the real danger of draconian copyright protection

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gideongallery
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2003
    • 7082

    #101
    Originally posted by AmeliaG
    Yes, we are going to end up with draconian and unreasonable laws because a handful of thieves decided to profit on the backs of artists and other productive people, while giving nothing in return. Yes, your are right, the folks stealing will most likely ruin the exchange of ideas for everyone.
    that not guarrenteed

    congress didn't give in to the mpaa when they demanded that they tarriff the vcr

    enough people wanted that right to stay around (timeshifting) that the congress had no choice but to let it be.

    responses like the one i showed you are blow back from trying to push draconian laws instead of figuiring out the economic solution to the problem.

    it more likely that all filesharing for personal use will become fair use.

    funny part is if you actually used a fair use friendly approach the current laws are actually too strong.

    “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

    Comment

    • TheDoc
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jul 2001
      • 13827

      #102
      Originally posted by gideongallery
      seriously you don't even recognize the sources for your own quotes

      go back to the wiki article

      click on the footnote link for the quote you were trying to use to justify arguing that the supreme court was wrong.

      see where it leads you too.

      Soooo... you you call my source wrong then use a source from mine to make your argument? Brilliant.....


      Even though we aren't talking about patents, which may never be a monopoly, I'll go with it anyway.


      Here, your article says: "Just because an inventor has been granted a patent does not mean that there will be a market for the patent product, and without a market there can be no monopoly."

      And part of my quote said: "a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market"


      Looks like it was correct after all... looks like the courts did agree with the wiki article I shared. And you're still using the term incorrectly.
      ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
      It's all disambiguation

      Comment

      • gideongallery
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2003
        • 7082

        #103
        Originally posted by TheDoc
        Soooo... you you call my source wrong then use a source from mine to make your argument? Brilliant.....


        Even though we aren't talking about patents, which may never be a monopoly, I'll go with it anyway.


        Here, your article says: "Just because an inventor has been granted a patent does not mean that there will be a market for the patent product, and without a market there can be no monopoly."

        And part of my quote said: "a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market"


        Looks like it was correct after all... looks like the courts did agree with the wiki article I shared. And you're still using the term incorrectly.
        no moron i was pointing out the bias of the quote

        the courts define a copyright/patent a "limited monopoly" for the cases they hear
        this biased lawyer is deliberately ignoring scope to make his bullshit arguement

        he is saying it can't be a monopoly at all because if you patent a crappy invention that no one would ever want you have no monopoly control.

        but if you patent a crappy invention that no one would ever want, there not going to be anyone ripping it off either

        therefore there would not be any infringement

        therefore the courts could not /would not be involved.

        the situation he is using to justify disqualifying the court declaration CAN"T exist for anything the courts would be involved in.

        “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

        Comment

        • GatorB
          The Demon & 12clicks
          • Oct 2001
          • 18208

          #104
          Originally posted by gideongallery
          idiot being pro fair use is not against copyright
          Do you even know what "fair use" and "copyright" actually are? So far I have failed to see ANY indication that you do.

          maybe you should actually listen to what i am saying instead of making up your own interpretation of what i am saying.
          I don't need to keep hearing you rant that 2+2=5 when I damn well know it equals 4. You just want free shit without paying.

          copyright law as it is now is pefectly fine, it doesn't need to be fixed.
          If you think the 95 year copyright doesn't violate the US Constitution you are even more stupid.

          Article 1 Section 8

          To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

          Ok in what fucking world is 95 years even remotely defined as "limited"?

          Comment

          • TheDoc
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jul 2001
            • 13827

            #105
            Originally posted by gideongallery
            no moron i was pointing out the bias of the quote

            the courts define a copyright/patent a "limited monopoly" for the cases they hear
            this biased lawyer is deliberately ignoring scope to make his bullshit arguement

            he is saying it can't be a monopoly at all because if you patent a crappy invention that no one would ever want you have no monopoly control.

            but if you patent a crappy invention that no one would ever want, there not going to be anyone ripping it off either

            therefore there would not be any infringement

            therefore the courts could not /would not be involved.

            the situation he is using to justify disqualifying the court declaration CAN"T exist for anything the courts would be involved in.
            Hahaha... you and your lame ass twists of stupidity. Amazing you can twist my quote, from a lawyer, that is wrong in your eyes, and you using your source, which says the same thing, and now means something totally different to you.
            ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
            It's all disambiguation

            Comment

            • gideongallery
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2003
              • 7082

              #106
              Originally posted by GatorB
              Do you even know what "fair use" and "copyright" actually are? So far I have failed to see ANY indication that you do.



              I don't need to keep hearing you rant that 2+2=5 when I damn well know it equals 4. You just want free shit without paying.



              If you think the 95 year copyright doesn't violate the US Constitution you are even more stupid.

              Article 1 Section 8

              To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

              Ok in what fucking world is 95 years even remotely defined as "limited"?
              you realize that your arguement about the time being TOO LONG is the opposite direction that everyone else is arguing

              However if fair use was applied to the level i am talking about

              if commentaries like this is the coolest dance routine was protected

              if timeshifting/backup/recovery/format shifting is totally technology agnostic

              then i don't have a problem with 95 years

              there enough access thru just fair use to be balanced

              although i would agree it should not be raised again 95 years is the upper limit.

              “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

              Comment

              • gideongallery
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2003
                • 7082

                #107
                Originally posted by TheDoc
                Hahaha... you and your lame ass twists of stupidity. Amazing you can twist my quote, from a lawyer, that is wrong in your eyes, and you using your source, which says the same thing, and now means something totally different to you.
                you do realize that saying the source is bias is NOT using the source it arguing AGAINST the source.

                I flat out said he was wrong

                btw he is also wrong on another point because he ignores patent trolling like what arcadia did to this industry

                a crap patent not worth the paper it printed (no market) got millions of dollars in liciencing fees because the cost of fighting it was too expensive.

                It completely discredits his patents can't be a monopoly without a market because even a bogus patent with no real usefulness got money from people to afraid to fight.

                thats super bad ass monopoly power, even the misrepresentation of a marketplace is enough to get money for what was a worthless piece of paper.

                “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                Comment

                • TheDoc
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jul 2001
                  • 13827

                  #108
                  Originally posted by gideongallery
                  you do realize that saying the source is bias is NOT using the source it arguing AGAINST the source.

                  I flat out said he was wrong

                  btw he is also wrong on another point because he ignores patent trolling like what arcadia did to this industry

                  a crap patent not worth the paper it printed (no market) got millions of dollars in liciencing fees because the cost of fighting it was too expensive.

                  It completely discredits his patents can't be a monopoly without a market because even a bogus patent with no real usefulness got money from people to afraid to fight.

                  thats super bad ass monopoly power, even the misrepresentation of a marketplace is enough to get money for what was a worthless piece of paper.
                  Hahahaha.... AGAIN, your source said THE EXACT SAME THING - Almost word for word - yet mine is wrong..

                  I really don't care about your other dribble.
                  ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                  It's all disambiguation

                  Comment

                  • gideongallery
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 7082

                    #109
                    Originally posted by TheDoc
                    Hahahaha.... AGAIN, your source said THE EXACT SAME THING - Almost word for word - yet mine is wrong..

                    I really don't care about your other dribble.
                    1. there was no source just a counter arguement
                    2. it said the exact opposite

                    "Just because an inventor has been granted a patent does not mean that there will be a market for the patent product, and without a market there can be no monopoly."
                    yet i pointed out that Acacia made millions from their worthless patent

                    none of the people who licience thought it was valid

                    they paid the money because it cost too much money to fight

                    that a real world example that proves you don't need a market for monopoly pricing to occur

                    a worthless patent with no market whatsoever was licienced to people for millions

                    “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                    Comment

                    • GatorB
                      The Demon & 12clicks
                      • Oct 2001
                      • 18208

                      #110
                      Originally posted by gideongallery
                      you realize that your arguement about the time being TOO LONG is the opposite direction that everyone else is arguing
                      Nobody has disagreed with what I said.

                      You seem to think everything is fair use. That's the issue. You don't want to seem to acknowledge that copyright holders have the right to dictate how their content is used. You may not agree with their decisions but it's their content.

                      Your bullshit how torrents are the same thing as a DVR. Well guess what get a fucking DVR and you won't have to torrent or watch the motherfucking show when it's on. Or guess what most cable/satellite have ON Demand. So you can catch-up on shows you've missed. Then there sites like Hulu. Torrents are for freeloaders than don't want to pay for shit beause they work at Burger King and live at home with mom in her trailer.

                      Comment

                      • GatorB
                        The Demon & 12clicks
                        • Oct 2001
                        • 18208

                        #111
                        Originally posted by gideongallery
                        1. there was no source just a counter arguement
                        2. it said the exact opposite



                        yet i pointed out that Acacia made millions from their worthless patent

                        none of the people who licience thought it was valid

                        they paid the money because it cost too much money to fight

                        that a real world example that proves you don't need a market for monopoly pricing to occur

                        a worthless patent with no market whatsoever was licienced to people for millions
                        That was a patent issue not copyright idiot. And Congress is passing patent reform to prevent shit like that.

                        Comment

                        • gideongallery
                          Confirmed User
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 7082

                          #112
                          pretty good for a patent that had no market (because it was totally bogus)

                          Originally posted by Lensman
                          Playboy Enterprises has reached an agreement with Acacia to exempt it from any patent claims in the future. Additionally, Playboy is requiring Acacia to exempt all of its affiliates from patent claims, as long as it directly related to the promotion of Playboy products. The affiliate provision was a major sticking point for Playboy, and considerably delayed the agreement.

                          Webmaster programs that have previously reached an agreement with Acacia include TopBucks, TrafficCashGold, PlatinumBucks, CECash, FlyntDigital, and more.

                          Agreement Reached: PlayboyCash webmasters are not liable to Acacia for patents.

                          “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                          Comment

                          • gideongallery
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 7082

                            #113
                            Originally posted by GatorB
                            That was a patent issue not copyright idiot. And Congress is passing patent reform to prevent shit like that.

                            except the doc was using that PATENT article to argue that the supreme court declaration that copyright is a "limited monoploy" is wrong


                            The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.
                            http://gfy.com/showthread.php?p=18275153#post18275153

                            “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                            Comment

                            • TheDoc
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jul 2001
                              • 13827

                              #114
                              Originally posted by gideongallery
                              1. there was no source just a counter arguement
                              2. it said the exact opposite



                              yet i pointed out that Acacia made millions from their worthless patent

                              none of the people who licience thought it was valid

                              they paid the money because it cost too much money to fight

                              that a real world example that proves you don't need a market for monopoly pricing to occur

                              a worthless patent with no market whatsoever was licienced to people for millions
                              Here's what you don't seem to understand.... idiot.

                              The only person talking this topic twist, is you... first because you've twisted it so far off what was actually being talked about, it's just pathetic. Then secondly, because this actual topic you're discussing right now, is exactly what I said, what was quoted/shared and you're refuting with... exactly what was said anyway.

                              Dude... I don't know of you smoke pot, crack, or maybe you drink. But I suggest you clean up, your brain is in backwards.
                              ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                              It's all disambiguation

                              Comment

                              • gideongallery
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 7082

                                #115
                                Originally posted by TheDoc
                                Here's what you don't seem to understand.... idiot.

                                The only person talking this topic twist, is you... first because you've twisted it so far off what was actually being talked about, it's just pathetic. Then secondly, because this actual topic you're discussing right now, is exactly what I said, what was quoted/shared and you're refuting with... exactly what was said anyway.

                                Dude... I don't know of you smoke pot, crack, or maybe you drink. But I suggest you clean up, your brain is in backwards.
                                i quoted a copyright case (betamax case ) to point out they supreme court declared copyright to be a monopoly 20 times.

                                you quoted from wikipedia about patents to argue that my copyright is a monopoly statement.

                                you were the one who moved off copyright to patent.

                                I just proved that it was totally wrong two ways

                                1. by proving that no infringement could occur in a no market situation
                                2. proving that even when no one wants or even believes that the patent is valid people will licience it to avoid the court cost


                                if you want to parallel that back to copyright it not that hard

                                ask all the people who simply paid the settlement cost even though they didn't download anything just because it cost more to fight then to settle.

                                ie the dead guy who was sent a demand letter because his ip address downloaded copyright material after he was dead. (open wifi in dead guys apartment)

                                “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                Comment

                                • gideongallery
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2003
                                  • 7082

                                  #116
                                  Originally posted by TheDoc
                                  Then secondly, because this actual topic you're discussing right now, is exactly what I said, what was quoted/shared and you're refuting with... exactly what was said anyway.

                                  Dude... I don't know of you smoke pot, crack, or maybe you drink. But I suggest you clean up, your brain is in backwards.
                                  seriously how can you not see that it actually the exact opposite


                                  intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.

                                  i gave you an example of a patent with NO MARKET(because no one believed it was valid) and got people to pay millons of dollars for something that was worth nothing (higher then competitive prices).

                                  seriously that the exact opposite

                                  your quote says it can't be done

                                  i just gave you an example of how it WAS done.

                                  “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                  Comment

                                  • TheDoc
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Jul 2001
                                    • 13827

                                    #117
                                    Originally posted by gideongallery
                                    i quoted a copyright case (betamax case ) to point out they supreme court declared copyright to be a monopoly 20 times.

                                    you quoted from wikipedia about patents to argue that my copyright is a monopoly statement.

                                    you were the one who moved off copyright to patent.

                                    I just proved that it was totally wrong two ways

                                    1. by proving that no infringement could occur in a no market situation
                                    2. proving that even when no one wants or even believes that the patent is valid people will licience it to avoid the court cost


                                    if you want to parallel that back to copyright it not that hard

                                    ask all the people who simply paid the settlement cost even though they didn't download anything just because it cost more to fight then to settle.

                                    ie the dead guy who was sent a demand letter because his ip address downloaded copyright material after he was dead. (open wifi in dead guys apartment)
                                    What a load of shit.... betamax now? My wiki title about monopolies? Your brain is fried man.... lay off the drugs.
                                    ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                    It's all disambiguation

                                    Comment

                                    • TheDoc
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Jul 2001
                                      • 13827

                                      #118
                                      Originally posted by gideongallery
                                      seriously how can you not see that it actually the exact opposite





                                      i gave you an example of a patent with NO MARKET(because no one believed it was valid) and got people to pay millons of dollars for something that was worth nothing (higher then competitive prices).

                                      seriously that the exact opposite

                                      your quote says it can't be done

                                      i just gave you an example of how it WAS done.

                                      Drugs.... lay off them.
                                      ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                      It's all disambiguation

                                      Comment

                                      • gideongallery
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2003
                                        • 7082

                                        #119
                                        Originally posted by TheDoc
                                        What a load of shit.... betamax now? My wiki title about monopolies? Your brain is fried man.... lay off the drugs.
                                        exact quotes doc

                                        Originally posted by gideongallery
                                        the supreme court explictly declared copyright to be a monopoly 20 times in the betamax case

                                        you might want to look at the case before you try and argue that copyright is not a monopoly.

                                        http://supreme.justia.com/us/464/417/case.html

                                        Originally posted by TheDoc
                                        gideongallery.... the shit just keeps spewing from you.

                                        The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.

                                        Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelle...poly_privilege
                                        nuff said

                                        “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                        Comment

                                        • TheDoc
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Jul 2001
                                          • 13827

                                          #120
                                          Originally posted by gideongallery
                                          exact quotes doc






                                          nuff said
                                          Wow... so you're talking to VGeorgie about Betamax and that jumps to our conversion?

                                          You really will twist shit to stupid ways... Truly, lay off the drugs.
                                          ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                          It's all disambiguation

                                          Comment

                                          • gideongallery
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Aug 2003
                                            • 7082

                                            #121
                                            Originally posted by TheDoc
                                            Wow... so you're talking to VGeorgie about Betamax and that jumps to our conversion?

                                            You really will twist shit to stupid ways... Truly, lay off the drugs.
                                            no you jumped into that conversation


                                            Vgeorgie said

                                            While the term "monopoly" is sometimes used to describe the rights holder's ability to restrict republication, the term is biased because the rights holder is the natural and bona fide legal owner of any creative output. There isn't a "monopoly" for any government to give, because governments can't give rights that are inalienable in the first place, only observe them.
                                            i responded with
                                            the supreme court explictly declared copyright to be a monopoly 20 times in the betamax case

                                            you might want to look at the case before you try and argue that copyright is not a monopoly [conferred by the government].

                                            "The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors."

                                            http://supreme.justia.com/us/464/417/case.html
                                            you jumped in to try and backup VGeorgie with

                                            gideongallery.... the shit just keeps spewing from you.

                                            The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.

                                            Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelle...poly_privilege
                                            sorry man but i think your projecting your own drug problem on me

                                            i actually remember the conversation thread
                                            Last edited by gideongallery; 07-12-2011, 07:06 AM. Reason: error in the original quote missed 4 words that were relevent to the quoted paragraph from case

                                            “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                            Comment

                                            • magicmike
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Feb 2003
                                              • 2384

                                              #122
                                              Why do people waste their time arguing with Gideon idiot still, his pro piracy leanings will have no effect on copyright laws that are coming.

                                              The US economy is still pretty shitty, and the lost jobs and tax dollars that are disappearing because of copyright issues will trump anything else.
                                              Just Porno with both classic and mobile porn versions.
                                              Gay Porn Our mega gay site tranny porn

                                              Comment

                                              • Serge Litehead
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Dec 2002
                                                • 5190

                                                #123
                                                Gideon doesn't see a problem with piracy and torrents in particular
                                                Gideon doesn't produce anything on his own

                                                which basically means he is useless troll who is arguing for the sake of arguing.

                                                he knows damn well is if calls his cable company and asks if he can backup all his favorite cable shows on torrents they are not going to be happy about it, because it will allow anyone else without subscription to see these shows which goes far away from fair use that he is trying to defend. that's the issue he conveniently ignores that there is no FAIR USE associated with piracy.

                                                Comment

                                                • TheDoc
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Jul 2001
                                                  • 13827

                                                  #124
                                                  Originally posted by gideongallery
                                                  no you jumped into that conversation


                                                  Vgeorgie said



                                                  i responded with


                                                  you jumped in to try and backup VGeorgie with



                                                  sorry man but i think your projecting your own drug problem on me

                                                  i actually remember the conversation thread
                                                  Actually... my reply was based on OUR conversion, my first reply to you in this thread pointed out that you "twist a meaning to your own benefit" - which you also talked about monopolies in.

                                                  And just like my reply back with the wiki, with the point to show you're spewing more bullshit, to twist the bullshit to your own meanings. Which.... you then proceeded to argue with the same thing it says. After that point it's just your dumb ass trying to twist in new shit to prove some point nobody gives a shit about.

                                                  That's the off topic, stupid twist, you took... that's what I pointed out in my first reply, other replies, and above.

                                                  Damn you're thick.
                                                  Last edited by TheDoc; 07-12-2011, 08:20 AM.
                                                  ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                                  It's all disambiguation

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Agent 488
                                                    Registered User
                                                    • Feb 2006
                                                    • 22511

                                                    #125
                                                    you have no idea how fair use actually is defined - both in dictionary and legal senses - and that is the foundation of your whole theory, thus it is pointless debating your structurally flawed theory.

                                                    a waste of time.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Serge Litehead
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Dec 2002
                                                      • 5190

                                                      #126
                                                      hey Agent, welcome back! BTC didn't crash like you predicted with mtgox being hacked a while ago ;)

                                                      Comment

                                                      • VGeorgie
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Nov 2008
                                                        • 359

                                                        #127
                                                        Originally posted by gideongallery
                                                        copyright is the exclusive right granted to the creator by section 106 of copyright act.

                                                        other laws like the DMCA etc are not a copyright, they are the laws that govern the inforcement of a copyright.
                                                        You understand little of what you write. I deal with copyright every day.

                                                        No government can confer the rights of ownership to a creative work. It is a natural, inalienable right. They can only confer a protection for copyright, and provide for civil and criminal penalties for infringers. You fail, or do not wish, to understand this simple premise.

                                                        When a court or any other legal body uses the term "monopoly" they do so in a framework that assumes those reading the decisions understand the use of terms. You don't, so you use a broad general-purpose dictionary definition; that is, as a coercive or stifling limitation. It's clear to any reasonable person reading a judgment of the court that for copyright their intention is to describe an exclusivity benefiting the public in a way that encourages ongoing creative output.

                                                        Your misunderstanding of copyright is only second to a complete failure to grasp the fair use doctrine. You believe copyright establishes what is and what isn't fair use. It doesn't. As a legal doctrine it comes from case law and precedent. Until clear cut fair use is established for a VERY SPECIFIC CASE, you cannot claim it, and anything else is infringement. You want to be judge and jury, conjuring extraneous legal conclusions to whatever poorly educated argument you wish to make.

                                                        Finally, in the interests of your education, or lack thereof, DMCA is a copyright law, enacted in response to WIPO treaty, and *amends* Title 17. It's all the same law, so don't be stupid. DMCA further criminalizes the circumvention of anti-copy processes.
                                                        Last edited by VGeorgie; 07-12-2011, 09:34 AM.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • gideongallery
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Aug 2003
                                                          • 7082

                                                          #128
                                                          Originally posted by TheDoc
                                                          Actually... my reply was based on OUR conversion, my first reply to you in this thread pointed out that you "twist a meaning to your own benefit" - which you also talked about monopolies in.

                                                          And just like my reply back with the wiki, with the point to show you're spewing more bullshit, to twist the bullshit to your own meanings. Which.... you then proceeded to argue with the same thing it says. After that point it's just your dumb ass trying to twist in new shit to prove some point nobody gives a shit about.

                                                          That's the off topic, stupid twist, you took... that's what I pointed out in my first reply, other replies, and above.

                                                          Damn you're thick.
                                                          so producing a concrete example that explictly proves your wiki reference is wrong is BS

                                                          lol

                                                          you do realize that a circular proof right

                                                          your arguement is bs because i disagree with it
                                                          i present an arguement
                                                          you present a concrete example that proves my arguement false
                                                          but because you are disagreeing with my completely false arguement your proof is bs.

                                                          “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                          Comment

                                                          • gideongallery
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Aug 2003
                                                            • 7082

                                                            #129
                                                            Originally posted by VGeorgie
                                                            You understand little of what you write. I deal with copyright every day.

                                                            No government can confer the rights of ownership to a creative work. It is a natural, inalienable right. They can only confer a protection for copyright, and provide for civil and criminal penalties for infringers. You fail, or do not wish, to understand this simple premise.

                                                            When a court or any other legal body uses the term "monopoly" they do so in a framework that assumes those reading the decisions understand the use of terms. You don't, so you use a broad general-purpose dictionary definition; that is, as a coercive or stifling limitation. It's clear to any reasonable person reading a judgment of the court that for copyright their intention is to describe an exclusivity benefiting the public in a way that encourages ongoing creative output.

                                                            Your misunderstanding of copyright is only second to a complete failure to grasp the fair use doctrine. You believe copyright establishes what is and what isn't fair use. It doesn't. As a legal doctrine it comes from case law and precedent. Until clear cut fair use is established for a VERY SPECIFIC CASE, you cannot claim it, and anything else is infringement. You want to be judge and jury, conjuring extraneous legal conclusions to whatever poorly educated argument you wish to make.

                                                            Finally, in the interests of your education, or lack thereof, DMCA is a copyright law, enacted in response to WIPO treaty, and *amends* Title 17. It's all the same law, so don't be stupid. DMCA further criminalizes the circumvention of anti-copy processes.
                                                            seriously you really need to hire a better lawyer

                                                            your confusing the right to free speech with the monopoly control of the copyright act

                                                            section 106 of the act does not recognize an already established control, it GIVES IT

                                                            it limits it with a subject to clause (fair use included)

                                                            section 107 defines explictly a collection fair use and DEFINES the rules that court must use to establish new fair uses.

                                                            ONCE estabished those fair use exist they are not a case by case issue.

                                                            PVR did not have to back into court to re-establish the timeshifting right all over again.

                                                            IF they apply may be but in those cases copyright holder must make a compelling arguement against it

                                                            see cablevision vs 20th century fox lower court decision

                                                            when that "compelling arguement" is invalidated by the appeal court and the supreme court one more limit (public transmission) disappears for all arguement against fair use.

                                                            “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Redrob
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Oct 2004
                                                              • 4791

                                                              #130
                                                              Currently, illegally streaming a copyrighted piece of audio or video is a misdemeanor punishable by a year in jail. The proposed bill, however, would make illegal streaming a felony punishable by up to five years in jail.
                                                              Link to Article.

                                                              Join the others on the Group W bench.........

                                                              Comment

                                                              • marlboroack
                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                • Jul 2010
                                                                • 9327

                                                                #131
                                                                I just read every single post on this thread and really have nothing to say to this!

                                                                Comment

                                                                • gideongallery
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Aug 2003
                                                                  • 7082

                                                                  #132
                                                                  Originally posted by Redrob
                                                                  Link to Article.

                                                                  Join the others on the Group W bench.........
                                                                  you do realize your linking to an article driving people to sign a petition against thw bill right


                                                                  it sort of funny given your hopes this bill will pass

                                                                  “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Robbie
                                                                    Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                                                    • Aug 2002
                                                                    • 20960

                                                                    #133
                                                                    Why doesn't Eric ban this piece of shit? He is not in our business. He has never contributed ONE business thread EVER. The guys at PussyCash say he's never sent a sale. WHY is he on a business board? To piss people off and have them leave for the xbiz board (where he is NOT allowed)?
                                                                    -Robbie
                                                                    ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • PiracyPitbull
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Jan 2011
                                                                      • 583

                                                                      #134
                                                                      Stop feeding the troll.....seriously
                                                                      http://www.piracypitbull.com

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • gideongallery
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Aug 2003
                                                                        • 7082

                                                                        #135
                                                                        Originally posted by Robbie
                                                                        Why doesn't Eric ban this piece of shit? He is not in our business. He has never contributed ONE business thread EVER. The guys at PussyCash say he's never sent a sale. WHY is he on a business board? To piss people off and have them leave for the xbiz board (where he is NOT allowed)?
                                                                        want to bet

                                                                        if i have sent them a sale you put all your content into the public domain

                                                                        if i have not i leave forever.
                                                                        Last edited by gideongallery; 07-12-2011, 01:11 PM.

                                                                        “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Serge Litehead
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Dec 2002
                                                                          • 5190

                                                                          #136
                                                                          Originally posted by gideongallery
                                                                          want to bet

                                                                          if i have sent them a sale you put all your content into the public domain

                                                                          if i have not i leave forever.
                                                                          did you make PussyCash to put some content in public domain before you sent a sale their way? isn't your strategy? =)

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • gideongallery
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Aug 2003
                                                                            • 7082

                                                                            #137
                                                                            Originally posted by holograph
                                                                            did you make PussyCash to put some content in public domain before you sent a sale their way? isn't your strategy? =)
                                                                            sent pass tense

                                                                            If i send a sale now i lose the bet

                                                                            just giving robbie what he wants (assuming he is telling the truth)

                                                                            of course if he is a lying sack of shit he will never take that bet.
                                                                            Last edited by gideongallery; 07-12-2011, 01:25 PM.

                                                                            “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Serge Litehead
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Dec 2002
                                                                              • 5190

                                                                              #138
                                                                              dude, you are too wrapped up in your mind.. you can't even get and answer simple/joking question. i did not ask anything about your stupid bet offer.

                                                                              reread what I wrote, or you are completely lost case. no offence

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • gideongallery
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Aug 2003
                                                                                • 7082

                                                                                #139
                                                                                Originally posted by holograph
                                                                                dude, you are too wrapped up in your mind.. you can't even get and answer simple/joking question. i did not ask anything about your stupid bet offer.

                                                                                reread what I wrote, or you are completely lost case. no offence
                                                                                did you make PussyCash to put some content in public domain before you sent a sale their way? isn't your strategy? =)
                                                                                you might want to rephrase the question then because it make no sense.

                                                                                “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • Serge Litehead
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                                                  • 5190

                                                                                  #140
                                                                                  it makes a very good sense given your posting history on GFY with demands of people to put their content in public domain if you get to do business with them.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • gideongallery
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Aug 2003
                                                                                    • 7082

                                                                                    #141
                                                                                    Originally posted by holograph
                                                                                    it makes a very good sense given your posting history on GFY with demands of people to put their content in public domain if you get to do business with them.
                                                                                    i could demand a million dollars but then i would have to attempt to collect

                                                                                    given the dmca wording and an acceptance of the bet

                                                                                    everyone in the world would be able to post his shit everywhere and point to that acceptance as proof they thought the work was public domain.

                                                                                    as a counter notice to the takedown it would be an automatic win.


                                                                                    no fight, no trying to get the money.

                                                                                    it a perfect bet since i could simply take his content and never worry about copyright infringement issues.

                                                                                    “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Robbie
                                                                                      Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                                                                      • Aug 2002
                                                                                      • 20960

                                                                                      #142
                                                                                      Again...Eric why is this guy here? Are you deliberately trying to piss off the few remaining people?
                                                                                      He's not in this business and he's never contributed to the community in any way at all. Just endless pro-piracy trolling.

                                                                                      He has nothing to offer anyone here (or anywhere else from what I can tell of his character). If I wanted to talk to pro-piracy surfers who live with their mommy and daddy I would talk to high school boys.
                                                                                      -Robbie
                                                                                      ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • gideongallery
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Aug 2003
                                                                                        • 7082

                                                                                        #143
                                                                                        Originally posted by Robbie
                                                                                        Again...Eric why is this guy here? Are you deliberately trying to piss off the few remaining people?
                                                                                        He's not in this business and he's never contributed to the community in any way at all. Just endless pro-piracy trolling.

                                                                                        He has nothing to offer anyone here (or anywhere else from what I can tell of his character). If I wanted to talk to pro-piracy surfers who live with their mommy and daddy I would talk to high school boys.
                                                                                        really your crying to eric when you can get rid of me by simply accepting the bet

                                                                                        “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • CrkMStanz
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Jan 2008
                                                                                          • 517

                                                                                          #144
                                                                                          Originally posted by DamianJ
                                                                                          The thing none of you get, is he is just a troll. He comes here for one reason. To wind people up about copyright and piracy.

                                                                                          And he is BRILLIANT at winding you all up.

                                                                                          We all know he's not in porn, and is nobody.

                                                                                          We all know he is just trolling.

                                                                                          We all know he comes here for attention.

                                                                                          And you idiots keep giving it to him.

                                                                                          If everyone ignored him for two weeks he'd never come back. And yes, I'd put money on that.


                                                                                          I'm going with this one

                                                                                          (dammit, this is going to cut my postcount by ~96%)

                                                                                          this shall be my last response to giddyboy

                                                                                          If you are a troll then - Well Trolled! you stayed perfectly in character for a long time now - for fooling me

                                                                                          If you are not a troll - then... well, I am sad for you - in sooo many ways - and because... well, just because

                                                                                          and for good measure


                                                                                          .



                                                                                          *************************
                                                                                          @robbie - maybe Eric IS the troll ... should think about that.
                                                                                          (please don't ban me!!!)



                                                                                          .
                                                                                          Last edited by CrkMStanz; 07-12-2011, 02:59 PM.
                                                                                          believe me - without free porn, just as many people will seek porn out on the Internet, and many more will pay if there is no free alternative, its not like sex is a fad - it can be milked much like any renewable resource - long term

                                                                                          i wasn't born with enough middle fingers - Marilyn Manson

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • billywatson
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                                                            • 3281

                                                                                            #145
                                                                                            As producers of media, we create "files" from nothing, with costs being incurred. As producers, we own these files -- same as a baker owns the cookies he just made.

                                                                                            When people don't pay for our files (I don't give a fuck what you call it -- "file sharing" or "pirating" or whatever) it's stealing.

                                                                                            Having an employee stand outside of the cookie store handing out free cookie samples is one thing; having millions of people replicate and distribute our product without paying a thing for them is what's gonna put us all out of business.

                                                                                            I Shoot Porn.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • gideongallery
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Aug 2003
                                                                                              • 7082

                                                                                              #146
                                                                                              Originally posted by billywatson
                                                                                              As producers of media, we create "files" from nothing, with costs being incurred. As producers, we own these files -- same as a baker owns the cookies he just made.

                                                                                              When people don't pay for our files (I don't give a fuck what you call it -- "file sharing" or "pirating" or whatever) it's stealing.

                                                                                              Having an employee stand outside of the cookie store handing out free cookie samples is one thing; having millions of people replicate and distribute our product without paying a thing for them is what's gonna put us all out of business.
                                                                                              you realize that the guy buying the baker's cookie can do whatever he wants to do with that cookie after he bought

                                                                                              If he wants to use the cookie to discover the recipe and make millions of copies he can

                                                                                              copyright don't follow normal property rights so you should stop using property right terms to define infringement (stealing).

                                                                                              because the action your describing would not be considered stealing in your analogy.

                                                                                              “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Zorgman
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Aug 2002
                                                                                                • 6103

                                                                                                #147
                                                                                                When producers stop making work I would love to hear what they fucking say then.
                                                                                                Maybe someone should take bank records because it's "INFORMATION" too.
                                                                                                ---

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • gideongallery
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Aug 2003
                                                                                                  • 7082

                                                                                                  #148
                                                                                                  Originally posted by Zorgman
                                                                                                  When producers stop making work I would love to hear what they fucking say then.
                                                                                                  Maybe someone should take bank records because it's "INFORMATION" too.
                                                                                                  more people are producing more content every day

                                                                                                  the every day joes are producing shit now and posting it on youtube

                                                                                                  the we have to stop piracy because it going to kill all content production arguement is total bullshit arguement

                                                                                                  you have 95 years to make back your production cost, you don't have to fuck over fair uses to do it in 1 month.

                                                                                                  “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • TheDoc
                                                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                    • Jul 2001
                                                                                                    • 13827

                                                                                                    #149
                                                                                                    What's up with all the trolling the troll posts... you guys trollin or what?
                                                                                                    ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                                                                                    It's all disambiguation

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • gideongallery
                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                      • Aug 2003
                                                                                                      • 7082

                                                                                                      #150
                                                                                                      Originally posted by TheDoc
                                                                                                      What's up with all the trolling the troll posts... you guys trollin or what?
                                                                                                      yeah i know especially given the fact that all robbie has to do to get rid of me

                                                                                                      want to bet

                                                                                                      if i have sent them a sale you put all your content into the public domain

                                                                                                      if i have not i leave forever.
                                                                                                      it not like he is a lying sack of shit or something.

                                                                                                      “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...