My experiences with "Tube Sites Submitter" so far

[biskoppen]

Pretty awesome software..

http://www.tubessitessubmitter.com

Pros :
1) Regging to new tube is fast and painless, even the manual ones is done 99% for you
2) The interface is nice, simple and clear

Cons :
1) They want you to buy the email confirmer software next to this.. that's lame, that should be included in this software
2) It seems like the software cant batch submit, only do one video (one video submitted to all tubes in the list ofcourse) and then it stops.. but I am not 100% sure on this

Bugs :
1) Quite a few submits fails due to strange errors as a 2nd video missing or something.. which is not something I am able to add anywhere?
2) When I quit the software one of more tube.exe's is still live in the memory, and these bitches makes the computer slow as fuck

[woj]

so making good $$ with it?

[biskoppen]

Originally Posted by woj

so making good $$ with it?

Submitting to tubes is a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG term way of income
Most of the tubes this software has in the list so far is tiny ones (that should have been in my cons list)

Unless you have access to massive tube traffic, this will never be more than pocket money for most that submit

[Agent 488]

thanks for your honest review.

[signupdamnit]

If they only have 200 tubes in the database you would expect far better quality. There are many thousands out there who take uploads.

[loreen]

Originally Posted by biskoppen

Submitting to tubes is a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG term way of income

So that's another form for "no, nothing yet"?

[fris]

Originally Posted by biskoppen

Submitting to tubes is a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG term way of income
Most of the tubes this software has in the list so far is tiny ones (that should have been in my cons list)

Unless you have access to massive tube traffic, this will never be more than pocket money for most that submit

i see you upoad a lot of videos to tube8.com, are you doing it by hand or using a submitter?

[SpicyM]

You dont need a submitter to upload a video to the most important tubes as there are only 5 or 6 that list uploads and send some reasonable traffic.

I have tested it, well done but useless, should cost $35 one time fee.

The problem with tubes is that the submission is not intended for webmasters, but for visitors.. therefore you have to use watermarks to monetize it , which dont have to be accepted by the reviewer.

If they started selling submit passes that would be a different situation. So far its just useless..

Shit I miss TGPs

[biskoppen]

Originally Posted by fris

i see you upoad a lot of videos to tube8.com, are you doing it by hand or using a submitter?

I hand submit to the big tubes

[buildingfutures]

I submitted using the software as well. It works great and fast and what not but as stated above. Most of the tubes are really small and you just get a handful of traffic from them.

The ones that do matter are easy to submit to manually.

[LeRoy]

RU submitting as an affiliate or program owner?

Just to be clear

[fris]

Originally Posted by LeRoy

RU submitting as an affiliate or program owner?

Just to be clear

pretty sure as a program owner, the ones in his sig.

[LeRoy]

Originally Posted by fris

pretty sure as a program owner, the ones in his sig.

I would have guessed that too.

Some program owners have partners and the working partner might be promoting the sites as an affiliate.

Like I said... just to be clear

[biskoppen]

Hmm.. the software crashes when left to submit overnight.. will post a screenshot of the error the next time it happens

[fris]

Originally Posted by biskoppen

Hmm.. the software crashes when left to submit overnight.. will post a screenshot of the error the next time it happens

for tube8, did you have to apply for an account, or just regular account and upload?

[seeandsee]

you can upload on tube8 via regular account?

[biskoppen]

Originally Posted by fris

for tube8, did you have to apply for an account, or just regular account and upload?

I dont remember