anything to you and I am generally disinclined to interact with you on boards because you're a troll to anyone who disagrees with you. However, since your response to that answer is so completely predictable, I will humor you with just a few suggestions I would make to my congressman.
  • Eliminate tax loopholes for corporations and multi-millionaires
  • Return the tax rate to the Pre-Bush Levels
  • End the wars and bring back US Service Men
  • Dramatically cut and reform military spending
  • Investigate social programs and eliminate fraud and waste
  • Right now if you earn over 120K (not firm on this number) you do not pay into social security. Change that so that every citizen must pay into it.
  • Regulate big businesses
  • Get rid of subsidies for business that do not need it. Two examples that immediately come to mind are corporate farmers and the oil and gas industry
  • Tax on Gas (just like Dukakis suggested back in the day) and use that revenue to rebuild infrastructure and make more toll roads to help generate states income
  • Investigate, reform and remove fraud from all social programs

Those are just a few of the things I personally would want to see. However, the House of Representatives is probably the only group of people in the country that knows where all of our money is going and I am sure that there are literally thousands of expenditures that can be cut, investigated, reformed and audited that could generate billions in revenues. To list them all here would exceed the maximum character count I am sure. But see that would take work and being a bunch of drama queens is how congress is choosing to act. None of those suggestions are particularly useful for feeding the trolls or suited to sound bites which the public seems to crave.

The bottom line is that you disagree with me, so be it. If I worked hard I could care less but it would take effort. And since I am absolutely convinced, judging from your past behavior, that you will just respond with some arrogant and ignorant, not at all though out 'pithy' reply I am done humoring you. If however you show some maturity and counter-point me with an intelligent reply I would be happy to debate you some more.

tony286 08-05-2011 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18332280)
HAHAHA the suggestions the tea party will ban porn. When there is no party position on the topic. When in fact both parties vote en masse for any legislation that bans porn.

Goes to show...when people suggest a tea party position on porn...they are not reflecting any reality, just their own bias, projected onto the tea party.

As do I. I project a tea party that just wants the government to handout wealthy peoples money within the limits collected by taxes. To stop mortgaging the young peoples future to pay for baby boomers as they suck the wealth dry, leaving behind a legacy of debt & despair to their children.

Tea party fights for america.

Thank you I needed a laugh this morning.Where were you guys when the white guys were spending all that money? Reagan and Bush spent like drunken sailors, no tea party then. Makes you think hmmm.They carry signs saying TEA stands for Taxed Enough Already which is weird when a large number of tea party members pay very little taxes and those who do pay taxes, they have dropped under Obama.
Michelle Bachmann leads the teaparty caucus in the congress and she wants porn banned. Lots of evangelicals involved but dont worry Josh. They take it all and come after porn you can tell them you defended them on a porn board and they will leave you alone.
Learn your history, all the big porn prosecutions happened during Nixon ,Reagan and if 911 didnt happen it would of been Bush also.Dems come in the obsenity task force Bush created Obama dissolved. Most the righties here owe their career because of Gov money that helped develop the net and Janet Reno thinking going after adult porn was a waste of money. Otherwise life would of been very different for those people.

BlackCrayon 08-05-2011 06:10 AM

these tea party flunkies are being taken for a ride. pretty much any movement that gains any kind of following will be infiltrated by corporate interests. its starts out innocently enough with a bit of funding then next thing you know, they are running the show.

what is their solution anyways? spend less...ok, then what?

what i find the most hilarious about these guys is that they are the same people who felt protesting should be illegal, and that protestors should be shot, etc. now they are protesting. i guess protesting is not just for liberal fags after all.

tony286 08-05-2011 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 18333221)
these tea party flunkies are being taken for a ride. pretty much any movement that gains any kind of following will be infiltrated by corporate interests. its starts out innocently enough with a bit of funding then next thing you know, they are running the show.

what is their solution anyways? spend less...ok, then what?

what i find the most hilarious about these guys is that they are the same people who felt protesting should be illegal, and that protestors should be shot, etc. now they are protesting. i guess protesting is not just for liberal fags after all.

good points

12clicks 08-05-2011 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz (Post 18333201)
First of all, I do not have to prove anything to you and I am generally disinclined to interact with you on boards because you're a troll to anyone who disagrees with you. However, since your response to that answer is so completely predictable, I will humor you with just a few suggestions I would make to my congressman.
  • Eliminate tax loopholes for corporations and multi-millionaires
  • Return the tax rate to the Pre-Bush Levels
  • End the wars and bring back US Service Men
  • Dramatically cut and reform military spending
  • Investigate social programs and eliminate fraud and waste
  • Right now if you earn over 120K (not firm on this number) you do not pay into social security. Change that so that every citizen must pay into it.
  • Regulate big businesses
  • Get rid of subsidies for business that do not need it. Two examples that immediately come to mind are corporate farmers and the oil and gas industry
  • Tax on Gas (just like Dukakis suggested back in the day) and use that revenue to rebuild infrastructure and make more toll roads to help generate states income
  • Investigate, reform and remove fraud from all social programs

Those are just a few of the things I personally would want to see. However, the House of Representatives is probably the only group of people in the country that knows where all of our money is going and I am sure that there are literally thousands of expenditures that can be cut, investigated, reformed and audited that could generate billions in revenues. To list them all here would exceed the maximum character count I am sure. But see that would take work and being a bunch of drama queens is how congress is choosing to act. None of those suggestions are particularly useful for feeding the trolls or suited to sound bites which the public seems to crave.

The bottom line is that you disagree with me, so be it. If I worked hard I could care less but it would take effort. And since I am absolutely convinced, judging from your past behavior, that you will just respond with some arrogant and ignorant, not at all though out 'pithy' reply I am done humoring you. If however you show some maturity and counter-point me with an intelligent reply I would be happy to debate you some more.

yeah, I figured you were all about taxing your betters and then throwing a few more taxes on top of that.
You're not just clueless, you're also a southern shitstain looking for your betters to pay your way.
why would you ever expect me to treat you as anything but the trash you are when you start by calling me a troll and finish with more insults.
You're not worthy of intelligent conversation, thats why I treat you as I do.

12clicks 08-05-2011 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 18333221)
these tea party flunkies are being taken for a ride. pretty much any movement that gains any kind of following will be infiltrated by corporate interests. its starts out innocently enough with a bit of funding then next thing you know, they are running the show.

what is their solution anyways? spend less...ok, then what?

what i find the most hilarious about these guys is that they are the same people who felt protesting should be illegal, and that protestors should be shot, etc. now they are protesting. i guess protesting is not just for liberal fags after all.

ah yes, the mighty black crayon has it all figured out. :1orglaugh

what's your solution, spend more? ok, then what?

you see, in the intelligent world, they iIS a tomorrow after you spend less. Eventually when you spend more, it all comes crashing down.

oh, and please run out and find a url backing up your claim that the Tea Party felt protesting should be illegal and protesters should be shot.
I'll wait right here.:1orglaugh

BlackCrayon 08-05-2011 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18333362)
ah yes, the mighty black crayon has it all figured out. :1orglaugh

what's your solution, spend more? ok, then what?

you see, in the intelligent world, they iIS a tomorrow after you spend less. Eventually when you spend more, it all comes crashing down.

oh, and please run out and find a url backing up your claim that the Tea Party felt protesting should be illegal and protesters should be shot.
I'll wait right here.:1orglaugh

I am all for spending less but in the right places. The fact is no politicians want to spend less. This is their business, their career and its all backed by your money. They will try to romantisize any movement that gains momentum, simply for votes but at the end of the day, its business as usual.

spazlabz 08-05-2011 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18333357)
yeah, I figured you were all about taxing your betters and then throwing a few more taxes on top of that.
You're not just clueless, you're also a southern shitstain looking for your betters to pay your way.
why would you ever expect me to treat you as anything but the trash you are when you start by calling me a troll and finish with more insults.
You're not worthy of intelligent conversation, thats why I treat you as I do.

whatever helps you sleep at night sweetie :winkwink:

BFT3K 08-05-2011 09:33 AM

http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscart...s/ktun160l.jpg

Barry-xlovecam 08-05-2011 10:22 AM

"The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor."
— Voltaire

BFT3K 08-05-2011 01:36 PM

CBS/NY Times poll: The more you get to know the tea party, the more you dislike them

http://FetishSoup.com/GFY/BowelMovement2.jpg

The percentage of people with an unfavorable view of the Tea Party in a New York Times/CBS News Poll this week was higher than it has been since the first time the question was asked, in April 2010. Forty percent of those polled this week characterized their view as ?not favorable,? compared with 18 percent in the first poll.

Joshua G 08-05-2011 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 18334333)
CBS/NY Times poll: The more you get to know the tea party, the more you dislike them

http://FetishSoup.com/GFY/BowelMovement2.jpg

The percentage of people with an unfavorable view of the Tea Party in a New York Times/CBS News Poll this week was higher than it has been since the first time the question was asked, in April 2010. Forty percent of those polled this week characterized their view as ?not favorable,? compared with 18 percent in the first poll.

HAHA you blast fox news & call their viewers retards...& look at you attacking the tea party with polls from sources as slanted as fox.

Next november, tea party takes control of republicans. Then it takes control of america 2016 when obamacare forces the uninsured into the jaws of the sharks.

gleem 08-05-2011 08:37 PM

Finally a 3rd party political movement has some influence.

Finally America's political system is evolving.

Any other mature democracy has at least 3 parties that can be elected to power...


We at a min have 4: Loony Liberals, Democraps, Repubican, and Tea Baggers.

That would balance shit out a bit.

BFT3K 08-05-2011 11:19 PM

US Credit Downgrade?

Thanks again douche bags!

http://FetishSoup.com/GFY/GOPBlowUp.jpg

BFT3K 08-05-2011 11:33 PM



https://youtube.com/watch?v=QD2cKdZYwjA

Barry-xlovecam 08-05-2011 11:33 PM

They (the teabaggers) are not sure if they won the battle but they have opened the can of worms that may be their own undoing ...

‘Optimism index’ suggests recession is here

Playing with hand-grenades can be dangerous to your health.

Monday may be the opening salvo of the fruition of the "double dip" Great Recession II ...

Friday was just a "dead cat bounce" it looks like.



BFT3K 08-06-2011 09:33 AM

http://brendancalling.com/wordpress/...4/teabag13.jpg

NetHorse 08-06-2011 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 18334495)
HAHA you blast fox news & call their viewers retards...& look at you attacking the tea party with polls from sources as slanted as fox.

Next november, tea party takes control of republicans. Then it takes control of america 2016 when obamacare forces the uninsured into the jaws of the sharks.

Bingo, it's pathetic. What a joke. :)

NetHorse 08-06-2011 02:37 PM

http://afrocityblog.files.wordpress....rance_wins.jpg


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123