NALEM owner Alex requests takedown of parody image!

[alias]

The image in question:


The email:

Hi Niall,

This is Alex. You know better than to modify our image and post it online.

http://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18238597&postcount=4

Lets keep this very simple, and have you kill the image immediately.
Agreed?

Sincerely,

Alex Richards, Director

NALEM.COM

What would Jesus do?

[SmokeyTheBear]

jesus would explain parody can be fair use of a copyright image

[charlie g]

The black jesus would say fuck you mothafucka.

The gay jesus would invite him for a mange e toi with sally rand.






.

[AdultKing]

NALEM. What a wanker. sheesh.

Jesus says FUCK YOU NALEM!

[Jman]

I just love it ;-)

[V_RocKs]

So many good things to quote I don't know which one to pick!

[_Richard_]

haha that picture is perfect

[Phoenix]

how does jay manage to look fairly dignified while giving the finger to no one in particular?..lol

[Just Alex]

Post more. What else can you do with it?

[Coup]

you got nalemed

[NALEM]

Alias, things have a way of working themselves out.


Here is Mike B showing off his latest ... Payout Magazine

[Anthony]

NALEM before deciding to get in bed with .XXX had a tenth of my interest with their pics.

NALEM can now go fuck themselves. Seriously get off the board Fucktard, you aren't wanted here.

[SleazyDream]

not sure I understand, Nalem.com is upset cause someone stamped the word 'poser' on a picture of Jay and posted it in a thread???? a thread with less then 50 replies to it..... I laughed, I cried, I moved on and never looked at the thread again.

Now I can understand if it's someone who makes 200 posts a day, has over 10,000 posts and puts that image in his avatar so everyone in every unrelated thread posted in reads it.... but one posting in a thread with almost no exposure....

and I thought I was a pissy little girl for my freakouts.... jesus... this makes it look like you need to crack me over the head with a baseball bat before I respond in retrospect...

[InfoGuy]

Jesus would tell Alex that parody is protected by the 1st Amendment and to bend over and take it in the ass, like he did when he took ICM Registry / .XXX's dirty money.

[InfoGuy]

Now I can understand if it's someone who makes 200 posts a day, has over 10,000 posts and puts that image in his avatar so everyone in every unrelated thread posted in reads it....

It would sure be funny if everyone replaced their baddog avatars with one of these.

[NALEM]

jesus would explain parody can be fair use of a copyright image

[babymaker]

Why don't any of these pic companies take time to actually name the fucking people in the pix lol none of them do, so it's just a bunch of pix of fat losers unless you already know them. What's the point.

[baddog]

Why don't any of these pic companies take time to actually name the fucking people in the pix lol none of them do, so it's just a bunch of pix of fat losers unless you already know them. What's the point.

I allow people to be tagged if they want. Only my mainstream blog has anyone take me up on the offer.

[JFK]

I allow people to be tagged if they want. Only my mainstream blog has anyone take me up on the offer.

FUBAR had the same for years, some people just prefer to remain anonymus

[babymaker]

Strange would think the people would want their names with their pix, esspecially if they are successful, even if ugly as dogshit lol :D

[ManuteBol]

Who took these photos? Buster or Mike?

[Vendzilla]

I allow people to be tagged if they want. Only my mainstream blog has anyone take me up on the offer.

FUBAR had the same for years, some people just prefer to remain anonymus

They keep showing up on facebook LOL

[L-Pink]

jesus would explain parody can be fair use of a copyright image

jesus and gudieon would explain parody can be fair use of a copyright image

I fixed the second one for you.

.

[LAJ]

how does jay manage to look fairly dignified while giving the finger to no one in particular?..lol

Gotta be a combo of the glasses, hair and expression? I'm pretty flattered thats making the rounds.

If it ends up on a t-shirt and I start making royalties... well then I have arrived.

[Lace]

This message is hidden because NALEM is on your ignore list.

[Gabriel]

NALEM before deciding to get in bed with .XXX had a tenth of my interest with their pics.

NALEM can now go fuck themselves. Seriously get off the board Fucktard, you aren't wanted here.

Tell us how you really feel...

[BradBangs]

Should say LOSER not POSER.

[Anthony]

Tell us how you really feel...

I haven't seen my therapist this month.

[SleazyDream]

It would sure be funny if everyone replaced their baddog avatars with one of these.

woops..... foot meet mouth....


sorry.




wait, no I'm not!

[jimmy-3-way]

Gotta be a combo of the glasses, hair and expression? I'm pretty flattered thats making the rounds.

If it ends up on a t-shirt and I start making royalties...

Melrose Place checks finally stop coming?

[SmokeyTheBear]

I fixed the second one for you.

.

actually gideon believes all parody is fair use and the easter bunny whereas i believe in reality

[NALEM]

Gotta be a combo of the glasses, hair and expression? I'm pretty flattered thats making the rounds.

If it ends up on a t-shirt and I start making royalties... well then I have arrived.

Jay we agree this was a great shot ...



and this one is my favorite

CLICK HERE FOR MORE OF LAJ @ YNOT SUMMIT

[InfoGuy]

Should say LOSER not POSER.

Jay shouldn't be in a picture marked LOSER. Joan, Chris and Alex deserve that honor.

[DamianJ]

and this one is my favorite

Cos it's out of focus. badly composed, badly cropped and badly lit?

[seeandsee]

so what was changed ?!?!

[munki]

Jay we agree this was a great shot
and this one is my favorite

CLICK HERE FOR MORE OF LAJ @ YNOT SUMMIT

You're a special breed of clueless, piece of shit fucktard, aren't ya? Try learning how to use your camera, before selling out next time reject.

[Coup]

[fris]

The image in question:


The email:



What would Jesus do?

maybe he should file a proper dmca and not email it to the site owner, and send it to the right person.

[Chosen]

[marlboroack]

.xxx FTW!!! F the haters

[TubeKing]

[TheDoc]

Wouldn't NALEM technically need a model release from Jay (and everyone) before they can legally post the picture online or claim ownership?

I'm sure I could find some court cases to reference this if I cared enough. That's before knowing you actually have to copyright something before it's protected under dmca. And you can't protect what you don't legally own, and you don't legally own it without model releases.

That's before it's clear relationship to on-going, newsworthy, overall industry topic that directly relates to why/how/what the pictures were taken for. Nobody would be doing it for profit, republish as the org, etc.. overall, a monkey could fight this in court and win. That goes for all industry pictures... taken by anyone.

[georgeyw]

Does this guy have to apply for press / media certification before he can attend any show?

If he does then why on earth would anyone ever let him in?

[MaDalton]

Wouldn't NALEM technically need a model release from Jay (and everyone) before they can legally post the picture online or claim ownership?

I'm sure I could find some court cases to reference this if I cared enough. That's before knowing you actually have to copyright something before it's protected under dmca. And you can't protect what you don't legally own, and you don't legally own it without model releases.

That's before it's clear relationship to on-going, newsworthy, overall industry topic that directly relates to why/how/what the pictures were taken for. Nobody would be doing it for profit, republish as the org, etc.. overall, a monkey could fight this in court and win. That goes for all industry pictures... taken by anyone.

i remember signing an agreement a couple of times at registration that i know and accept that pictures are taken at the show. that way it's covered.

[Tasty1]

JFK just removes pictures if you ask him, no court order needed ;)

And because people feel uncomfortable when .xxx sponsored pictures are made, we don’t allow commercial pictures taken by photographers on the Dutch Webmaster Meeting. It looks like people get itchy balls and stiff fingers when Nailem is around. It is also not very nice that our visitors have to visit several sites to see if there are pictures they want to remove.

Except JFK, the official webmaster meeting photographer and Baddog no commercial pictures can be taken.

[TheDoc]

i remember signing an agreement a couple of times at registration that i know and accept that pictures are taken at the show. that way it's covered.

Don't get me wrong... I'm not saying they aren't allowed or some don't have the right, or that it's a bad thing at all, I like the Industry pictures.

My focus is the idea that asking someone to take down an Industry event picture posted on an industry forum, covering an industry topic, wouldn't stand a chance in court... that's before the fact that a release wasn't signed, copyright never claimed and I bet they don't have a registered agent, making the request for take down frivolous when you can't make a registered counter claim.

[DWB]

[iamtam]

feel free to use my avatar if you like

[TubeKing]

ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL dwb

[TheSquealer]

What a little bitch. You try to make a living by taking pics of people who for the most part don't want their pics taken or didn't ask to. You don't credit them or put their name or identifying info on the pics of the subjects so that there is some benefit to them... there is only a benefit to you, but someone chops one of your pics and its a huge deal.

Fucking idiot.