![]() |
Quote:
I understand what you are saying, there is a market that doesn't want the 'in your face' degrading content and the more sensual stuff but that is a different market altogether than what most of us are selling here. Even the women want the nasty shit... In short, love making sites? small market base nasty fuck sites? make bank... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
this thread is awesome :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
The other point is we make the audience, change what you do create new audience. |
Quote:
we get more requests than most i'm sure, i've seen the emails, i talk with customer service often.. nobody around asking for cgi effects, sex in space or porn musicals... they want more of the same just different girls mostly... That being said we are releasing a pretty unique site out today that has a niche i've yet to see before so check that out later when we announce it :) |
Quote:
Every once in a while, there's a really new concept that does a ton of bucks for a little while until everybody copies it - and after that it just becomes a new niche. (Who did XGF stuff ten years ago?) So yes, there is space for creating new things. |
Quote:
Just saying " do something different " is no help and pretty much just talking in circles. So pretend you are a producer with unlimited resources and write us a scene the way you think it should be done. |
I'm going to stand apart from the crowd here... and blame Canada.
|
Quote:
|
This thread is stupid.... Facials FTW!
|
some people just spend too much time worrying about shit that don't matter anyway. :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
allow me to comment, and to a large extent i agree fully with Cherry7.
i think there are a lot of consumers of online porn who have little or no interaction with females, socially or sexually. to this extent there is a brewing bitterness where the consumer like to see the girl (since he cant have her) being degraded to some extent. there are always exceptions: the girl loves to be spit on, choked, slapped and cum on etc. there are actully a large ratio or porngirls who like this type treatment (sasha grey is a good example). facial/swallow type pop done right: a good facial pop is actually a product of finishing the guy orally but it has wrongfully evolved, we need it to go back to the girl blowing the guy until he cums type of pop, not the guy wanking in his face (this practice is gay and i never allow it on my set). creampies is the natural way, in the 70's/80's porn the guy would pull out and shoot on the girls tummy, this was nice also. @Dave when i ask the girl how they prefer it, often times they say creampie. you have to know how to ask... usually i tell them if creampie their make up will still look great. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It doesn't mean that we don't try to release new and whacky stuff to see if it works, we do more than most... diaperlovingmommies.com and spinonmycock.com are some recent releases of ours and if you think those aren't some what original then I'd hate to think what you think is... ;) |
Quote:
I may not be the average porn consumer. My idea of hot is seeing 2 naked girls kiss. Thats it. Buhkake is not my thing but I can understand it. Girl gives amazing blowjob and you want to show it off to the camera or to yourself. Thats fine. But what is up with spitting in a girls face after you have sex with her? Unless its something that she actually wants, I'll never understand it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This thing is not my thing either, but there's not much to "understand" or judge, on what happens between fully consenting adults. Following the "will never understand" path, you risk to consider immoral anything other than the missionary position. |
|
Quote:
I personally know many super hot girls who love to have a guy cum all over their face, they want their reward! |
Quote:
Why are face fucking, and gagging the most popular blowjob sites? Why are gaping and rough porn the most popular hardcore sites? Why are innocent looking teens the most popular solo girl sites? You know, this might sound strange, but watching porn for a lot of people is based on fetishes and fantasies, not what's normal. People aren't like, "hmm, I think I'll watch some lights out missionary position sex on the internet". Sorry, but if you aren't willing to cater to perverts you're likely not very successful in this industry. As Hugh Hefner says, "Sex in America has changed dramatically". |
Quote:
Quote:
I feel the same, I remember after working with a male porn star he showed me an award winning porn vid, a lass with big tits surrounded by 4 blokes jerking off. It was as erotic as yesterdays cold porridge on a winter camping holiday. Looking at most porn sites they are either fetish and wierd, or just identical porn vids, which you can watch for free 24 hours a day. To capture the chemistry between our performs is the main thing, a hot performance is not easy to get, but I think that some fresh ideas would help as well. One of our problems is girls are so used to doing to same scene for every producer the just do the same lifeless artificial fake act and groaning. They are more sexy brushing their hair. During the Hay's Code I believe actors were not allowed to kiss for more than 3 seconds. Then see how sexy Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman manage to be in Notorious, and yet we can film anything, no censorship, and yet the industry fails in so many scenes it makes. But Hey, if what you are doing makes you money and happy, congrats... |
Quote:
I think one of the reasons is that directors/photographers are not 'brands' anymore. In the VHS/DVD era there was for sure a lot of crap - but there was also an incentive for the director to produce movies with personality. One of the most despised and "commercial" directors of its time, Joe D'Amato, was STILL working with budgets, timeframes, scripts and actors that are a couple of orders of magnitude higher than the current average porn. Today he's a 'classic'. I am certainly not praising good ol' times for the sake of it, but it is a fact that today's directors are mostly "anonymous" serial workers with no recognized name, little budgets, little incentive to go anyhow out of the box if they are just shooting 30 facial scenes for "granmafacials.com" - their name won't be in the credits anyways, 99% of the times. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123