![]() |
Quote:
I think the true money making idea with phones is connecting you to other people with phones, via dating type mobile site. Imagine being in a bar, mall or just driving around town and being able to log on via your phone with GPS and see were the location (or general location for privacy issues) of tons of single girls are, read their bio and see their video clips, pick the one you like an send her a wink, she checks out your bio etc... if she is interested she starts texting you. Not fake geo targeting shit, but a guy being at a bar and noticing through he phone that 2 other single chicks are there. If you both are interested then go talk in person and hook up... it surely makes it easier for dudes with no balls to meet girls a lot easier (which is 99% of the guys) and girls to be able to weed out the freaks/creeps/stalkers at lot easier then dealing with people face to face until they feel comfortable with them. I could see millions in the 18-35 crowd spending $20 a month for a service like that. Quote:
|
Quote:
Circle jerking is not a mean to make traffic ? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh (but you are right) |
Quote:
I also agree, Swinger based social communities are the only ones that will really work well. All the rest is just fluff and shit. Social networking sites are not made to model porn sites but where porn sites can use to get traffic from if used effectively. Quote:
That just doesn't happen in adult unless you send out 100 million spam emails and hope to get .0001% sign up. People just don't go viral with porn, who wants to email family, friends and co-workers about some new really cool porn site. First of all there has been very few or none very cool porn sites anyways, and even if they had been some people aren't going to go viral with it 1% as much as they would with the next mainstream gimmick. |
Quote:
Will blow up in the future like every other bubble. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
better communication and the addition of something similar to fb wall sharing would improve the attitudes and business here on gfy. being a bunch of anonymous avatars allows people to get nasty rather than productive. there is no 'friend' atmosphere and no group dynamic here. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's like crack for a lot of people who don't have their own lives. You have 3 types of people on FB, 1. the ones who love to post about anything, the *look at me* people who love the attention and post about anything " hey look at the turd I just shit out everyone!" 2. the people who are casual users, make occasional updates, occasionaly read other people's shit, and then you have 3. The people with no lives who spend all day reading what everyone else has been doing and looking at their pictures. The middle group may come and go but the core users on FB are #1 and #3. FB is like hooking a crack addict up with a crack dealer. The *look at me* people who post about anything and everything are the crack dealers and the people with no lives who read the shit all day are the crack addicts. You never going to lose those 2 groups of people, they hooked. FB will be around and very popular for a long time, at least in internet time, which is 10+ years before another similar but slightly different site competes with them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Grindr has grown rapidly in the gay market.
Social network + location proximity + mobile text communication Wouldn't work in the straight market for porn, but a similar product for other maibstream interests might have legs. |
Quote:
I agree, terrible: http://www.isecpartners.com/files/iS...ons.BH2006.pdf |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ever been lost at a party or convention? You see some dude with a Canuck jacket (who you are also a fan of) and immediately, you feel like you have someone you can approach? I will say flat out, I never believed in making straight porn social except in the very limited degrees like sharing links and videos. Trying to, may be imposing a set of rules on something that can't take it. When Sean says there are plenty of opportunities, there is still massive room in social interactions and connections, some adult-related. For some inspiration, think of how storytelling evolved: oral tales -> books -> audiobooks -> movies Porn's evolution may be in a different medium or technology, but not necessarily social. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What value does the social network have to the user? That is the question. For the swinger group it is meeting other people to have sex with primarily or to show off (part of the sexual height for some). Age, hair color, location, sexual interests - these things matter to swingers. But if I'm just Joe six pack interested in porn while married to my wife what do I care about these things as they relate to other average guys interested in porn? I don't. ...But I might care about what kind of content they are interested in and what they share. If they really tend to have interesting stuff (same fetish) then I might be interested in their writings on a certain sexual topic (like a blog). Ever seen one of those "super threads" on a surfer forum where one guy posts 2,000 replies loaded with content and 1,000 different users "thank" him? That should show that it can be done and that there is a market. A porn social network should integrate other media and presentation methods. Tubes, blogs, photo gallery, discussion forums, the works. But not just a hodge podge of different components added ars an afterthought (as is common now) but a totally integrated experience. You would want to create a place where people feel they can go to share everything related to the porn which interests them. primarily. Secondarily you want people to want to go there to find content. The REAL trick and draw would be in all the details and finishing touches to make the experience useful and intuitive for Joe Sixpack. How do you help him find the content he wants? How do you help him find interesting providers of content? ...Of course this would pretty much be content piracy hell without strong efforts to keep content "legal" or "acceptable". But just as with tubes and forums you can also use this as a means to make sales from teaser content as well. If you find the idea useful and want to do me a favor, please push harder when it comes repeat infringers, Fabian. :) |
Quote:
|
I think we'll still need to wait a few years for the next huge technology jump in porn, Virtual Reality.
How can porn be offered? a) images or b) real interaction. a) Images: it can be either pics or videos. Technology has improved really fast to the point of being able to offer streamed HD videos at affordable costs (hosting). What else can you add to it? more resolution? pointless, HD is more than enough. I think we have peaked on the visual technology part. Tubes will be here for a long time. b) Real interaction: it can mean more interaction with what you see in the videos, to feel part of it, and here we are talking about Virtual reality. AEBN tried it with that idea about the pussy you can connect by USB and that moves synced with the videos. It was a good idea, but imho not the business model they tried to use, to pay big bucks for hardware and then also pay for a subscription. If you can cover the initial costs, the better model would be what mobile phone companies use, to offer the hardware for free or really cheap but after signing an X months membership or contract like when you join mobile phone companies. 3D could also be the next thing and technology is already there (still very basic), it fits porn perfectly. The future could be a mix of 3D with a pussy or some kind of VR glasses or even something more advanced that is closer to Real Virtuality still to be invented, that even allows you to listen, watch, smell and touch. The other way of interaction is social networking, but as Fabian said, i don't see an FB clone that big in porn. Maybe a social community that also acts as a hub for dating, dirty talking & flirting/showing off and 1 on 1 virtual sex through webcams could work, but have on mind that still a huge % of the users are men, so you could face the problem of most of dating programs, that have way more men that women and need to use fake female users to keep the men fooled to renew. The problem is that you can fake emails and profiles, but not 1 on 1 virtual sex. Also one of the big points of FB is that it created trust based on the removal of the usual internet anonymity, people there have real names and surnames and i don't see it working for porn. Porn or virtual sex is not remotely socially accepted enough to be something that most of users would want to share in public or to take risks without anonymity. What if you discover some known people in the porn social network? or even worse, you end doing 1 on 1 virtual sex with some random that ends being your neighbor? your boss/employee?? your wife??? your daughter?????? As Fabian said, it would work better for swingers. I guess manwin is also waiting like most of us, and maybe even working on that next idea, but in the mean time, they just want to get control over as much traffic as possible, so when that next idea is developed, they just need to push it to their traffic. you can't say it is a bad business model for this waiting period. I admire what they are doing (except the usage of copyrighted content but we have enough threads about it with Paul M so we better don't start another discussion here about that). |
Quote:
It's virtual swinging for the 30+ crowd. |
Quote:
|
Internet revolution is one a very fast pace. In the next few years, great thing would be put up on the web again. And we will be part of it.
|
Porn is:a.) substitutionFor the vast majority of porn fans it is not a social event ... |
Quote:
|
A mobile dating site for the gay community would probably blow up pretty big if done right.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Facebook is the front runner... Manwin will follow suit |
So... You are trying desperately to justify being a pussy?
j/k |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123