Freedom of Speech... Anthony Weiner Vs Ron Paul....

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • sperbonzo
    I'd rather be on my boat.
    • May 2003
    • 9750
    #1

    Freedom of Speech... Anthony Weiner Vs Ron Paul....

    Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

    [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

    ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber
    Tags: None
    • sperbonzo
      I'd rather be on my boat.
      • May 2003
      • 9750
      #2
      It's short, but it's sweet!







      .
      Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

      [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

      ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

        Comment

        • moeloubani
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2007
          • 4235
          #3
          Your face looks a bit like Anthony Weiner's

          (had 'You look like Anthony Weiner' but that might be misinterpreted as your penises are similar)

            Comment

            • dynastoned
              mmm yeah!
              • Feb 2005
              • 5061
              #4
              ron paul is the man

                Comment

                • Joshua G
                  dumb libs love censorship
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 8198
                  #5
                  Ron Paul is the only true republican.

                    Comment

                    • BFT3K
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 10764
                      #6
                      Corporate monopolization of the airways is just as dangerous as government control. You are still only fed the information that they want to feed you, complete with whatever spins they choose.

                      Weiner is also correct. No one wants their young children watching inappropriate materials, freely, on publicly broadcasted channels.

                      The REAL problem is that our politicians are constantly changing and/or proposing new laws, rules, and regulations. From the job securing, egomaniac angle, this is a self-serving act of pseudo-relevance. From the solidly corrupt system angle, it's also the way they payback those who helped get them elected or re-elected.
                      Last edited by BFT3K; 06-23-2011, 08:42 AM.

                        Comment

                        • sperbonzo
                          I'd rather be on my boat.
                          • May 2003
                          • 9750
                          #7
                          Originally posted by BFT3K

                          Weiner is also correct. No one wants their young children watching inappropriate materials, freely, on publicly broadcasted channels.
                          .
                          You do realize that this is easily the same ideology that says: "No one wants their young children watching inappropriate materials, freely, on public internet."

                          The answer should ALWAYS be that PARENTS are supposed to be in charge of what their children look at, and the rest of us should not have our rights curtailed because parents are too lazy to be parents. There is no difference, in most households, in the access to "network" TV or HBO. Parents should not allow their kids to watch things without parental supervision, and that's that.




                          .


                          .
                          Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

                          [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

                          ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

                            Comment

                            • BFT3K
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 10764
                              #8
                              Originally posted by sperbonzo
                              You do realize that this is easily the same ideology that says: "No one wants their young children watching inappropriate materials, freely, on public internet."

                              The answer should ALWAYS be that PARENTS are supposed to be in charge of what their children look at, and the rest of us should not have our rights curtailed because parents are too lazy to be parents. There is no difference, in most households, in the access to "network" TV or HBO. Parents should not allow their kids to watch things without parental supervision, and that's that.
                              Porn is not currently broadcast on public TV, and the internet is not currently too restricted.

                              I am asking, why are politicians always shaking shit up, even when things are currently fine? It is to argue new arguments, rehash old arguments, and to pass new laws and regulations, ultimately serving their corporate overlords, securing their political existence.

                              The internet will not be restricted based upon "moral" or "ethical" arguments - it will be restricted and chopped up based upon corporate greed and control... and government control too.
                              Last edited by BFT3K; 06-23-2011, 08:53 AM.

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...