Oneverify changes... - GoFuckYourself.com

pr0 · 01-16-2003, 09:21 PM

Anyone else down right confused with their move to push free site makers out of their avs? Regular submissions will get basically no traffic now, & only people with 300 pic, 50 movie premium site's will be getting the traffic.

They want 300 pic / 50 movie site's, updated monthly with 50 more pics or "x" amount of movies...

Thats a shitload of content wanted for just an avs site, seems a little unfair in my opinion to ask that out of people.

I dunno just seems excessive, what do you think?

ZoiNk · 01-16-2003, 09:23 PM

I thought it was already excessive. I was submitting my "clean" avs sites that get approved on 20 AVSes, and they were getting rejected there.
ZoiNk

SpaceAce · 01-16-2003, 09:31 PM

They don't have any common sense. I was getting my sites rejected for "too many ads". Here was the logic:

A regular site needs to have 30 pics (3 galleries of 10) and can have two banners per page, total of 6 ads (I think it was). All the sites I made had 50 pics (5 galleries of 10). I actually had LESS ads on my members page than they allowed and no more than they allowed per gallery page, but since I had more gallery pages, the ads came up to more than 6, so I got rejected. I also had NO ads outside the members area, large thumbnails and nothing even remotely scammy. I was basically being <B>punished</B> for providing them with more than the minimum content.

After they refused to back down from that I realized I was wasting my time and I've been doing fine without them.

SpaceAce

Brujah · 01-16-2003, 09:51 PM

I think they just want to sell memberships, and not turn into a TGP. Rather than turn away good clean galleries though, they should try to implement a system of rewarding webmasters (priority listings) who make new sales instead of punishing webmasters that don't. Maybe a tiering system that doesn't list new sites at all until they start making new sales.

TurboTrucker · 01-16-2003, 10:27 PM

Hmm. My site was denied because the pictures were too small they said. My pictures are way bigger than the minimum they listed.

xxxdesign-net · 01-16-2003, 10:39 PM

Well, they want a network of quality sites... who can blame them... Its a real joke to see some of the AVS sites out there... Most look like tgp galleries but password protected!

marzzo · 01-16-2003, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TurboTrucker
Hmm. My site was denied because the pictures were too small they said. My pictures are way bigger than the minimum they listed.

Wow, your sig is bigger than your pictures... That's a fat banner

pr0 · 01-17-2003, 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Well, they want a network of quality sites... who can blame them... Its a real joke to see some of the AVS sites out there... Most look like tgp galleries but password protected!

300 pics dude?....30 megs a fucking site, how many can you have on a 60gig maxtor?...not a fucking ton....

Brad Mitchell · 01-17-2003, 01:21 AM

You can have 2000 30 meg sites on a 60 gig maxtor!

Brad

pr0 · 01-17-2003, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SinEmpire
You can have 2000 30 meg sites on a 60 gig maxtor!

Brad

still not enough!

01-16-2003, 09:21 PM	#1
pr0 rockin tha trailerpark Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: ~Coastal~ Posts: 23,088	Oneverify changes... Anyone else down right confused with their move to push free site makers out of their avs? Regular submissions will get basically no traffic now, & only people with 300 pic, 50 movie premium site's will be getting the traffic. They want 300 pic / 50 movie site's, updated monthly with 50 more pics or "x" amount of movies... Thats a shitload of content wanted for just an avs site, seems a little unfair in my opinion to ask that out of people. I dunno just seems excessive, what do you think?

01-16-2003, 09:23 PM	#2
ZoiNk Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 2,370	I thought it was already excessive. I was submitting my "clean" avs sites that get approved on 20 AVSes, and they were getting rejected there. ZoiNk __________________ "People can have the Model T in any color - so long as it's black." - Henry Ford

01-16-2003, 09:51 PM	#4
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	I think they just want to sell memberships, and not turn into a TGP. Rather than turn away good clean galleries though, they should try to implement a system of rewarding webmasters (priority listings) who make new sales instead of punishing webmasters that don't. Maybe a tiering system that doesn't list new sites at all until they start making new sales. __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

01-16-2003, 10:27 PM	#5
TurboTrucker Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Phoenix Arizona Posts: 2,363	Hmm. My site was denied because the pictures were too small they said. My pictures are way bigger than the minimum they listed. __________________

01-17-2003, 01:21 AM	#9
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,813	You can have 2000 30 meg sites on a 60 gig maxtor! Brad __________________ President at MojoHost \| brad at mojohost dot com \| Skype MojoHostBrad 71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999

01-16-2003, 09:31 PM	#3
SpaceAce Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Magrathea Posts: 6,493	They don't have any common sense. I was getting my sites rejected for "too many ads". Here was the logic: A regular site needs to have 30 pics (3 galleries of 10) and can have two banners per page, total of 6 ads (I think it was). All the sites I made had 50 pics (5 galleries of 10). I actually had LESS ads on my members page than they allowed and no more than they allowed per gallery page, but since I had more gallery pages, the ads came up to more than 6, so I got rejected. I also had NO ads outside the members area, large thumbnails and nothing even remotely scammy. I was basically being <B>punished</B> for providing them with more than the minimum content. After they refused to back down from that I realized I was wasting my time and I've been doing fine without them. SpaceAce

01-16-2003, 10:39 PM	#6
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	Well, they want a network of quality sites... who can blame them... Its a real joke to see some of the AVS sites out there... Most look like tgp galleries but password protected!