The Party of "NO" is Destroying America

lol ...ha.

This is why I said you were an ignorant ...

After Clinton, it was Bush Jr ( Dubya, theShrub .. ) , not Bush 1.

Bush 1 dealt with Iraq after it ' invaded' Kuwait...

Bush Jr just invaded a country because god told him to ...


Get your ' facts ' straight .... mainly since you are an American ...

Are you posting from a group home for the developmentally disabled or what? All i said was "Bush" you fucking idiot. Everyone can figure out which being that its quite obvious given the context of the remarks and who was President when Iraq invaded Kuwait,... well, everyone can figure it out except you apparently, who requires the added details and specificity because you're too fucking dumb and too eager to make fun of others for any and every reason.

Funny when a retard can't wait to call people a retard. Stop projecting and start working on your own self improvement.

what a spin... You basically indicted that Bush 2 had to go in Iraq because he jusat invaded Kuwait...

Spin as you wish, same shit comes out :

same gvuy hgad to deal with Iraq invading kuwait and also deal at the same time with the .com bubble ... or is it Bush senior that had to deal with the .com bubble - like in back to the future ... ) ...

Well, once a "Populace People Party" emerges as a viable option, let me know.

In the meantime we only have a 2 party system...

One side answers to the richest 2% of the country, while bamboozling the rest of their racist sheep through propaganda, and the other side actually gives a shit about the country as a whole.

Wow.... You really do live in a fantasy kool aid world don't you?


I didn't realize how much, but..... wow. You are a lost cause.


I hope for your sake that someday you wake up from dreamland...and that it's not too rude of an awakening.



.


.

The "rude awakening" you speak of, is on the way, and believe me, there won't be any winners.

Look moron. This is simple. I am going to try to slow it down for you since you clearly have no clue what I was saying or the person I was addressing was for that matter.

1) Guy remarks that there was a surplus because Clinton is awesome
2) He adds to that the fact that Bush had a deficit
3) I point out the .com boom had nothing to do with Clinton
4) I point out that the .com crash had nothing to do with Bush
5) I point out the fact that military actions also added to the spending following the Clinton presidency

... then YOU go off on all sorts of bizarre tangents about Bush Jr, me confusing Bush sr/jr because i'm dumb... and you're making no fucking sense at all because you skimmed what was wrote, made some wrong assumptions and then pounced like a retarded lion attacking a rock as if its a side of beef.

I was not commenting on invading Iraq dipshit. I was commenting on DEALING WITH IRAQ because they had invaded Kuwait. Again, any fucking moron knew I was talking about Sr. and the events at that time... except you.

Do you got it? Do you need a diagram or any learning aids? I hate to see someone struggle like this and embarrass themselves in front of the class... but at the same time, maybe its what you need to help you pull your head out of your ass.

It's funny because only on an internet forum do you have people that claim to be enlightened and that everyone else are sheep. The delusions are brilliant.

Words cannot properly describe the "stupid" that you are.

So how was the night shift at the golden arches?

just one thing its not the government run media its the corporate owned and run media.Fewer corporations own more of the media they control the message.

You have a point but I think most of both sides are in their pocket. What is screamed liberal now is really republican light.And I love how people are saying this is Obama's fault when he is the first president ever to not get a clean raise the debt ceiling bill.

Too true. Just ask Cenk Uygur

A free and neutral internet can play a huge roll in diluting and diminishing the strangle hold that media companies have on us.

An independent site can gain as much, or more popularity, than ANY "news" show on ANY network, if it relates well to it's viewers, and is marketed properly.

The question is, how long before that scenario is cut down by corporate owned bandwidth control, or until a larger media company simply buys out the independent site?

For now, we still have the freedom to voice our thoughts and concerns freely across the web, so don't squander the opportunity - take advantage of it before it is too late!

When I have an absolute moron in all facets if life, I know I have proven my point