| pornlaw |
05-30-2011 07:28 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOtherGuy
(Post 18176517)
As respectfully as can be intonated :
Why eventually? WTF? You mean it has not been done yet after all these years? Or even attempted? Seriously?
Why has a host not been thrown in with infringement in the first place as a contributory infringer? I think that would be logical from the get go of any copyright infringement situation. I know that if I were copyright attorney thats where I would take a copyright battle from the start.
I am confused?
|
From a theoretical situation it should be a easy jump. However, ISPs have lots of money, lots of lawyers and clout. Any judge is going to be cautious in regards to allowing a major US corporation be joined to this type of lawsuit. We have some judges in the bit torrent cases that are not even allowing certain attorneys the ability to seek the identities of the downloaders. They are throwing out the cases even before they start by blocking discovery. Which, in my opinion, is a ridiculous decision.
We have a great judge in our case. He immediately granted our motion for expedited discovery and even granted a 90 day extension to join parties to the lawsuit.
There is no real case law being developed in these matters and it will take a client and a lawyer willing to do so to get to that point. And its going to take the right judge. And moreso, it will require the right legal argument with the right set of facts.
As a lawyer and/or a client you never want to make bad case law. For some of us involved this isnt a money issue, for some of us this is the future of the industry and how the public uses the internet to download and access free content - even in regards to tube sites.
|