GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   OJ Confesses He Killed Wife and Ron Goldman (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1027703)

Bladewire 06-26-2011 09:44 AM

http://www.gifsoup.com/webroot/anima...s/163649_o.gif

Mutt 06-26-2011 09:55 AM

hahahaha i love when Orenthal tries to act sincere, he's the total narcissist.

CyberHustler 06-26-2011 10:09 AM

:1orglaugh

CDSmith 06-26-2011 10:16 AM

At least he's getting his mileage out of all that football talent. I'm sure it helps him play keepaway from all those prison homos wanting to make him their bitch.

Run OJ, run!

CaptainHowdy 06-26-2011 10:20 AM

I need to state that I don't care ...

billywatson 06-26-2011 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 18235586)
my theory has always been this. O.J. knew that his ex wife was sleeping with dudes on his property. He also knew that she owed money to the columbian cartel on a drug debt. So he didnt pay the debt and they killed them. I think that's why the glove did not fit him. :2 cents: funny no dna was extracted from the glove!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Either that or he caught them fucking and he murdered them in cold blood and got away with it.

One or the other.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rangermoore 06-26-2011 12:36 PM

Not gonna happen..

HerPimp 06-26-2011 12:42 PM

doesnt fit, you must acquit

shimmy2 06-26-2011 02:29 PM

plead the fif.
5.
1 2 3 4 fiiiiiiiff

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/legacy_imag.../admin/Fif.jpg

ShellyCrash 06-26-2011 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thickcash_amo (Post 18236557)
I don't ever read or buy celebrity books, but if he did a tell all I would wait in freaking line to get my hands on that shit!

He did. It was called "OJ Simpson- If I Did It"

http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/contri...f-i-did-it.jpg

But then there was this big legal battle and the goldman family got it pulled, edited and re-released:

http://geckosbark.com/wp-content/upl...I_did_It_2.png

I'd like to read it someday, but from what I have heard its mostly fluff and OJ tries to build it up like Nicole was really fucked up and pretty much drove him to do it. But he stipulates it's a "fictionalized" account. The original title was supposed to be "If I Did It, Here's How".

Diomed 06-26-2011 03:33 PM

Any doubts of mine about OJ's guilt were immediately withdrawn when i heard the 911 calls from Nicole that she previously made.

BSleazy 06-26-2011 04:03 PM

He can get paroled after serving 9 years.

Mutt 06-26-2011 04:09 PM

has there been any updates about the two kids he had with Nicole? they were young when their mother was murdered. i think they were being raised by OJ, seem to remember there was some drama with the daughter. now they're old enough to read all the accounts of the case they have to know that their father killed their mother. if they're half normal that would be a major accomplishment.

GatorB 06-26-2011 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCyber (Post 18241708)
He can get paroled after serving 9 years.

Being up for parole and getting paroled are two vastly different things. You think he is getting out after 9 years? I think serving 9 year for stealing your own shit back is retarded though. There are child molesters that get less time. You could run a meth lab at a day care center and get less time.

brassmonkey 06-26-2011 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 18241814)
Being up for parole and getting paroled are two vastly different things. You think he is getting out after 9 years? I think serving 9 year for stealing your own shit back is retarded though. There are child molesters that get less time. You could run a meth lab at a day care center and get less time.

it was revenge they jury was screaming guilty b4 the trial.

HarryMuff 06-26-2011 05:47 PM

Links pulled.

chaze 06-26-2011 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy2 (Post 18241600)
plead the fif.
5.
1 2 3 4 fiiiiiiiff

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/legacy_imag.../admin/Fif.jpg

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh he will never, he is dumb but not stupid.

GatorB 06-26-2011 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 18241816)
it was revenge they jury was screaming guilty b4 the trial.

Do you think the parole board will be any different? Anyways if he gets out in 2017 he'll be 70.

WarChild 06-26-2011 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18241040)
i don't know the legal system very well but if he confessed to killing them in self defense , could they not try him for manslaughter or some other lesser charge ?

I don't know for sure, but I believe that doubke jeopardy also covers lesser included crimes. So if a prosecutor can't, for instance, make a case for murder 1, but they could for murder 2, then the charge would be murder 2. Otherwise they could just keep pressing charges one after the other starting at the worst and working their way down. That wouldn't be fair.

gabe100 06-26-2011 06:17 PM

I remember that trial well and it was riveting. I worked at Microsoft in the Water Tower in West LA and this was right after the company rolled out Windows 95 and right before rolling out NT 4.0 and when the verdicts were read, everyone stopped working. And at Microsoft, you never stopped. I just remember that day though, everyone just kind of went home.

Interesting to see if he finally cops to it.

chaze 06-26-2011 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gabe100 (Post 18241902)
I remember that trial well and it was riveting. I worked at Microsoft in the Water Tower in West LA and this was right after the company rolled out Windows 95 and right before rolling out NT 4.0 and when the verdicts were read, everyone stopped working. And at Microsoft, you never stopped. I just remember that day though, everyone just kind of went home.

Interesting to see if he finally cops to it.

NT 4.0 I remember that. Nice

brassmonkey 06-26-2011 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 18241851)
Do you think the parole board will be any different? Anyways if he gets out in 2017 he'll be 70.

he opened that door. :2 cents: i do think he will get parole. the stuff he was trying to get back in the hotel he was suppose to give to the victims families. karma got his ass. If he didnt killed the two i bet he knows who did.

GatorB 06-26-2011 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 18241910)
he opened that door. :2 cents: i do think he will get parole. the stuff he was trying to get back in the hotel he was suppose to give to the victims families. karma got his ass. If he didnt killed the two i bet he knows who did.

The guy that stole OJs stuff wasn't giving it to the victims family either. Why didn't he go to jail? Just because OJ got off on one crime doesn't mean you bastardize the legal system to get him back on another one. If I kill someone and get off doesn't mean you get the right to throw me in jail for 10 years for jaywalking. Any regular citizen doing the "crime" OJ did would have done 2 years max if that.

brassmonkey 06-26-2011 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 18241933)
The guy that stole OJs stuff wasn't giving it to the victims family either. Why didn't he go to jail? Just because OJ got off on one crime doesn't mean you bastardize the legal system to get him back on another one. If I kill someone and get off doesn't mean you get the right to throw me in jail for 10 years for jaywalking. Any regular citizen doing the "crime" OJ did would have done 2 years max if that.

OJ didnt file a police report because he knew the stuff would be turned over to the families. he should have sent some gangstas over there to pick up his shit.

camperjohn64 06-26-2011 08:26 PM

If I was that girl's father I would have kidnapped OJ and beat him to death...over 20 years time.

SmokeyTheBear 06-26-2011 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 18241857)
I don't know for sure, but I believe that doubke jeopardy also covers lesser included crimes. So if a prosecutor can't, for instance, make a case for murder 1, but they could for murder 2, then the charge would be murder 2. Otherwise they could just keep pressing charges one after the other starting at the worst and working their way down. That wouldn't be fair.

well i think the idea would be that you cant try for murder 2 knowing it qualified and was already tried as murder1 but if he confessed to killing them in self defense it would be an entirely different charge..

SmokeyTheBear 06-26-2011 08:46 PM

they could also try him again on a federal charge for the same crime it appears

also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Felix proves there is a way you could try him with "conspiracy to commit murder"

kristin 06-26-2011 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 18235644)
yeah i thought it was probably a fake rumor - i want it to be true though.

i followed that story from beginning to end, from breaking into Monday Night Football with the Ford Bronco chase until the verdict. i grew up a Buffalo Bills fan near Buffalo, he was a big part of my childhood.

the world was different then, there was no Internet, people became obsessed with following the trial and all the characters in it. maybe it was the first reality TV show.

I remember having surgery the day the verdict came out and I asked how they found as soon as I woke up. For sure thought he'd go down.

I grew up about an hour outside Buffalo.

NetHorse 06-27-2011 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18241040)
i don't know the legal system very well but if he confessed to killing them in self defense , could they not try him for manslaughter or some other lesser charge ?

No, he can't be tried in criminal court at all for that crime or anything even related to it.

For the reasons I listed on page one. Our justice system is based on that law in that the government should not prosecute a case until they are sure that they have all the evidence needed to secure a conviction.

Otherwise prosecutors would keep dragging anyone who was found innocent of a crime into court until they got any sort of conviction to stick. As with anything ruled on by the supreme court, there are no exceptions.

sicone 06-27-2011 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 18235650)
WRONG. it's called new evidence, different charge different conviction...

proof: he was found guilty already in a civil suit for murder


I did forget about his armed robbery charge and sentence though.

I'd ask the law school you went to for a refund

FYI.. Civil and Criminal courts are 2 different things with different laws and burdens of proof.

TB Adriana 06-27-2011 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NetHorse (Post 18236404)

QFT :upsidedow

theking 06-27-2011 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NetHorse (Post 18242315)
No, he can't be tried in criminal court at all for that crime or anything even related to it.

For the reasons I listed on page one. Our justice system is based on that law in that the government should not prosecute a case until they are sure that they have all the evidence needed to secure a conviction.

Otherwise prosecutors would keep dragging anyone who was found innocent of a crime into court until they got any sort of conviction to stick. As with anything ruled on by the supreme court, there are no exceptions.

Unless there is a statue of limitations...and I don't think there is...he could be tried for a violation of their "civil rights". The Feds have used this charge many times when jurors have aquitted murderers and for lesser crimes also. The Feds charged the cops that beat Rodney King with a violation of his "civil rights" when the state jury aquitted them and they went to prison after being found guilty of the Federal charge. I am not certain but I think the max on the charge is five years.

GatorB 06-27-2011 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18242039)
they could also try him again on a federal charge for the same crime it appears

also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Felix proves there is a way you could try him with "conspiracy to commit murder"

Who did he conspire with, himself? A conspiracy has to involved at least 2 people. That would also mean proving premeditation. If he was just going over to see Nicole and he saw her with Goldman and went apeshit and killed them in a rage that's not "conspiracy" since it wasn't planned.

ShellyCrash 06-27-2011 05:32 AM

If he came out and confessed they could always find something. They wouldn't put him in jail for life and he'd never get a sentence anywhere near as harsh as murder 1.

It's tough to say what he would be charged on as different charges have different time limitations. For instance, time has probably run out on any domestic violence charges. The violation of civil rights is one I have heard of before. Also if they can show any of the wounds were inflicted post mortem he could get abuse of a corpse, etc.

Here's a case where a guy killed his fiance, was acquitted, and then when further evidence came out he confessed. They wound up putting him away for perjury a few times- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Ignatow

cherrylula 06-27-2011 06:17 AM

man they caught bin laden, now this? crazy times. lol.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123