![]() |
Blekko look like a joke,especially if ODP people are founders where you needed to pay editor 5000$ if you want to add your link there.
|
horrible results
looked up some basic products and they are all major blog spam pages |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and http://www.businessinsider.com/gabri...kduckgo-2011-1 answers a bit about architecture, in the second link he answers questions. |
Nice search engine, but DuckDuckGo? Isn't that a game we all played when we were 3? "Duck, duck, duck, duck, goose!"
Just seems a weird name of a search engine. "Just Google it" versus "Just DuckDuckGo it". |
Not working for me.
Quote:
|
Quote:
A while ago there was a discussion on Blekko on one of the webmaster forums, everyone was given a challenge to find very hard to get information on the internet using Google, Bing and Blekko search. In the end we could only find 3 websites on the internet with the information. All three were listed in the top 5 serps on google and bing. Blekko had none. And the reason why blekko had none was because they had banned the only websites that actually had the information. And that is why Blekko are idiots and their search engine is a joke. All they do is sit around banning websites till they have now got to the point that no-one can find the information their seeking on blekko because its all banned. Talk about a bunch of idiots that run blekko. Blekko need to stop banning websites and start focusing on delivering the best results. |
Quote:
From their website.... What's with the name? It is derived from Duck Duck Goose, but it's not a metaphor?really. If you're wondering how you would turn that into a verb...Duck it! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think they'll make the same mistake twice though. |
Interesting article on how the owner of DuckDuckGo spent $7,000 on a billboard in tech-heavy San Francisco to stick it up Google....http://www.businessinsider.com/indie...tention-2011-1
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also, I see one of my sites in their results has a nice red circle next to it which says "This site may be harmful" when hovering over it. Why might my site containing absolutely no viruses or exploits be considered harmful? Because some German kooks over at MyWot.com rated it down as "Nix für Kids und Jugendliche" (Not for kids and young people). Yeah, no shit sherlock...it's a fucking porn site. :error
I see a bunch of perfectly safe porn sites in their results with this bogus rating thanks to MyWot. Gives an impression of a virus on the site or something, when it's really just some do-gooders rating porn down. Anything which brings some pain to Google I'm down to get behind. But not while they have this kind of BS warning system going on. They get rid of that, and I'm down to promote them everywhere I can. |
ODP = more corrupt than the bureaucracies of some Third World countries. Good luck getting listed in a competitive niche
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
interesting that duckduckgo is doing an advertising push recently :2 cents:
Thom Holwerda, who reviewed the search engine for OSNews, praised its privacy features and shortcuts to site-specific searches as well as criticizing Google for, "...track[ing] pretty much everything you do", particularly because of the risk of such information being subject to a U.S. government subpoena. [34] In 2012, in response to accusations that it was a monopoly, Google identified DuckDuckGo as a competitor. Weinberg was reportedly "pleased and entertained" by that acknowledgment.[24] |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123