GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Obama Wants Internet IDs For Americans (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1005158)

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829723)
Ah yes, continue your misdirection and pray nobody notices your stupidity and lack of substance. I definitely enjoy it when you attempt to sound intelligent when you get your ass handed to you. That usually means you concede so I accept your concession. :winkwink:

Misdirection? There weren't any, you're just too simplistic to grasp the concept of my posts. All the same as to you not knowing you were engaging in circular reasoning.

This isn't difficult stuff here, Turbo.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829727)
Really? I don't recall promoting movies or anything that has obscenities in them. And if there ARE obscenities, then it wouldn't be PG-13 would it? At least TRY to keep up.

PG ratings are from the MPAA you moronic twit. You used the example, not me.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829728)
Misdirection? There weren't any, you're just too simplistic to grasp the concept of my posts. All the same as to you not knowing you were engaging in circular reasoning.

This isn't difficult stuff here, Turbo.

Sorry champ, you're too dumb to understand what circular reasoning is, which is why your attempts at misdirection are preceded by baseless assumption. That's ok I don't fault you. If I was delusional I wouldn't expect anyone to call me out on my bullshit. I definitely enjoy the denial at the end where you claim I just can't follow your "concepts", which lack any kind of logic or common sense.:1orglaugh

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829727)
Really? I don't recall promoting movies or anything that has obscenities in them. And if there ARE obscenities, then it wouldn't be PG-13 would it? At least TRY to keep up.

Directly from the MPAA:

PG-13 ? Parents Strongly Cautioned. Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13. A PG-13 rating is a sterner warning by the Rating Board to parents to determine whether their children under age 13 should view the motion picture, as some material might not be suited for them. A PG-13 motion picture may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category. The theme of the motion picture by itself will not result in a rating greater than PG-13, although depictions of activities related to a mature theme may result in a restricted rating for the motion picture. Any drug use will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. More than brief nudity will require at least a PG-13 rating, but such nudity in a PG-13 rated motion picture generally will not be sexually oriented. There may be depictions of violence in a PG-13 movie, but generally not both realistic and extreme or persistent violence. A motion picture?s single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, initially requires at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive requires an R rating, as must even one of those words used in a sexual context. The Rating Board nevertheless may rate such a motion picture PG-13 if, based on a special vote by a two-thirds majority, the Raters feel that most American parents would believe that a PG-13 rating is appropriate because of the context or manner in which the words are used or because the use of those words in the motion picture is inconspicuous.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829729)
PG ratings are from the MPAA you moronic twit. You used the example, not me.

Moronic twit is redundant you buffoon. Also, please show me "pg-13" sites with "obscenities". Your stupidity is definitely humorous. Following this epic fail, please explain to me your definition of "obscenities". I'll wait for the misdirection.

directfiesta 01-08-2011 06:29 PM

I am surprsided that there is no cover charge for this .... I mean the entertainment .... :1orglaugh

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829733)
Sorry champ, you're too dumb to understand what circular reasoning is, which is why your attempts at misdirection are preceded by baseless assumption. That's ok I don't fault you. If I was delusional I wouldn't expect anyone to call me out on my bullshit. I definitely enjoy the denial at the end where you claim I just can't follow your "concepts", which lack any kind of logic or common sense.:1orglaugh

Circular Reasoning ? supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829735)
Moronic twit is redundant you buffoon. Also, please show me "pg-13" sites with "obscenities". Your stupidity is definitely humorous. Following this epic fail, please explain to me your definition of "obscenities". I'll wait for the misdirection.

Holy shit you need a dictionary.

TheDoc 01-08-2011 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829715)
LOL@someone with a double digit IQ discussing big words. Yes I am just an affiliate, one who is more successful than you, the smut peddler. Hahahahahah:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

LOL@at a stain pretending he's anything but a stain.

Yeah, just an affiliate, the same type of Affiliate I've been paying every two weeks for 15 years.

And boy - even as an affiliate, your amount is piss - even for the sponsor you push, it's piss. Even pretending it's anything else, shows how small you are.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829735)
Moronic twit is redundant you buffoon. Also, please show me "pg-13" sites with "obscenities". Your stupidity is definitely humorous. Following this epic fail, please explain to me your definition of "obscenities". I'll wait for the misdirection.

ob·scen·i·ty   
[uhb-sen-i-tee, -see-ni-] Show IPA
?noun, plural -ties for 2, 3.
1.
the character or quality of being obscene; indecency; lewdness.
2.
something obscene, as a picture or story.
3.
an obscene word or expression, esp. when used as an invective.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829737)
Circular Reasoning ? supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion.

Except I didn't do that as I proved. Also, explain to me the definition of obscenity in the context of a website with pictures. Go ahead. Ive had too much enjoyment embarrassing thedoc, and it's just as fun with you.. So I'll wait.:1orglaugh

TheDoc 01-08-2011 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829743)
Except I didn't do that as I proved. Also, explain to me the definition of obscenity in the context of a website with pictures. Go ahead. Ive had too much enjoyment embarrassing thedoc, and it's just as fun with you.. So I'll wait.:1orglaugh

Hahaha, you didn't prove shit, you do it ALL the damn time - so it's not possible for you to disprove.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:34 PM

Definition of MORON

1
usually offensive : a person affected with mild mental retardation
2
: a very stupid person



Definition of TWIT

1
: an act of twitting : taunt
2
: a silly annoying person : fool




Redundant? LOL, no.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829743)
Except I didn't do that as I proved. Also, explain to me the definition of obscenity in the context of a website with pictures. Go ahead. Ive had too much enjoyment embarrassing thedoc, and it's just as fun with you.. So I'll wait.:1orglaugh

You missed some posts, Turbo.

I gave you what you asked for, acknowledge it and I'll provide more.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829747)
Definition of MORON

1
usually offensive : a person affected with mild mental retardation
2
: a very stupid person



Definition of TWIT

1
: an act of twitting : taunt
2
: a silly annoying person : fool




Redundant? LOL, no.

ROFL.. A fool IS a very stupid person and vice versa.:1orglaugh

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829748)
You missed some posts, Turbo.

I gave you what you asked for, acknowledge it and I'll provide more.

Go ahead and show us champ. YOu failed the last 3 attempts. I don't think you understand how a bluff works. And "we already know" isn't proof. Keep trying though this is humorous.:thumbsup

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829749)
ROFL.. A fool IS a very stupid person and vice versa.:1orglaugh

Really? Show me where in the definition of "fool" it says "a very stupid person".

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829751)
Go ahead and show us champ. YOu failed the last 3 attempts. I don't think you understand how a bluff works. And "we already know" isn't proof. Keep trying though this is humorous.:thumbsup

Ah, so you're still unable to acknowledge the proof I asked for. Again, typical and expected.

But please, tell me how your website has a PG-13 rating even more. LOL

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829752)
Really? Show me where in the definition of "fool" it says "a very stupid person".

http://thesaurus.com/browse/moron
http://thesaurus.com/browse/twit

Game, set, and match.. Again

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829754)
Ah, so you're still unable to acknowledge the proof I asked for. Again, typical and expected.

But please, tell me how your website has a PG-13 rating even more. LOL

You do realize that affiliate programs have "Pg-13" sites, right? My my, this is too easy.:1orglaugh

TheDoc 01-08-2011 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829758)
You do realize that affiliate programs have "Pg-13" sites, right? My my, this is too easy.:1orglaugh

You don't have a Website, do you? Spammers typically don't.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17829760)
You don't have a Website, do you? Spammers typically don't.

I didn't know I was a spammer. But I do enjoy the "holier than thou" attitude porn peddlers employ towards spammers.:1orglaugh

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829755)

I don't see where in the definition of "twit" it says "a stupid person".


Main Entry: twit
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: ridicule
Synonyms: banter, caricature, cartoon, chaff, deflate, deride, expose, fleer, gibe, haze, humiliate, jape, jeer, jest, jive, jolly, josh, kid, lampoon, laugh, laugh at, make a fool of, make a game of, make a laughing-stock, make fun of, mimic, mock, needle, pan, parody, poke fun at, pooh-pooh, pull one's leg, put down*, quiz, rag, rail at, rally, raz, rib, ride*, roast, run down, satirize, scoff, scorn, scout, send up, show up, sneer, takeoff, taunt, travesty, unmask



It seems you're mistaking "twit" for "dimwit".

TheDoc 01-08-2011 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829762)
I didn't know I was a spammer. But I do enjoy the "holier than thou" attitude porn peddlers employ towards spammers.:1orglaugh

You don't have a Website do you?

I never said I had an issue with spammers, unless they spam me. Your half defense of them, shows that you are a spammer though.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829758)
You do realize that affiliate programs have "Pg-13" sites, right? My my, this is too easy.:1orglaugh

You do realize PG ratings are for movies, right?

You did read how the MPAA defines PG-13, right? It can have expletives, nudity, etc.

Now revert back to the definition of "obscenity".


So much hand holding :(

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829763)
I don't see where in the definition of "twit" it says "a stupid person".


Main Entry: twit
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: ridicule
Synonyms: banter, caricature, cartoon, chaff, deflate, deride, expose, fleer, gibe, haze, humiliate, jape, jeer, jest, jive, jolly, josh, kid, lampoon, laugh, laugh at, make a fool of, make a game of, make a laughing-stock, make fun of, mimic, mock, needle, pan, parody, poke fun at, pooh-pooh, pull one's leg, put down*, quiz, rag, rail at, rally, raz, rib, ride*, roast, run down, satirize, scoff, scorn, scout, send up, show up, sneer, takeoff, taunt, travesty, unmask



It seems you're mistaking "twit" for "dimwit".

If you notice that a certain synonym for "moron" is the same as it is for "twit", you'd realize what redundant means. Please continue trying to talk your way out of this.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829768)
You do realize PG ratings are for movies, right?

You did read how the MPAA defines PG-13, right? It can have expletives, nudity, etc.

Now revert back to the definition of "obscenity".


So much hand holding :(

Quote:

You do realize that affiliate programs have "Pg-13" sites, right? My my, this is too easy
Yea, I agree, I'm spending my Saturday night embarrassing and educating someone below me..

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829769)
If you notice that a certain synonym for "moron" is the same as it is for "twit", you'd realize what redundant means. Please continue trying to talk your way out of this.

You do realize synonyms are not definitions, correct?

Example:
"ice" has a synonym of "chunk"

"chunk" is defined as:

Definition of CHUNK

1
: a short thick piece or lump (as of wood or coal)
2
: a large noteworthy quantity or part <bet a sizable chunk of money on the race>
3
: a strong thickset horse usually smaller than a draft horse





Do you see any mention of anything even referring to ice? No? Good. That's my point.


Show me the definition I asked for.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829771)
Yea, I agree, I'm spending my Saturday night embarrassing and educating someone below me..

So, then you agree you were wrong earlier. Glad we cleared that up.

The Demon 01-08-2011 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829772)
You do realize synonyms are not definitions, correct?

Example:
"ice" has a synonym of "chunk"

"chunk" is defined as:

Definition of CHUNK

1
: a short thick piece or lump (as of wood or coal)
2
: a large noteworthy quantity or part <bet a sizable chunk of money on the race>
3
: a strong thickset horse usually smaller than a draft horse





Do you see any mention of anything even referring to ice? No? Good. That's my point.


Show me the definition I asked for.



You do realize the definition of synonym right? Also, you do realize that if two words use the same synonyms, they are essentially redundant if used together? Or are you going to continue attempting to sound intelligent and failing? Either way, it's been fun making you look as dumb as thedoc. I'm going to leave you now to wallow in your delusions and denial. I expect both of you morons to talk about your hero the rest of the night but please don't blame me for being better than both of you in every facet of life. Have a good night now.:1orglaugh

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829779)
You do realize the definition of synonym right? Also, you do realize that if two words use the same synonyms, they are essentially redundant if used together? Or are you going to continue attempting to sound intelligent and failing? Either way, it's been fun making you look as dumb as thedoc. I'm going to leave you now to wallow in your delusions and denial. I expect both of you morons to talk about your hero the rest of the night but please don't blame me for being better than both of you in every facet of life. Have a good night now.:1orglaugh

Put simply, you're wrong.

Show me the definition I asked for, or are you going to continue skirting it?

TheDoc 01-08-2011 06:50 PM

He has no Website and he promotes PG dating.... Wow, I wonder what that could be? Anyone?

What I don't get is, you'll mouth porn, pornographers, our Industry, all day long.. but then you're just another dirty ass spammer than has to send pg rated shit to people, which is a clue as to what you're doing...

Hahahaha... garbage!

You know, if you would just admit that you're part of the scum of this Industry, you would get more respect.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17829785)
He has no Website and he promotes PG dating.... Wow, I wonder what that could be? Anyone?

What I don't get is, you'll mouth porn, pornographers, our Industry, all day long.. but then you're just another dirty ass spammer than has to send pg rated shit to people, which is a clue as to what you're doing...

Hahahaha... garbage!

You know, if you would just admit that you're part of the scum of this Industry, you would get more respect.

The humor is that he boasted about having a "PG-13" website, but PG ratings are for motion pictures, not websites. Then go on to say PG-13 does not have obscenities, even though the MPAA says it does.

mgtarheels 01-08-2011 06:53 PM

Time for football, cya ladies.

TheDoc 01-08-2011 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17829789)
The humor is that he boasted about having a "PG-13" website, but PG ratings are for motion pictures, not websites.

I suspect he's sending to Christian/religious based dating. It's easy to find, lots of people mark it on profiles.

But I do see what you're saying :)

SuckOnThis 01-08-2011 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829642)
I wouldn't know. Hows the welfare my tax dollars are responsible for? Shouldn't you be busy proving the bullshit you've been typing or are you going to humor us the rest of the night? :)

Speaking as a liberal Democrat - thank you, thank you, thank you. You're an absolutely superb example of current right wing intellectual thought. You are a gem, a treasure, and should be held up frequently and often as "Exhibit A - Typical FOX News Watcher and Sarah Palin Fan"

MetaMan 01-08-2011 07:39 PM

WTF is even going on in this thread anymore? :1orglaugh

YOU'RE A LIBERAL, YOU'RE A DEMOCRAT, YOU'RE GREEN, NO YOUR'RE PINK!

DWB 01-08-2011 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17829032)
opt-in today, required tomorrow.

Bingo.

This is why things are the way they are now. Boiling the frog slowly....

Or, let some huge identity theft issue take place and most everyone will BEG the gov to protect them from the big bad internet terrorist.

BFT3K 01-08-2011 11:13 PM

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4Lm1GGnO9b...root-canal.jpg

vanillaice 01-09-2011 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17829598)
the funny thing is, the doc is both incompetent and one sided and then he tries to lecture people about objectivity and the two party system.

The two party system? lol I can't believe people would support that, unless they were in Washington making money off it. Tons of people die daily because of the two party system, and to me, life is more important than some ridiculous game a few rich people play in Washington.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123