Possible Delay in Availability of .xxx Domains??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Connor
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2003
    • 1294

    #31
    I spoke to the board right before they approved it. Reminded them they had no community support and that they KNEW they didn't. Still, look at all those "yes" votes. This is how people lose complete faith in boards/organizations like ICANN and come to know that they're there to look after the interests of the money people, nobody else.


    YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! | SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

    Comment

    • iamtam
      So Fucking Banned
      • Feb 2010
      • 1211

      #32
      european union likely to move to block .xxx outright. end of issue.

      Comment

      • alias
        aliasx
        • Apr 2001
        • 19010

        #33
        Originally posted by Herd
        voted yes
        Peter Dengate Thrush
        Steve Crocker
        Rita Rodin Johnston
        Erika Mann
        Raymond A. Plzak
        Bertrand de la Chapelle
        Gonzalo Navarro
        Mike Silber
        Rajasekhar Ramaraj

        voted no
        George Sadowsky
        Katim Touray
        Kuo-Wei Wu

        didnt even vote
        Rod Beckstrom
        Sebastien Bachollet
        Cherine Chalaby
        Bruce Tonkin
        Excellent information.
        https://porncorporation.com

        Comment

        • davecummings
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2003
          • 2922

          #34
          Originally posted by iamtam
          european union likely to move to block .xxx outright. end of issue.
          That would make things interesting for .xxx
          Dave Cummings
          www.davecummings.com
          www.davecummings.tv
          San Diego

          Email--- [email protected]

          Comment

          • cherrylula
            lol
            • Jan 2002
            • 15969

            #35
            oooh the dramaz.... money lol, lol money.

            Comment

            • Herd
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2011
              • 101

              #36
              Originally posted by Connor
              I spoke to the board right before they approved it. Reminded them they had no community support and that they KNEW they didn't. Still, look at all those "yes" votes. This is how people lose complete faith in boards/organizations like ICANN and come to know that they're there to look after the interests of the money people, nobody else.
              All the more reason for an investigation.

              With pornography being the most controversial, looked downed upon, thin line of legality business, and for ICANN to give full blown legitimacy to only one company is absurd.

              The 9 members that voted yes, cannot be allowed to walk off into the sunset saying "the pressure will go away". Well, its not going to go away.

              Confront those members publicly because they hate that shit, when their reputation's are exposed to the masses.

              Hopefully, Gac will start speaking up more since ICANN made it official now, that the Gac's opinion is garbage to them, that "we dont need them, we dont want them".

              Comment

              • davecummings
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2003
                • 2922

                #37
                Originally posted by Herd
                All the more reason for an investigation.

                With pornography being the most controversial, looked downed upon, thin line of legality business, and for ICANN to give full blown legitimacy to only one company is absurd.

                The 9 members that voted yes, cannot be allowed to walk off into the sunset saying "the pressure will go away". Well, its not going to go away.

                Confront those members publicly because they hate that shit, when their reputation's are exposed to the masses.

                Hopefully, Gac will start speaking up more since ICANN made it official now, that the Gac's opinion is garbage to them, that "we dont need them, we dont want them".
                I'm pulling for GAC/Europe to prevail!!
                Dave Cummings
                www.davecummings.com
                www.davecummings.tv
                San Diego

                Email--- [email protected]

                Comment

                • Alprazolam
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 864

                  #38
                  EU won't mess around with them. They have to be running out of bribe money by now.

                  Comment

                  • Hotrocket
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2004
                    • 1327

                    #39
                    Death to .xxx

                    Comment

                    • davecummings
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 2922

                      #40
                      Look at what one retailer plans to charge (from yesterday's Ynot Newsletter).

                      http://www.ynot.com/content/116811-f...t-133-pop.html
                      Dave Cummings
                      www.davecummings.com
                      www.davecummings.tv
                      San Diego

                      Email--- [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • Herd
                        Confirmed User
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 101

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Alprazolam
                        EU won't mess around with them. They have to be running out of bribe money by now.
                        Thought ICM's "buy money" was in the stock piles.

                        Cause if there having troubling negotiating the best price with EU members, how are they going to afford Democratic Senators? Cause those guys dont work for cheap.

                        Comment

                        Working...