GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Google Boss: We?ll Fight Anti-Piracy Blocking Laws (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1023250)

gideongallery 05-20-2011 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 18155526)
So a business should keep track of everything you buy from them incase you lose or damage your copy ? hahahahaha

as i said for most transaction it already happens

loyalty programs already track people purchases right now

it would take less then 15 lines of code to make any subscription based system (tv, paysite, etc) give you access until you quit.

it just a datequit < datecontentreleased > datestarted comparison to tell you which content a person has access too for their "permenent collection"

gideongallery 05-20-2011 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18155514)
considering the fact that when mpaa argued in favor of banning the vcr after they lost one of their complaints was the fact that a person recording their favorite movie on tv could pause recording while the commercials were playing to get commercial free version as a "permenent" copy.



http://cryptome.org/hrcw-hear.htm

how stupid do you have to be to not realize the "Choice" you just gave me was another example of you trying to go backwards on the rights the court have already given me.

the courts didn't make pause buttons that only worked during playback

they didn't prevent the pausing while recording

they granted me the right to make my archive commercial free if i wanted it

how can you not see that your actually trying to take way that court granted right with your "choice"

correction is bolded

Robbie 05-20-2011 07:45 PM

After some deep thought on this whole subject I have come to this conclusion:

gideongallery :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

kane 05-20-2011 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18155514)
considering the fact that when mpaa argued in favor of banning the vcr after they lost one of their complaints was the fact that a person recording their favorite movie on tv could pause recording while the commercials were playing to get commercial free version as a "permenent" copy.



http://cryptome.org/hrcw-hear.htm

how stupid do you have to be to not realize the "Choice" you just gave me was another example of you trying to go backwards on the rights the court have already given me.

the courts didn't make pause buttons that only worked during playback

they did prevent the pausing while recording

they granted me the right to make my archive commercial free if i wanted it

how can you not see that your actually trying to take way that court granted right with your "choice"

so then let me rephase. your two options for downloading a TV show are:

1. Torrent,. no questions asked. commercial free show.

2. Studio supplied download site. The show is commercial free, but there is some type of authentication process in place to prove that you have the right to be downloading this material.

Which do you go with?

gideongallery 05-20-2011 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 18155576)
so then let me rephase. your two options for downloading a TV show are:

1. Torrent,. no questions asked. commercial free show.

2. Studio supplied download site. The show is commercial free, but there is some type of authentication process in place to prove that you have the right to be downloading this material.

Which do you go with?

asuming it was equal it quaility

and the authentication process was no more intrusive then you originally talked about

number 2 every time

for the simple reason that i don't want to have to waste my time explaining to any copyright holder why i have a fair use right to use the pirate site (like i did when i got the letter regarding lost way back when)

i would rather spend those hours getting paid for working or spending the time with my family and friends enjoying myself.

kane 05-20-2011 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18155618)
asuming it was equal it quaility

and the authentication process was no more intrusive then you originally talked about

number 2 every time

for the simple reason that i don't want to have to waste my time explaining to any copyright holder why i have a fair use right to use the pirate site (like i did when i got the letter regarding lost way back when)

i would rather spend those hours getting paid for working or spending the time with my family and friends enjoying myself.

Fair enough


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123