What would you like to read in an E Book about shooting porn?

Thank you so much for you comments about two pictures...

OK this is a fail for anything but Ex GF content. Looks like a BF hiding on the floor shooting his GF. Who looks pregnant.

Nice porn picture, girl looking into the with a nice enticing smile, holding up her big tits with nipples and erect and the open pussy is inviting. Only problem is it's at least 1.5 stops over exposed and a white girl is on a white lounger.

These were two of SImon Scans pictures "one of the best photographers posting here " NOT MINE .....

So you two can sort that out

But hey I don't blame you two, as Simon Scans has 503,687 photos on his site it is bound to be sausage factory...

Pauls point was that today's internet sausages arn't as good as those old Magazine sausages, and that sausages should be better made.

Simon doesn't like his sausages cut in strange places.

Paul is going to write a book (even though he says you can't learn anything from a book) on how to make sausages...

So forgive me if I don't want to do what you do, there is way to much of it about...



Hey look Simon a girl cut in half

Yes I'm a professional who shoots porn for profit, you seem to be like an amateur who shoots for fun.

The things I critisised like cropping were real basics. You either cut the girls whole foot off or you include all the foot, you don't just cut off the toes. If when you're shooting the girl isn't fitting into the frame you ask her to pull her foot in. Same goes for shaving an albow or side of the leg/arm. Move the girl or come out in the frame.

As for posing I see you just include the same poses we all do. There are 27 basic poses. And from there on it's all variations. You got some of them wrong.

Wedding photographers can be very creative, it depends what you're paying them. Look at Lord Lichfield's wedding photography.

The magazines sold in there 10,000s to 100,000s. They used different shooters in each magazine. So to get a different view point of the same niche/style. Colby never shot like Thomas, who never shot like Medland and none of them shot like me.

Different girls, locations and styles. There fore the magazine was kept varied. Just because you found them boring doesn't mean the millions of magazines readers thought so.

When will you get it?

I'M NOT A PHOTOGRAPHER. I'M A PORNOGRAPHER

Two entirely different things. So stop talking about photography or me being a photographer. It's pornography and pornographer.



Nice picture.



Bill paying porn. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Paul, I'm pretty sure I've bought stuff from you, so no disrespect, but you mention in your own post that people like Viv Thomas, Suze Randall, Steven Hicks, and Denys de Francesco can shoot for magazines. I don't particularly consider myself a photographer, but I've had work published by pretty much all the major adult publishing houses. If this is an educational thread, perhaps you could share your thoughts on where I and other magazine shooters are leaving money on the table in 2011.

These were two of SImon Scans pictures "one of the best photographers posting here " NOT MINE .....

So you two can sort that out

After watching tons of porn, I can honestly say that about 5% of them actually know what they're doing.

Online is all that's left today

You really are an idiot. It's not about if Simon likes my work better then his work or visa versa. It's about if members and surfers like it.

It is a point that is a puzzle, Paul Markham, is better porn maker, he worked for high class mags... he had a good head start with a back catalog.....

he also says he can market too.

Why is his site not the top porn site ?

Why don't the punters flock to his better content ?

It is a point that is a puzzle, Paul Markham, is better porn maker, he worked for high class mags... he had a good head start with a back catalog.....

he also says he can market too.

Why is his site not the top porn site ?

If you are better than everyone else on GFY, why don't the punters flock to your content with your "innovative" fake schtick about being a woman making porn?