LOL! Not Guilty on all counts!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Internet User
    So Fucking Banned
    • May 2011
    • 544

    #1

    LOL! Not Guilty on all counts!

  • stolder
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2006
    • 120

    #2
    I think there is gunna be riots now...
    Contact me here...

    ICQ - 274033664
    Skype - newbegin2010


    or send me an email

    customer.care.desk08 at gmail

    Comment

    • Internet User
      So Fucking Banned
      • May 2011
      • 544

      #3
      i would eat Casey Anthony's ass

      Comment

      • The Demon
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2003
        • 7336

        #4
        That's a retarded jury over there. The prosecution had no basis for first degree murder but not guilty on the lesser charges? Big fat lol.
        Greed is Good

        Comment

        • Topbuxom Lea
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2004
          • 1313

          #5
          JUST OMFG....

          that Jury is fucking INSANE. How retarded do you have to be????
          Lea
          Marketing Miglet
          ICQ: 263003699
          Topbucks/Pluginfeeds


          Twitter:
          @porntechgeek
          @TopBucksmobile
          @pinkvisual

          Facebook:

          http://www.facebook.com/imalespectrum

          Comment

          • Holly Lez!
            She's back
            • Oct 2003
            • 3480

            #6
            Fucking sad.. no justice for Caylee
            [email protected]
            Skype: hollyruprecht

            Comment

            • Alprazolam
              So Fucking Banned
              • Aug 2005
              • 864

              #7
              not on all counts.

              she was found guilty of lots of stuff.

              lying to the cops. providing false statements. she is not guilty of murder.

              the rest she is guilty.

              Comment

              • bronco67
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Dec 2006
                • 29032

                #8
                If the glove does not fit, you must acquit.

                Comment

                • stolder
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 120

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Alprazolam
                  not on all counts.

                  she was found guilty of lots of stuff.

                  lying to the cops. providing false statements. she is not guilty of murder.

                  the rest she is guilty.

                  BIG FUCKING DEAL!

                  SHE GETS LIKE 1 YRS THATS IT...

                  she may just get timed served and walk on thrusday...


                  I bet someone will off her lol
                  Contact me here...

                  ICQ - 274033664
                  Skype - newbegin2010


                  or send me an email

                  customer.care.desk08 at gmail

                  Comment

                  • Internet User
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • May 2011
                    • 544

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Alprazolam
                    not on all counts.

                    she was found guilty of lots of stuff.

                    lying to the cops. providing false statements.

                    she will walk

                    Comment

                    • Tom_PM
                      Porn Meister
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 16443

                      #11
                      She should get time served, she's been in prison for 3 yrs+ right? Yikes.
                      43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

                      Comment

                      • L-Pink
                        working on my tan
                        • Mar 2005
                        • 39151

                        #12
                        She was guilty, the government just didn't prove it.

                        .

                        Comment

                        • Jakez
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 5656

                          #13
                          ^This

                          8char
                          [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                          Killuminati

                          Comment

                          • GatorB
                            The Demon & 12clicks
                            • Oct 2001
                            • 18208

                            #14
                            Originally posted by The Demon
                            That's a retarded jury over there. The prosecution had no basis for first degree murder but not guilty on the lesser charges? Big fat lol.
                            The jury folowed the US constituion. You just said the prosecution didn't have a case but the jury is retraded for not convicting anyways? You must hate America because you hate the US Constitution.

                            Comment

                            • CDSmith
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • May 2001
                              • 51460

                              #15
                              She'll get out thursday, just in time to party like a rockstar this weekend.

                              What a celebration it will be.
                              Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                              ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

                              Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
                              ICQ me at: 31024634

                              Comment

                              • GatorB
                                The Demon & 12clicks
                                • Oct 2001
                                • 18208

                                #16
                                Originally posted by L-Pink
                                She was guilty, the government just didn't prove it.

                                .
                                Didn't you know that were supposed to convict on "probably guilty" or "I THINK she did it"? Appearantly we got rid of that part of the constitution that says innocent before proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

                                Comment

                                • Seth Manson
                                  Please dont fuck animals
                                  • Jul 2010
                                  • 3988

                                  #17
                                  I guess all of you saying she was guilty of murder know more about the case than the jury does.

                                  Comment

                                  • AdultKing
                                    Raise Your Weapon
                                    • Jun 2003
                                    • 15601

                                    #18
                                    The nature of the Jury system is that it's up to jurors to decide on guilt beyond *any* reasonable doubt. The jury must make the decision after sitting through all of the evidence presented to it after countless hours in court. Sometimes juries will get it wrong but I'd much prefer to live with the Jury system than the alternative.

                                    Comment

                                    • DaddyHalbucks
                                      A freakin' legend!
                                      • Feb 2004
                                      • 18975

                                      #19
                                      ..and no one will be held accountable for the death of adorable toddler Caylee, who was duct taped, murdered, stuffed in a garbage bag, and left to rot in a local swamp/ "wooded area."

                                      Boner Money

                                      Comment

                                      • Dead
                                        They left the door open
                                        • Apr 2003
                                        • 4755

                                        #20
                                        Justice is blind.....because if she could see the things her scales have passed, she would slit her own throat!

                                        Comment

                                        • GatorB
                                          The Demon & 12clicks
                                          • Oct 2001
                                          • 18208

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Dead
                                          Justice is blind.....because if she could see the things her scales have passed, she would slit her own throat!
                                          you=dumb

                                          Comment

                                          • Tempest
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • May 2004
                                            • 10217

                                            #22
                                            Is this one of those instances where if she had been up for 2nd degree murder, manslaughter or something like that, that the jury probably would have convicted but because it was 1st degree they just couldn't bring themselves to do it?

                                            Comment

                                            • TCLGirls
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Feb 2010
                                              • 3068

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Tempest
                                              Is this one of those instances where if she had been up for 2nd degree murder, manslaughter or something like that, that the jury probably would have convicted but because it was 1st degree they just couldn't bring themselves to do it?
                                              Well since the jury also acquitted her on manslaughter, then i guess they would have also acquitted her on murder 2 or any lesser degree of murder as well.

                                              Comment

                                              • porno jew
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Nov 2006
                                                • 10166

                                                #24
                                                don't worry, you have no attention span anyways. there will be a new fake moral outrage tomorrow to distract you from the fact you spend your whole lives toiling to pay for bombs banks and jails.

                                                Comment

                                                • SmokeyTheBear
                                                  ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                  • Jun 2004
                                                  • 28609

                                                  #25
                                                  "beyond reasonable doubt" get's cloudier and cloudier.

                                                  In this day and age almost anything is within reason.. because so many fucked up things happen.

                                                  It isn't impossible to imagine that the mom was a basket case shitty liar mom but that someone else killed her daughter.. because shit like that happens everyday.

                                                  In civil cases it is preponderance of the evidence not beyond reasonable doubt , thats why o.j. was found guilty in civil, in a civil case your side just has to have more evidence in favor than the other side to get a guilty verdict.

                                                  I wonder if anyone can sue her for murder in civil court ?
                                                  hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                  Comment

                                                  • TCLGirls
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Feb 2010
                                                    • 3068

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                    "beyond reasonable doubt" get's cloudier and cloudier.

                                                    In this day and age almost anything is within reason.. because so many fucked up things happen.

                                                    It isn't impossible to imagine that the mom was a basket case shitty liar mom but that someone else killed her daughter.. because shit like that happens everyday.

                                                    In civil cases it is preponderance of the evidence not beyond reasonable doubt , thats why o.j. was found guilty in civil, in a civil case your side just has to have more evidence in favor than the other side to get a guilty verdict.

                                                    I wonder if anyone can sue her for murder in civil court ?

                                                    The only people that can sue Casey Anthony for "wrongful death" in a civil suit are people that have a direct interest in the toddler. That would be the dad (who is dead), or the grandparents George and Cindy. Highly unlikely that George and Cindy are going to sue their own daughter, who doesn't have any assets anyhow.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • SmokeyTheBear
                                                      ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                      • Jun 2004
                                                      • 28609

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                      The only people that can sue Casey Anthony for "wrongful death" in a civil suit are people that have a direct interest in the toddler. That would be the dad (who is dead), or the grandparents George and Cindy. Highly unlikely that George and Cindy are going to sue their own daughter, who doesn't have any assets anyhow.
                                                      not dissing your answer but don't alot of people have direct interest in her ?

                                                      not sure why it would be so insane for her father to sue her, didn't she say he molested the granddaughter and basically that he killed her or something ?

                                                      I'm sure she will be floating in cash after a few interviews.

                                                      but back to "direct interest" i wonder what that means in legal terms..? would brother or sister count? cousins ? aunts ?
                                                      hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                      Comment

                                                      • GatorB
                                                        The Demon & 12clicks
                                                        • Oct 2001
                                                        • 18208

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks
                                                        ..and no one will be held accountable for the death of adorable toddler Caylee, who was duct taped, murdered, stuffed in a garbage bag, and left to rot in a local swamp/ "wooded area."

                                                        You can prove all this? Because the DA and ME couldn't.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Mamassita
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Nov 2009
                                                          • 252

                                                          #29
                                                          She Chloroformed the kid so the child would sleep all night long when she couldnt find a baby sitter, so she could go clubin and dancing.

                                                          Over did it one night, called dad first, he being the ex-cop/ detective and having knowledge where chloroform could not be detected after 30 days told her to hide the body for 30 days and to keep her mouth shut, dont say a word to know one and to live her life like normal so she rode around with the childs body in the trunk till it started to stink from decomp, then bagged her up and disposed of it like trash.

                                                          They should all be convicted of a crime the whole lot of them.

                                                          But since the system is flawed she walks.
                                                          Last edited by Mamassita; 07-05-2011, 11:51 PM.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • GatorB
                                                            The Demon & 12clicks
                                                            • Oct 2001
                                                            • 18208

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Tempest
                                                            Is this one of those instances where if she had been up for 2nd degree murder, manslaughter or something like that, that the jury probably would have convicted but because it was 1st degree they just couldn't bring themselves to do it?
                                                            Wrong. There wasn't any proof Anthony killed her kid. Accidental or otherwise. Do I think she had something to do with her kid's death. PROBABLY. In the US juries are not supposed to convict that someone "probably" did it. Do you know why we have people that get released form prison after 10, 15, 20 years after it was found out they didn't actually do the crime. Because 12 dumb morons who had no proof thought the guy "probably" did it and convicted him because that's what everyone wanted.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • TCLGirls
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Feb 2010
                                                              • 3068

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                              not dissing your answer but don't alot of people have direct interest in her ?

                                                              not sure why it would be so insane for her father to sue her, didn't she say he molested the granddaughter and basically that he killed her or something ?

                                                              I'm sure she will be floating in cash after a few interviews.

                                                              but back to "direct interest" i wonder what that means in legal terms..? would brother or sister count? cousins ? aunts ?
                                                              "Direct Interest" means someone who had custody of the child or took care of the child. That rules out the dad because he's dead. That rules out the brother unless he can prove he took care of the child. The only people that can sue for wrongful death against Casey are the grandparents Cindy and George because it seems like they did in fact take care of the child. And like I said before, what's the use of suing someone who has no assets? It's a waste of time any money.

                                                              As for Casey rolling around in cash, that's unlikely because from what I hear, attorney Baez has all the book and film rights. He got that in return for representing Casey for free or lowered fee.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Black All Through
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Oct 2010
                                                                • 2078

                                                                #32
                                                                No matter how guilty she may be, the law is the law and if they can't come up with something that proves her guilt beyond reasonable doubt then she walks. The law was applied by the letter.

                                                                It will catch up with her, she'll end up like OJ
                                                                I want to buy contextual links on quality blogs
                                                                For both Adult and mainstream niche - Small to massive packages

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Girenr
                                                                  Registered User
                                                                  • Jun 2011
                                                                  • 29

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Whether it looks like she did it or not doesn't matter. What matters is what you can prove.

                                                                  There was no evidence saying she killed anyone.

                                                                  There was no murder weapon.

                                                                  There was no DNA saying she murdered anyone.

                                                                  They didn't even know how the kid died.

                                                                  You can't send someone to prison or to death with 0 evidence. The jury got it 100% right based on the evidence.

                                                                  Plenty of innocent black men have walked out of prisons after 20 years because of jury's who convict on 0 evidence.

                                                                  I'd never date her though.. I'd be scared I'd end up in the woods in a bag somewhere. =x
                                                                  Last edited by Girenr; 07-06-2011, 02:38 AM.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Girenr
                                                                    Registered User
                                                                    • Jun 2011
                                                                    • 29

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by TCLGirls

                                                                    As for Casey rolling around in cash, that's unlikely because from what I hear, attorney Baez has all the book and film rights. He got that in return for representing Casey for free or lowered fee.
                                                                    smart guy

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Dead
                                                                      They left the door open
                                                                      • Apr 2003
                                                                      • 4755

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                      you=dumb
                                                                      Damn man....you know, that hurts coming from someone of your caliber????

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      Working...